Genza

Eat. Sleep. Fun. Repeat.

[𝕄𝕚𝕔𝕜𝕪𝕓𝕖𝕫𝕠𝕤🏅 @MickeyB_jnr]

The scene, The commentary 🥶

[levered beta boy @leveredbetaboy2]

If $META employees are learning about the future of AI from Kyle fucking Kuzma it deserves to trade at a sub market multiple

[Ch1rag.ś @Ch1ragjpg]

@nautfcb U’ll only pass it to me won’t u bruno ?

[Malvin @ManOfFocus_]

As a man, only a deep pocket and your mother's prayers will save you. You are on your own. Alwayyyyyyys on your own.

[Mukisa Isaac @mrisaacmukisa]

@IAmSteveHarvey Uganda 🇺🇬 the Pearl of Africa!
From gorilla trekking in Bwindi to the epic Nile source and Lake Victoria sunsets… untouched beauty, warm hearts, and zero crowds. Steve, pack your bags this secret’s ready to shine!

[alexei @alexeixbt]

the final act of genius is playing dumb

[OurFaveOnlineDoc 🇬🇧 🇳🇬 @OurFavOnlineDoc]

If you watch this video you will notice this lady keeps saying “don’t put the man’s name on your child’s birth certificate or you will suffer”, but she never tells you how/why the woman will suffer. I will tell you what she’s doing.

In the uk, for those who don’t know:
If you are named as a man as the father on the birth certificate of a child, you have a right to do a DNA paternity test on your own on that child without seeking the permission of the mother or anybody. Same way a child’s mother on the birth certificate can do a DNA maternity test on the child on her own if she wishes to, without anybody’s permission. (Except if the child is older than 16 then the child must consent).

Now IF your name is not on the birth certificate as the father, and you suspect the baby is not yours, you must get the mother’s authorisation to do a DNA test- which she will likely refuse once there are paternity disputes, and there are fears you won’t continue to send money to her once the DNA test shows you are not the father.

So this crook here is advising young ladies to not put any man’s name on the birth certificate so that they can hang the baby on any man they wish, and the man will be unable to demand a DNA test yet he can be compelled by a court to care for that child for 16years, until the child is old enough to get a job.

It is an evil wicked demonic plan hatched by crooked paternity fraud criminals who want to hang one man’s baby on another man’s head. Once you see people who say or share things like this, pls run for your life.

Once you see people wear T-shirts with retarded inscriptions, they usually say asinine crap. Again, if you ignore the signs, you will surely see wonders.

[Mutana ❁ @bruno_akampa]

Never Forget;

- The 7th Parliament (2001–2006) which passed removal of presidential term limits.

- The 10th Parliament (2016–2021) which passed the removal of the 75-year presidential age limit.

- The 11th Parliament (2021-2026) on the Protection of Sovereignty Bill, 2026.

[Mike Davis @MichaelDDavisJr]

Uganda has a very limited number of formal investment opportunities:

1) The @USEUganda has a limited number of listings (18 companies, 2 indices, and 2 corporate bonds).
2) @BOU_Official treasury bonds (@nssfug is more or less a proxy for this)
3) Land/Real Estate

Supply-side: Limited formal opportunities

Demand-side: Wealth generation with limited recourse and a house of cards with potentional to collapse (A considerable amount of the USE is owned by NSSF; a considerable amount of the treasury bonds is owned by NSSF - and you have Presidential/senior advisors - @AndrewMwenda - indicating that domestic bonds may default on domestic bonds in the next few years)

Demand-side: Wealth-generation is occurring (regardless of whether the mass population is seeing this reality)

Therefore, the only outlets are: Land/Real Estate and international wealth transfer. Since land/real estate is very tangible, this is an easy mechanism to "invest" in.

Simply: There is nowhere else to invest!

That is why property in Kampala is more expensive than many Western cities.

[Genza @TheefirstDavid]

@big_business_

[Mari @Tech_girlll]

Software Engineers going back to Documentation after reaching their Claude limit.

[Genza @TheefirstDavid]

@OPMUganda @Parliament_Ug @ItalyinUganda

[Anish Moonka @anishmoonka]

Tom Cruise is 63 years old. He earned over $100 million from the last Top Gun movie. And the studio behind the new one is in so much financial trouble that they need this film to be a big hit.

The Cruise deal is unusual. For every movie ticket sold, he takes roughly 10 cents on the dollar of what the studio earns, and he gets paid before the studio gets back a single dollar of what it spent making the film. Most actors get a salary and maybe a small cut of the profit at the very end. No other actor in Hollywood still has this contract.

Paramount just merged with Skydance, the smaller company that helped fund the last Top Gun. The combined business is now $79 billion in debt and chasing a $110 billion purchase of Warner Bros, another big Hollywood studio. Their yearly profits have been cut roughly in half over four years. Their stock sits near its lowest point in years.

The new CEO is David Ellison, son of Oracle billionaire Larry Ellison. His company put up 25% of the money for the last Top Gun back when nobody thought a sequel 36 years later would work. He knows exactly how much that film made. He just announced Top Gun 3 at Hollywood's biggest annual convention.

But this movie is not happening soon. The director, Joe Kosinski, is busy shooting a Miami Vice reboot and then an Apple sci-fi thriller. Cruise, at 63, has a shrinking window for the kind of real stunt flying that made the last one feel electric. Best guess for a release date: 2028.

The original 1986 Top Gun cost $15 million to make. The 2022 sequel cost $177 million and earned nearly $1.5 billion. Top Gun 3 will likely cost over $250 million. Ellison is wagering that one Tom Cruise movie can rescue a company now carrying more than twice as much debt as its yearly revenue.

[Charles Onyango-Obbo @cobbo3]

Uganda’s proposed Sovereignty Bill is the ONLY law in the world openly attempting something this sweeping: it legally turns its own citizens abroad into “foreigners”.

The Bill is explicit. A “foreigner” includes “Ugandan citizens residing abroad”.

That single clause redraws the boundary of citizenship. It means diaspora money, relationships, and even family support can fall under foreign control rules.

So the implications are not abstract.
-A mother in Mbale receiving school fees from her son in London.
-A boda boda rider in Gulu financed by a brother in Dubai.
-A small shop in Mbarara stocked using capital sent from Boston.

All could, in theory, fall under foreign influence rules.

Then the net widens.

The definition of an “agent of a foreigner” includes anyone “directly or indirectly… financed or subsidised” by a foreigner.

Not directed. Not controlled. Simply funded.

-A journalist paid by a locally registered outlet that receives donor support.
-A researcher on a project with partial foreign grants.
-An NGO worker whose salary traces back, however distantly, to external funding.

All can be classified as “agents”.

Clause 22 then imposes a hard ceiling: “a cap on foreign funding of approximately UGX 400 million within any twelve-month period”, beyond which ministerial approval is required.

So:
-A private hospital built with diaspora investment.
-A school supported by an international foundation.
-A construction firm using a foreign loan.

Then comes the sharpest edge.
-Clause 13 creates the offence of economic sabotage, criminalising anyone who “publishes information… that weakens or damages the economic system”.

So:

-A newspaper reporting a currency slide.
-An analyst warning about debt stress.
-A civil society group highlighting inflation pressures.

Even if accurate, such reporting could fall foul of the law.

Finally, Clause 5 prohibits activities that promote foreign interests “against the interests of Uganda”, a phrase the law does not define.

Put together, these clauses do something unprecedented.

-They do not just regulate foreign influence.
-They redefine who is foreign.
-They extend control from politics into everyday economic and social life.

In most countries, including Ethiopia and Ethiopia, sovereignty laws manage outsiders.
Here, Uganda redefined outsiders to include its citizens, basically rewriting the 1995 constitution. Of course it’s in the preparatory and consultation stage and could change for better - or WORSE!

[Genza @TheefirstDavid]

@Abu_Jawaadd 100% real

[Genza @TheefirstDavid]

@yoyoyo777712 @Kraventhe1st @weremeow @Backpack @phantom 😂😂

[Genza @TheefirstDavid]

@DeFiKev

[Genza @TheefirstDavid]

@sandyXBT @JupiterExchange So instead of getting the facts straight you rather copy and paste. Do you know what 25% is by any chance?

[Genza @TheefirstDavid]

@maggothunter11 @kashdhanda @weremeow 25%?? Really?? Alot of ya'll are in disbelief that a number of the JUP stakers are in favour of option 2. And alot of them are the heavy stakers, NOT farmers. Let it run

[Genza @TheefirstDavid]

@bullishshegen @andrea_sicky @maggothunter11 @kashdhanda @weremeow He's not defending. Those there are facts. Alot of ya'll are also ignoring the fact that a huge number of JUP users are also in support of option 2. They just not as loud as ya'll.