@xplanetv@Mustbeme81@Gnosisinformant Gnosis said that it’s a technique used over thousands of years up until modern times, so he is just pointing out the absurdity of the claim that it’s easy when the only example that we have is incomparable
@michaelshermer@AlchemyAmerican@PostDisclosure Trying to act like Jesse is scared to talk to you is actually so unexpectedly hilarious… like if we know anything about Jesse it’s that he will talk to ANYONE. Just ask mick west 🤣
@jaysutherlanduk@matthewdmarsden Also… we are talking about record highs here. A SINGLE data point. Idk where you got this average temperature of an era thing
Yes! We are getting somewhere. Now you need to realize how shitty your analogy was and why it makes no fucking sense 🤣🤣 but for that, you will have to come to the realization that you have been lied to probably for your entire life and the things you believe to be detrimental to the environment are actually more than likely beneficial not only to the biosphere as a whole but also to human prosperity. This will take some independent research however and for you to not trust the “climate scientists” that told you otherwise. Keep in mind that degree/profession didn’t even exist until 2018. I’m just asking you to think for yourself a little bit and maybe then maybe you will realize why the analogy was atrocious
You still can even make the comparison for me 🤣 tell me how the score of a single football game from one year can have any relevancy on the game of another. The conditions of the game are variable. Climate data IS invariable and can be inferred SCIENTIFICALLY. please make it make sense. This is a rough one
No an analogy is a literary term. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 are you writing an essay here? What’s your thesis? You are comparing scientific data to the score of a soccer game. Again, there is NO comparison to be made here. An analogy is used to compare similar things. There is no similarity in sports and science. Check.
You are right, weather is much more variable and will change within the minute. We are talking about climate here. Data that is collected and sparsed over decades. Weather should absolutely not be included in the discussion of climate change or whatever we are calling it these days. It is something we would call “irrelevant”.
@Anas_se_@matthewdmarsden Would you agree that carbons are not the only factor that goes into deciding the climate of the earth? Maybe even one of the smallest factors in the equation? Big ones might be like maybe… the sun.. and the earths relative distance and angle to the sun.. just a thought
I see two ad hominem comments out of you and no legitimate response to the topic at hand. If we are such idiots, then please lay out your argument as to why we should be concerned about a current temperature high that was only matched 82 years ago. Carbon levels in 1944 would have been much lower compared to now so what was cause the temperature spike in back then? And why did the temperature stay below this temp for the last 82 years with maximum increased carbon output since?
@jaysutherlanduk@matthewdmarsden You are trying to compare hard scientific data ie. temperature data which is gathered through very sensitive instruments to the score of a football game… 🤣 sit this one out chief
🧃 I have posted dozens of High Definition (1080p - 4k) images of UAP - it still didn’t change anything 🛸 👽
Below is a 1080p orb UAP from late 2021 / early 2022. Personally I’ve had “D” Disclosure back in 2017.
Do you believe high definitions images would change your mind?