If God sent both prophets, we have a built-in way to evaluate them: The Torah. It is the established covenant document. Every subsequent claimant to prophetic succession is, like it or not, auditioning against it. So let’s see how they performed.
Jesus’s audition is aggressive. Six times in Matthew 5 he says, “you have heard it said to those of ancient times,” and then overrides it with his own authority. Not “God told me,” or “the revelation says,” but a staggering “I say to you.”
It goes deeper. When asked about divorce, Jesus doesn't quibble over Mosaic permissions. He goes entirely behind Moses, back to creation itself. He didn't just know what Moses said; he knew why he said it, locating the original intent. That’s insider knowledge.
Then he initiates comparisons rather than just surviving them. “Before Abraham was, I am.” In Matthew 22, he turns a question about the Davidic Messiah into a devastating counter-examination: “If David calls the Messiah Lord (in Psalm 110), how is he his son?” Nobody could answer. They looked like fools.
Moses knew the covenant with Abraham. Jesus knew the Law from the inside out. There is an organic, traceable coherence.
Now apply that same logic forward. Muhammad also claims prophetic succession, explicitly stating he came to confirm what came before. So we use the same standard.
Muhammad versus the Torah. He knows the narrative furniture; Sinai, the commandments, the golden calf. But he completely misses the interior logic. He knows what happened, but he doesn't seem to inhabit what it meant.
But Muhammad versus Jesus is where the argument entirely collapses.
What does the Quran actually know about what Jesus TAUGHT? I’m not talking about his birth, his miracles, or late-stage theological arguments about his nature. What does it know about his message?
There are no Beatitudes in the Quran. No Lord’s Prayer. No “love your enemies.” No Golden Rule. Not a single parable. Not one antithesis from the Sermon on the Mount. The Quran’s Jesus has almost no teaching content at all. His most notable speeches are a denial of his own divinity and a prediction of the prophet coming after him 😂. You know what is happening there.
The parables were given to massive crowds. The Lord’s Prayer was meant to be repeated. This material was widely circulating. Yet, none of it appears.
A genuine successor would have done to Jesus what Jesus did to Moses. He would have engaged the text. “You have heard that Jesus said love your enemies, but I say to you...” Muhammad never does. He never demonstrates that he knows what Jesus taught well enough to confirm it, let alone extend it. This silence is a structural disqualification.
The standard fallback is that prophets don’t need to demonstrate continuity. But that violates Muhammad’s own terms. The Quran presents itself as a confirmation of previous scripture. In Surah 5:47, it commands 7th-century Christians, present tense, to judge by the Gospel God revealed to them. If the text was already hopelessly corrupted, that instruction makes zero sense.
The claim that the Gospels were textually altered before Islam, is absent from the Quran. It was invented later by Muslim scholars who noticed the exact problem we are looking at right now. They had to conclude the Gospels were altered, because the alternative was admitting their prophet was wrong.
But history doesn't back them up. Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus predate Islam by centuries, the text hasn't moved.
The prophetic chain has one absolute structural requirement: each link must actually know the one before it. Moses knew Abraham. Jesus knew the Law deeply enough to raise the bar antithesis by antithesis. Muhammad gives us a Jesus stripped of the Sermon on the Mount, stripped of his parables, and stripped of his ethics. Only one of them showed up knowing the material, his name is Jesus.
@AttorneyF_ My first time on a long post. Your post. And I read it completely with understanding. Spot on it passed the exact message and gave the right context and meaning. God bless you immensely, wish this was a podcast i was in with you. Mehn
@NationalGridNg E be like say @NationalGridNg don really monitise this account, cos this kind of post nah engagement farming, nothing else ooo. 6hrs light and we should be proud of at least 6hrs light. I've not even boasted of 4 to talk of 6.
🚀 Validating data on decentralized storage network & earning rewards! Join me for airdrop + more from DeNet’s storage clients!
📲 Get the free app: https://t.co/rGUecqkzHz
#DeNet#WatcherNode
With or without @RepRileyMoore, it is important to answer the following questions:
1. Who does the killing?
2. Why do they do the killing?
3. Why is there a greater commitment to the denial of a Christian genocide than ending insecurity?
4. Who are those primarily speaking on behalf of the killers, asking that the demands of the killers be met in order for peace to be?
5. Why is it only “social media influencers” and Islamic clerics from a particular section of Nigeria that are vehemently in denial of the Christian genocide, even more than they speak against the negative impact of the Islamists on their own people?
@EleluAyoola As you don speak English finish. So that structure is now the only solution you could come up for what ever it is that's happening in that area. I fear we're still in 1507
@NationalGridNg @EKEDP has the national Grid fallen again cos this issue of not having light since morning where 16hrs light for band B is promised isn't fulfilled is alarming. Tomorrow a capped bill will be sent for someone to pay.
@aproko_doctor When they decide not to get healthcare equipments, and buy cars to flex. National Grid keeps falling often and on and health budget are syphoned which makes maintenance of those equipment impossible. Omo this country eh kai.