What's next for #FHIR? Find out at #FHIRNorth, where I'll be presenting on "How to build a FHIR iGuide that gets adopted". Join me: https://t.co/g7lit0iKld
@hidrees It’s a bit more complicated than in US because you can all a snap election any time, so terms vary in length. A certain natural ennui among the electorate seems to seep in after 7-8 years anyway. Only the early years prime ministers went past 10 years.
@chrissyfarr We do genetic screens for hearing problems in newborns universally in Ontario. Consent is required to inspect the result - which is quite a difficult process to collect and track.
@supermarioelia@fauldscat I find the @TorontoStar dashboard is pretty good now. They revise it pretty regularly, I’m sure in a few days they’ll bring back the “% of adults” metric for us to check compulsively.
It's good to step away from a UI design for a week to get some distance from my own brain. When I come back it's easier to see it with user eyes - and figure out if I really love it or hate it. I had a "love it" feeling this morning on some recent work.
I find that committee-style meetings contribute a lot more to "Zoom fatigue" than highly focused problem-solving meetings - which energize me. Probably not just a Zoom thing, just a thing thing.
@waynemsamuels@SandyTecimer@IlanShahin Yes exactly right, but to provide good value that team needs streams of care rather than one big funnel of work. A large care team could have a Maple-style stream for basic care while maintaining continuity. Prescription #7 is jumping at me right now. https://t.co/LGKyFdpasZ
@waynemsamuels@IlanShahin Imagine a collaborative care team - each of whom have access to my health record - with a Maple-like process. Then work backwards from there to figure out how to make it work. Seems entirely do-able to me with the right leadership and levers.