Oops … early smack down for Mad Ed as he tries hard to continue the narrative about climate change setting the world on fire.
Mad Ed and his equally mad globalist colleagues have spent years embedding the UN’s SDG 13 and SDG 15 into climate, biodiversity, forestry and land use policy.
The EU admits that rural abandonment, reduced grazing and prescribed burning, and inadequate forest management have allowed huge quantities of flammable vegetation to accumulate.
They don’t really want you to know this. The Internet annoys them, it’s why they want it censored!
BP to quit North Sea Oil production after 60 years - this used to be British Petroleum. Very depressing but entirely result of mad net zero policies. https://t.co/gR6n1KU4sM
Soy de Ceuta, y lo que estamos viviendo ahora mismo es una auténtica invasión, por favor, necesitamos la difusión de todos para que declaren emergencia nacional. Por ahora ha sido solicitada por el gobierno de Ceuta y ha sido rechazada.
Remember Dr Stella Immanuel in 2020 claiming she & her team had successfully treated over 350 Covid patients with Hydroxychloroquine ?
She was professionally destroyed in the MSM, banned from social media.
An effective treatment would have precluded emergency ‘vaccine’ use !
I blurred these images of the lifeless bodies of Christian babies and toddlers slaughtered by Muslims in Nigeria last Sunday.
As much as I want people to know about the full horror, traumatizing random viewers will not force the needed change.
Western politicians and news outlets that chose silence must be named and held accountable. Their refusal to confront this is not neutrality—it is complicity.
Most “news” sites ignore or bury it, and the few headlines deliberately minimize the massacre of Christians while erasing the jihadists’ identity and motives.
Last Sunday night in Naridon village, Kaduna State, Nigeria, armed Fulani jihadists stormed a Christian farming community. Dozens of Christians, including children, were slaughtered. The lifeless bodies of Christian babies and toddlers offer only a small glimpse of the unimaginable suffering inflicted on Christians every day across Africa and Asia.
Western leaders who never miss a chance to lecture their nations about “multilateralism, diversity and inclusion” never call emergency sessions at the UN Security Council or Human Rights Council when Christians are butchered. They never push real sanctions on the governments and networks that embolden this slaughter.
They look away while the Christian death toll climbs to genocidal levels.
Their actions matter. Their inaction matters more.
History will judge them all.
Just tried putting "What would happen if British Police helped 20-30 yr old men board an inflatible dinghy, and then our coastguard escorted it to French waters?" into Google.
It says it would breach international law and trigger a diplomatic crisis.
Make this make sense?
Britain Pays France £662 Million to Stop the Boats. It Has Also Designed the Perfect Magnet to Attract Them.
In Koksijde, Belgium, asylum seekers sleep eight to a room on camp beds separated by curtains. They receive eight pounds a week. They eat sloppy rice in a former barracks. For every fifty men, there are seven or eight toilets. Those who wait two years for a decision and receive what they call a negative are removed. The regional governor of West Flanders, Carl Decaluwe, says he can only dream of receiving the kind of financial support Britain gives France.
Across the Channel, the picture is rather different. Asylum seekers in Britain receive forty-nine pounds a week. Three meals a day. Free toiletries, free healthcare, free legal advice and free entertainment. Three and four star hotel accommodation in many cases. Almost everything, provided by the British taxpayer.
Decaluwe does not need a criminologist to explain why boats are leaving his beaches for Britain rather than staying in Belgium. In the last five years there were one or two departures from West Flanders in total. This year alone there have already been twenty-nine launches and the crossing season has barely started. The governor has convened emergency meetings. He is bracing for an explosion in numbers through the summer. He cannot close the border with France because Brussels will not allow it.
Meanwhile, Britain has just signed a new three year deal with France worth six hundred and sixty-two million pounds, paying for drones, helicopters and additional riot police. This is on top of the five hundred million already paid to fund French patrols and surveillance. Crossings have hit new records every year since Britain began paying France to stop them. The governor of West Flanders, asked about the value of the arrangement, was unequivocal. You get nothing, he said. Nothing. If you see the results, year after year, record numbers arriving on British shores.
The French have been photographed smiling and pointing as dinghies leave from under their noses. Last year they were witnessed putting migrants on free public transport to departure points. Migrants landed in Kent on the same day the new deal was signed. The Home Office has quietly built in a provision to withdraw funding after a year if results are not delivered, which suggests even ministers do not believe the arrangement will work.
Labour scrapped the Rwanda scheme on taking office, describing it as expensive and ineffective. Rwanda had not yet removed a single person and the cost projections were significant. The six hundred and sixty-two million pounds now committed to France, producing record crossings year after year, apparently meets a different standard of value for money. Several European countries are now reportedly exploring Rwanda-style third country arrangements of their own, having watched the problem grow.
The pull factors driving this crisis are well understood. They are a policy choice. A country that accommodates asylum seekers in hotels, pays them six times what Belgium provides, and offers free legal assistance to delay removal for years has built a system that functions as the most powerful magnet on the continent. Paying France not to intercept the people drawn by that magnet is merely a subscription service for managed failure.
Starmer promised to smash the gangs. The gangs are expanding their operations, opening new fronts, and sending as many boats as possible simultaneously as a deliberate tactic to overwhelm coastal surveillance. Two hundred thousand undocumented young males have entered Britain by small boat. The crossing season has not yet reached its peak.
The boats will not stop until Britain stops making itself the most attractive destination in Europe. Every other question is secondary to that one.
The Islamic regime in Iran keeps executing innocent people who protested against Islam's tyranny. No one in the international community seems to care. Please share if you do!
@drchrisnewton Remember the pressure Liz was under to address "eating or heating" from parliamentarians and the MSM?
This really is all rigged. We see them.
Repeat this 100 times every day until you get it:
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS GLOBAL AVERAGE SURFACE TEMPERATURE
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS GLOBAL AVERAGE SURFACE TEMPERATURE
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS GLOBAL AVERAGE SURFACE TEMPERATURE
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS GLOBAL AVERAGE SURFACE TEMPERATURE
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS GLOBAL AVERAGE SURFACE TEMPERATURE
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS GLOBAL AVERAGE SURFACE TEMPERATURE
The obvious answer to losing our foreign shearers is to simply train our own. Britain already does. Training was never the problem, and here is what actually is.
The country has fourteen million breeding ewes and about three months to shear them, because the fleece has to come off in a short warm window or the animal suffers. A mountain of work crammed into one season, then nothing for nine months.
So think like someone weighing up the trade. You spend years mastering one of the hardest physical skills in farming, shearing hundreds a day with calm hands and no harm to the animal, and the reward is twelve brutal weeks in summer and three quarters of a year with no work and no money. Nobody builds a life on that. So they don't, and who could blame them.
The shearers who fly in have solved the one problem Britain cannot. A top shearer works four countries a year, New Zealand, America, Britain, Australia, three months in each, chasing the season round the planet until twelve weeks becomes fifty. That is what makes it a career instead of a summer job, and no single country can recreate it, because no single country has more than one season.
There used to be British gangs on this circuit. Contractors who travelled, who trained the next lot, who knew every shed in the dale. That world thinned as the wool stopped paying and the young went to jobs that ran all year, and the gap was filled by the shearers who fly in, who now teach the British newcomers coming up, because the knowledge had nowhere else to live. Cut them off and you do not force Britain to train its own. You remove the last people still doing the teaching.
And this is what makes it so hard to stomach. Seventy-five people, in for twelve weeks, gone the day the job is done, costing the taxpayer nothing and leaving the flock shorn. If any arrival on earth is the useful kind, it is this one. A government serious about who comes and goes would fling the door open to exactly these people and spend its energy on the arrivals it genuinely cannot account for.
It has done the precise reverse. A hard No for the seventy-five it could see, needed and time-limit, while the numbers it cannot explain carry on untouched.
They looked at a skills chain held together by seasonal workers and decided the workers were the problem. They were the only reason it still existed.