LLM Knowledge Bases
Something I'm finding very useful recently: using LLMs to build personal knowledge bases for various topics of research interest. In this way, a large fraction of my recent token throughput is going less into manipulating code, and more into manipulating knowledge (stored as markdown and images). The latest LLMs are quite good at it. So:
Data ingest:
I index source documents (articles, papers, repos, datasets, images, etc.) into a raw/ directory, then I use an LLM to incrementally "compile" a wiki, which is just a collection of .md files in a directory structure. The wiki includes summaries of all the data in raw/, backlinks, and then it categorizes data into concepts, writes articles for them, and links them all. To convert web articles into .md files I like to use the Obsidian Web Clipper extension, and then I also use a hotkey to download all the related images to local so that my LLM can easily reference them.
IDE:
I use Obsidian as the IDE "frontend" where I can view the raw data, the the compiled wiki, and the derived visualizations. Important to note that the LLM writes and maintains all of the data of the wiki, I rarely touch it directly. I've played with a few Obsidian plugins to render and view data in other ways (e.g. Marp for slides).
Q&A:
Where things get interesting is that once your wiki is big enough (e.g. mine on some recent research is ~100 articles and ~400K words), you can ask your LLM agent all kinds of complex questions against the wiki, and it will go off, research the answers, etc. I thought I had to reach for fancy RAG, but the LLM has been pretty good about auto-maintaining index files and brief summaries of all the documents and it reads all the important related data fairly easily at this ~small scale.
Output:
Instead of getting answers in text/terminal, I like to have it render markdown files for me, or slide shows (Marp format), or matplotlib images, all of which I then view again in Obsidian. You can imagine many other visual output formats depending on the query. Often, I end up "filing" the outputs back into the wiki to enhance it for further queries. So my own explorations and queries always "add up" in the knowledge base.
Linting:
I've run some LLM "health checks" over the wiki to e.g. find inconsistent data, impute missing data (with web searchers), find interesting connections for new article candidates, etc., to incrementally clean up the wiki and enhance its overall data integrity. The LLMs are quite good at suggesting further questions to ask and look into.
Extra tools:
I find myself developing additional tools to process the data, e.g. I vibe coded a small and naive search engine over the wiki, which I both use directly (in a web ui), but more often I want to hand it off to an LLM via CLI as a tool for larger queries.
Further explorations:
As the repo grows, the natural desire is to also think about synthetic data generation + finetuning to have your LLM "know" the data in its weights instead of just context windows.
TLDR: raw data from a given number of sources is collected, then compiled by an LLM into a .md wiki, then operated on by various CLIs by the LLM to do Q&A and to incrementally enhance the wiki, and all of it viewable in Obsidian. You rarely ever write or edit the wiki manually, it's the domain of the LLM. I think there is room here for an incredible new product instead of a hacky collection of scripts.
Would it be so that in the future, agentic AI becomes so untrusted by individuals and organisations, that every party needs a personal-centric full-stack sw and hw approach that works just for you - data generated and sensed on device, processed and inferred and consumed locally?
Sometimes I feel like, no matter what I do and what I will have achived, though may not appear to be linked to my current vision, I have the ability to adjust it to my advantage, somehow. The key is, we as a human have the ability to think and adapt, logically and emotionally.
Good to know Tesla has been building and deploying AI series chips in Tesla cars and Optimus. Curious to know how Tesla wants to apply AI in chip designs too - are you building the stack yourself, or start with Ai-enabled EDA tools and methodology first?
Most people don’t know that Tesla has had an advanced AI chip and board engineering team for many years.
That team has already designed and deployed several million AI chips in our cars and data centers. These chips are what enable Tesla to be the leader in real-world AI.
The current version in cars is AI4, we are close to taping out AI5 and are starting work on AI6. Our goal is to bring a new AI chip design to volume production every 12 months. We expect to build chips at higher volumes ultimately than all other AI chips combined. Read that sentence again, as I’m not kidding.
These chips will profoundly change the world in positive ways, saving millions of lives due to safer driving and providing advanced medical care to all people via Optimus.
Send an email with three bullet points describing evidence of your exceptional ability to [email protected].
We are particularly interested in applying cutting edge AI to chip design.
Thanks,
Elon
I am starting to get a feeling that, the notion of ‘relationship’ in Chinese business settings are somewhat different on the ground. But, on the top level, even the state level, f2f still matters the most - US’s and China’s leaders meeting in Busan is a great example of all.
Run towards the hardest problems - truly inspiring. In startup worlds though, we need to balance the pros and cons when addressing industrial challenges, particularly if you are a young company and need to find market product fit asap and gain traction and revenue.
I am advocate for constructive query and constructive response, particularly technical discussions. You need clear, meaningful, sometimes sophicicated discussions. However, in service industry you just need an effective and effient discussion, so you can get on with other things
One thing I really don't like about https://t.co/F1nvnnpeUN is, it takes forever (literally) to speak to the customer service, and often it doesn't reach to anybody, leaving feeling helpless. Worst, you get nothing done and the thing is still on your to do list.
But then, the time that's wasted in waiting for a simple response (as sometimes you don't have a complicated query, you just need a simple and quick answer) really kills you.
I remember a time when I was really struggling to get answers to my submissions for a uk visa application (multiple occasions). I understand that I need to clarify my queries so the uk visa team can respond "to the point" and "no time wasted".
In contrast, the Chinese govs do a really great job at serving their "customers" - way way way more effient and much more cost-effective. You got a query? No problem, give me a call, and straightaway you have the answer. No time wasted.