🚨 🚨 THE SD GOP HAS 3 OPTIONS AFTER THE PRESLER DISASTER. ALL 3 ARE CATASTROPHIC.
This is the moment nobody wants to talk about.
After denying Scott Presler entry with a ticket in hand, putting a BOLO photo of him at the door, and getting caught on video saying "Get the hell outta here" → the South Dakota Republican Party is now boxed into THREE choices. And every single one is a nightmare:
⚠️ OPTION 1: PRETEND IT WAS JUST ONE BAD ACTOR
– Fire the Sergeant at Arms, issue an apology, call it a day
– Ignore the fact that Chairman Eschenbaum confirmed Thune asked Presler not to attend
– Let Thune off the hook entirely
– The base notices. They always notice.
– The grassroots remembers who ran the BOLO photo operation
⚠️ OPTION 2: FULLY INVESTIGATE AND HOLD LEADERSHIP ACCOUNTABLE
– Acknowledge that Senate Majority Leader Thune's office was involved
– Demand answers for why a man with a ticket was turned away with a photo at the door
– Risk a civil war between the Thune establishment wing and the Presler grassroots wing
– Blow up the unity the Chairman just called for in his apology
– Open the door to a censure resolution that's already being filed
⚠️ OPTION 3: DO NOTHING AND HOPE IT BLOWS OVER
– Watch Presler's video of the denial rack up millions of views
– Watch the censure resolution against Thune move forward anyway
– Let the base conclude that the SD GOP protects establishment senators over grassroots activists
– Lose the very voters Presler has been registering
– Hand Democrats a gift-wrapped story about Republican infighting
Let that sink in.
There is no Option 4. There is no clean exit. There is no "we fired one guy and now it's over."
The media is showing you a firing and an apology.
They're NOT showing you that the Chairman himself confirmed Thune asked Presler to stay away — and that a censure resolution against Thune is already on the floor.
This is the most damaging internal GOP moment in South Dakota in years.
Follow now → Twitter is suppressing this story. RT so others see what really happened.
Prepare accordingly. 🚨🚨🚨
I'm posting things here you won't see anywhere else. Follow before that changes.
Here's some ground rules for this coming weekend:
1. Don't wish me a Happy Memorial day. There is nothing happy about brave men and women dying.
2. It's not a holiday. It's a remembrance.
3. If you want to know the true meaning, visit Arlington or your local VA, not freaking Disney.
4. Don't tell me how great any one political power is. Tell me about Chesty Puller, George Patton, John Basilone, Dakota Meyer, Kyle Carpenter, Mitchell Paige, Ira Hayes, Chris Kyle and any other heroes too numerous to name. Attend a Bell Ceremony and shed some tears.
5. Don't tell me I don't know what I am talking about. I have carried the burden all too many times for my warriors who now stand their post for God.
6. Say a prayer... and then another.
7. Remember the Fallen for all the Good they did while they were here.
8. Reach out and let a Vet know you're there, we're losing too many in "peace".
Carry on! 🇺🇸 🙏- Johnny Cadillac
The production of Christopher Nolan received permission for 15 days of filming in Greece with a budget of 16 million euros. The Greek state gave them 6 million as a subsidy from the money of Greek taxpayers, who were never informed about the cast of the film or the distortion of the most important work in our history.
The issue here is not that they received money. We Greeks would gladly have given all 16 million for Nolan to shoot a faithful Odyssey. But it should have been a film that properly represents us Greeks, Hellenism and stays true to the values and writings of Homer. Not so we Greeks could pay for a Black Helen and Clytemnestra, a Batman-like Agamemnon, a trans Achilles or Elpenor (a woman playing a male role), a Black Athena, and a script based on the worst possible "translation" that exists.
In short, Nolan disrespected all Greeks, while the Greek people are now officially in the crosshairs of racism and the falsification of their history and culture. Woke Hollywood must die.
Under PA law, Trying to overturn an election by counting illegal ballots carries a penalty of up to 7 years in prison and/or a fine of $15,000.
This is exactly what Diane-Ellis Marseglia and Bob Harvie did.
Give me a Thumbs-Up👍, if you want them held accountable.
Just read this on fb and couldn't agree more. 💯💯💯💯
They banned a sitting president from Twitter. They impeached him twice. Jailed his supporters, raided his home, and indicted him 4 times.
Got on T.V. and told us that we're the fascists.
Being a liberal isn't just about being stupid. It's about showing the world how proud you are to be stupid.
Credit to respective owner.
The spoiled Swedish yacht princess finally went too far. The State Department has officially flagged her passport and revoked every single visa — she is no longer welcome on American soil.
“Ms. Thunberg used divisive and violent language that her followers in the US might take to heart,” said State Department Spokesman Joe Barron. She threatened President Trump on Instagram
“She is, therefore, no longer welcome here.”
Norway’s Prime Minister has already been told to keep their whiny little mascot at home where she belongs.
Let the angry, tantrum-throwing climate hypocrite go scream at her own government for once instead of flying here to lecture and threaten real Americans.
America is finally done with this foreign nuisance.
Share this everywhere if you’re loving these globalist brats getting the boot
Alright. I need everyone to look at this.
Not skim it. LOOK AT IT.
Because what happened in the last 24 hours on this platform is one of the most breathtaking displays of coordinated dishonesty I have ever seen from elected officials -- and I have been watching these people for a long time. I am a science teacher. I grade papers for a living. I know when someone copied.
They ALL copied.
Let me show you exactly what I mean.
@SenWarren: "safe and effective" @PattyMurray: "safe and effective" @RonWyden: "safe, full stop" @RepJohnLarson: "safe and effective. Full stop." @RepBeccaB: "safe and effective" @RepDelBene: "safe & effective" @RepGregStanton: "safe and effective" @SenatorHassan: "safely used for years" @SenatorHick: "safe and FDA approved" @TeamPelosi: "access to mifepristone" SenatorCantwell: "safe medication" SenMarkey: "SAFE and LEGAL" repdeliaramirez: "safe and reliable"
That is not a coincidence. That is a MEMO. Someone in the DNC wrote those words, sent them to every caucus member, and these supposed independent representatives of the American people just... pasted it in. Changed a word here. Added an exclamation point there. Slapped their name on it.
And then had the audacity to call YOU their constituent.
Here is the part that should make your blood boil regardless of where you stand on abortion: these people are telling you -- openly, demonstrably, provably -- that they either did not read the court ruling, are not smart enough to understand what they read, or are perfectly fine lying to your face because they think you are too stupid to check.
Pick one. Those are the only options.
Here is what the ruling ACTUALLY says -- you know, the document none of them apparently opened:
The Fifth Circuit issued a TEMPORARY STAY of the 2023 FDA rule change that allowed mifepristone to be mailed without any in-person medical visit. The drug is NOT BANNED. Not restricted from in-person dispensing. Not removed from any shelf anywhere. It is back to the rule that existed for TWENTY YEARS from 2000 to 2023 -- a rule that nobody called a "nationwide abortion ban" at the time because it was not one then and it is not one now.
The ruling was triggered by the FDA's OWN ADMISSION that the 2023 rule had "procedural deficits" and a "lack of adequate consideration." Biden's Autopen's own agency admitted it FAILED to adequately study whether mailing the drug without in-person oversight is safe. The court held the FDA to its own documented standards. That is not extremism. That is administrative law.
But sure. Tell your constituents it is a nationwide abortion ban. His dog's trying to teach him new tricks and getting nowhere.
Now. Let me go through the highlight reel.
@PattyMurray and @SenatorHassan and @RepGregStanton. Oh boy. Sen. Murray wrote "This ruling is an attack on every woman's right to make her own health care decisions, and it must not stand." Sen. Hassan wrote "This ruling is an attack on every woman's right to make her own health care decisions, and it must not stand." Rep. Stanton wrote -- I want you to read this carefully -- "This ruling is an attack on every woman's right to make her own health care decisions, and it must not stand."
WORD. FOR. WORD.
Three separate officials. Three separate states. One brain between them and they are sharing it on a rotating schedule. Isn't it dangerous to use your whole vocabulary in one sentence? Because apparently they only have the one.
@SenWarren decided that "a conservative court packed with Trump-appointed judges" was the headline -- except, Senator, one of the three judges on that panel is a George W. Bush appointee. That is a fact available to anyone who spent thirty seconds on the first page of the ruling. You did not spend thirty seconds. You spent zero seconds. And then reported to your constituents anyway. Running on dial-up in a fiber-optic world and mad at the court for having internet.
@RonWyden called it "a nationwide abortion ban." Full stop. Thirty years in the Senate. The man has been in that chamber since 1996. He has seen more legislation than most people have had hot meals. And his contribution to this moment is a tweet calling a mailing rule stay "a nationwide abortion ban." Thirty years of accumulated nothing. I could eat a bowl of alphabet soup and poop out a more accurate legal summary than that.
@repdeliaramirez called for making "#RoeVWade the law of the land." In response to an Administrative Procedure Act ruling about an FDA mailing regulation. These are DIFFERENT CASES. Different courts. Different legal questions. Different decades. She does not even know what she is commenting on. More confused than a chameleon in a bag of Skittles and still found a way to get 2,000 retweets on it.
@RepBeccaB actually said -- and I quote -- "Whether it's taken at home or in a medical setting has no impact on that fact." No impact. The FDA's own label reports 2.9 to 4.6 percent of women prescribed mifepristone IN PERSON require emergency care. The court record explicitly states mailing without oversight INCREASES those risks. The setting has a documented, quantified, FDA-certified IMPACT on patient safety outcomes. She told her constituents the exact opposite of what the FDA's own documentation states. That is not a misunderstanding. That is a lie with a congressional letterhead.
@SenMarkey said "blocking access to it isn't about safety -- it's about control." Senator. The court's ENTIRE analysis -- all 18 pages -- was about safety. Specifically the FDA's own admission that it never adequately studied the mailing safety. The court cited the FDA's documented safety failures. You told Massachusetts the court ruling about safety is not about safety. I genuinely do not know what your problem is, but I am guessing it is hard to pronounce.
@TeamPelosi -- the former Speaker of the House of Representatives -- said Republicans "don't like birth control." Mifepristone is not a birth control medication. Birth control PREVENTS pregnancy. Mifepristone terminates an EXISTING pregnancy. These are pharmacologically and legally distinct categories that a Speaker of the House should be able to distinguish. The pilgarlic performance from someone who once wielded the Speaker's gavel is genuinely something to behold.
@amyklobuchar -- to be fair -- was the ONLY one who got close to accurate. She said "by mail" instead of inventing a ban. She gets half a point for basic literacy. The bar is subterranean and she barely cleared it but she cleared it. You bring everyone so much joy, Senator. You know, when you leave the room. But still.
@CAgovernor Gavin Newsom joined the party. Not a member of Congress -- a governor. But same talking points, same memo, same lies. Newsom is the same guy who apparently once said Governor Greg Abbott "doesn't have the backbone." Governor Abbott, for anyone who does not know, is paralyzed from the waist down due to a severed spine from a 1984 accident. Newsom has more nerve than spine, which is apparently the qualification for running California into the ground.
Here is the thing that keeps me up at night. Not the politics. The PATTERN.
If a CITIZEN lies to a member of Congress, that is a federal crime under 18 U.S.C. Section 1001. Up to FIVE YEARS in federal prison. Substantial fines. That is what happens when YOU lie to THEM.
If a member of Congress lies to 335 MILLION citizens?
That is just a Friday.
And that Friday apparently comes with a DNC memo and a coordinated social media rollout and zero accountability whatsoever.
Trying to reason with some of these folks is like trying to baptize a cat. But I am going to keep doing it anyway -- because SOMEBODY has to drag these lies into the light, and I have tenure, a science background, and nothing but time.
@RepPressley@SenWarren@RoKhanna@PattyMurray@RonWyden@SenatorCantwell@SenatorHassan@RepJohnLarson@RepBeccaB@RepDelBene@RepGregStanton@amyklobuchar@repdeliaramirez@SenMarkey@SenatorHick@TeamPelosi@CAgovernor
You are all on record. Every lie. Every talking point. Every copy-pasted word.
And I am just getting started.
America was founded by geniuses. These people are proof the trend did not hold.
But what do I know -- I am only a science teacher and Army combat medic who read the 18-page ruling, can define arbitrary and capricious agency action, knows the difference between a mailing rule and an abortion ban, and understands that when fifteen elected officials post the SAME WORDS on the SAME DAY about a ruling NONE OF THEM CITED -- that is not democracy. That is a poltroon parade dressed up as representation.
IF THIS MADE YOU THINK: LIKE this post so the algorithm shows it to people who need to read it. SHARE this -- every single share matters. There is someone on your timeline right now being lied to by one of these names. COMMENT "YES" below if you want me to keep calling them out by name. One by one. With receipts. Because I have all of them.
JOIN Bski's Classroom community on X or YouTube. Subscribe to my account -- about the cost of a cup of coffee a month. Your support keeps this classroom open. And I promise I will never run out of material as long as the left keeps trying to out-dumb itself.
@JoJoFromJerz@GuntherEagleman@catturd2
#MAGA #Veterans #Trump
Let me add one more thing. And yes, I am going to repeat it. Because it is THAT important and some things deserve to be said twice.
Quinn's Law Number One: "Liberalism always generates the exact opposite of its stated intent."
Read that again.
Every. Single. Time.
These fifteen officials told you they are fighting FOR women. They told you they are protecting women's health. They told you this ruling puts women's lives at risk.
But here is what they did not tell you -- because not one of them read the ruling.
The FDA's OWN safety label states that 2.9 to 4.6 percent of women prescribed mifepristone IN PERSON require emergency care. The court record -- the 18 pages none of them opened -- explicitly documents that mailing the drug WITHOUT in-person medical oversight INCREASES those emergency care risks. Louisiana showed $92,000 in Medicaid costs from real women who ended up in real emergency rooms from mifepristone complications in 2025 alone. Nearly 1,000 cases per month.
The court reinstated in-person oversight BECAUSE women were being harmed.
Let that land.
The ruling these members of Congress are calling an "attack on women" was issued BECAUSE women were getting hurt WITHOUT proper medical supervision. The in-person requirement they are screaming about EXISTS to make sure a doctor is present when complications occur. Reinstating it is not a war on women. It is a basic medical safety standard that these officials -- in their coordinated, memo-driven, copy-pasted outrage -- are actively fighting to REMOVE.
Quinn's Law Number One. They say they are protecting women. Their position, if it succeeded, would result in MORE women in emergency rooms with NO doctor present. The exact opposite of their stated intent. Every single time. Without exception. You could set a watch by it.
I want to say that one more time for the people in the back who are still reading the talking points memo instead of the court document.
THEY. ARE. FIGHTING. TO. REMOVE. MEDICAL. OVERSIGHT.
FOR WOMEN.
While telling you they are protecting women.
And here is the part that should stop you cold. Not one -- NOT ONE -- of the fifteen names I tagged in this post can tell you what a woman IS. Their party spent years insisting that only a biologist can define a woman. Well. I am a science teacher. I will do it for free.
A woman is an adult human female -- the sex of an organism that produces large gametes, organized around ovarian development and the reproductive anatomy that supports gestation. That definition comes from developmental biology, evolutionary biology, endocrinology, and medicine. It is in the textbooks. It is not controversial in any field that studies living organisms.
But ask @SenWarren. Ask @PattyMurray. Ask @RoKhanna. Ask @repdeliaramirez -- who cannot even identify which court case she is commenting on, let alone which biological category she is defending.
They cannot define a woman.
They cannot tell you what a woman is.
But they are absolutely certain -- CERTAIN -- that they know what is best for women's bodies, women's healthcare, and women's lives.
And they know it so thoroughly, so completely, so confidently, that they do not need to read the ruling. They do not need to check the FDA's own safety data. They do not need to acknowledge the real women in Louisiana emergency rooms. They do not need to define their terms. They just need the memo. Paste it in. Hit send. Collect the fundraising email donations that go out twenty minutes later.
That is not advocacy. That is not protection. That is not fighting for anyone.
That is using women as a political prop by people who cannot even name what a woman is -- while simultaneously fighting to strip away the medical supervision that exists specifically to keep women safe.
Quinn's Law Number One. The exact opposite. Every time.
I am a science teacher. I have spent my career explaining how the natural world actually works rather than how people wish it worked. Reality does not care about your talking points. Biology does not care about your memo. And the women in those Louisiana emergency rooms do not care about your fundraising email.
The truth is the truth whether or not fifteen members of Congress choose to read it.
But what do I know -- I am only a science teacher who can define a woman, read a court brief, interpret FDA safety data, and identify when the people claiming to protect someone are actively making the situation more dangerous for that someone. Apparently a rare combination on Capitol Hill.
Comment YES below if you want me to keep going. Because I have more names, more lies, and more receipts than they have talking points.
@JoJoFromJerz@GuntherEagleman@catturd2
#MAGA #Veterans #Trump
Fucking finally.
Brian Harpole just dropped the hammer...a federal defamation and civil conspiracy suit against Candace Owens, her LLCs, GeorgeTom Inc., and that Fort Huachuca fabulist Mitchell Snow...and it is long, viciously overdue.
The man who spent years putting his body between Charlie Kirk and every credible threat now gets to drag Owens into open court for what she is;
a predatory opportunist who weaponized a national tragedy to manufacture a conspiracy so grotesque it makes her Macron birth-certificate fever-dream look like amateur hour.
Let’s speak with cold legal precision, because this isn’t “free speech.”
This is defamation per se with actual malice screaming from every pixel.
Under Tennessee and federal standards, Harpole doesn’t even have to prove special damages...the false accusation that he orchestrated Charlie Kirk’s assassination is libelous on its face.
Owens took a witness of convenience (Snow), fed him a narrative, amplified it across her podcast, X feed, and every grift-adjacent platform, then doubled down while Kirk’s blood was still warm on the pavement at Utah Valley University.
That isn’t journalism.
That is reckless fabrication calculated to destroy a man’s reputation, livelihood, and safety.
Psychologically, this is textbook narcissistic supply run amok.
Owens has built an entire late-career brand on betrayal theater...former allies, former employers, former truths...all sacrificed at the altar of relevance.
Kirk’s assassination gave her the ultimate macabre stage:
turn the security chief into the villain, paint Erika Kirk as co-conspirator, sprinkle in “military brass at Fort Huachuca,” and watch the donations and clicks pour in.
It’s not incompetence.
It’s malevolent pattern recognition.
She doesn’t chase truth; she chases the dopamine hit of being the only one “brave enough” to say the quiet part loud, even when the quiet part is pure, weaponized fiction.
The psychology of the grifter is always the same:
when your relevance depends on perpetual outrage, every corpse becomes content.
And now the walls close in.
Discovery is going to be a bloodbath.
Depositions. Emails. DMs. Phone records.
Every single iteration of that “eyewitness” story gets shredded under oath.
Snow will either fold or perjure himself.
Owens’s “research” will be exposed as the lazy, self-serving echo chamber it always was. She can hide behind “I’m just asking questions” all she wants...courts don’t give a fuck about your podcast persona when the plaintiff is a man whose entire professional life was torched by your lies.
This isn’t just one lawsuit.
It’s the first domino in what should be a goddamn avalanche.
Harpole isn’t the only one whose life Owens tried to detonate for sport.
More are coming. And when the judgments start stacking, when the liens hit those LLCs and that smug little empire of conspiracy cash, maybe...just maybe...the rest of these performative truth-tellers will remember that free speech still has a price tag when you decide to assassinate someone’s character for sport.
Candace, you built your brand on “saying the quiet part out loud.”
Enjoy the discovery, bitch.
The quiet part just got subpoenaed.
💀⚖️🗡️
THIS WAS SAID SO PERFECTLY ON FB THAT I HAD TO SHARE. 👇👇👇
“They arrested the President of the United States four times, hit him with 91 charges, indicted him on four separate cases, spied on his campaign, sabotaged his first term, jailed his supporters, raided his private residence, censored and gagged him, tried to bankrupt him, and attempted to remove him from state ballots.
When none of that worked, they tried to assassinate him—not once, but three times.
And yet they still go on national television demanding we vote for them to ‘save democracy.’ 🤔
The WHCA alleged shooter wasn’t some nut job lurking on the fringes of society, forgotten by the system. He was well-educated, credentialed, employed, and institutionally formed. That’s what makes this so disturbing.
At first glance, this doesn’t look like a breakdown of the system, it looks more like a product of it. Academia, media, and politics helped build the moral permission structure.
While neither ‘side’ is perfect, all I know is this:
I’m on the side that doesn’t kill people, celebrate their deaths, or fantasize about killing them just to win an election.
That’s the side I’m on. 🇺🇸”
PC: Lance Smith
A travesty @maddow ???
They ambushed me in the White House without a lawyer, hid a massive amount of exculpatory evidence, significantly and intentionally altered FBI documents, and unleashed the full force of the federal government against me, a retired U.S. Army general simply trying to continue to serve our country AND also came after my family (so spare me your false anger).
That is what a travesty looks like, Rachel. The settlements are called accountability. You might want to look that word up right after you finish apologizing to the American people for years of promoting the false Russia hoax hysteria that you nightly cried your way through on national television.
Disagree on issues of substance and importance to our nation. Agree or disagree on foreign and domestic policy, but try at least once in your life or on your show to promote what is good in America.
Dear Mr. Josh D’Amaro,
CEO, The Walt Disney Company.
I am writing to you as a concerned American and longtime supporter of the Disney brand and former Disney employee to urge you, in the strongest possible terms, to immediately remove Jimmy Kimmel from ABC’s airwaves.
What began as partisan commentary has now crossed into something far darker: a pattern of reckless, dehumanizing rhetoric that disrespects human life and contributes to the toxic climate of hatred and violence threatening our nation.
Keeping Mr. Kimmel on your network is no longer merely a programming decision—it is a serious and dangerous mistake that reflects poorly on Disney’s values and leadership.
Consider the facts.
On September 15, 2025, following the cold-blooded assassination of Charlie Kirk—your company’s own employee used his national platform to declare:
“The MAGA gang [is] desperately trying to characterise this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it.”
This was not neutral commentary. It was a deliberate attempt to smear millions of Trump supporters and shift blame away from the actual killer before the facts were known. ABC temporarily suspended the show amid justified outrage and FCC scrutiny. Yet Disney chose to reinstate him—an unfathomable decision that signaled tolerance for this kind of inflammatory rhetoric.
Just days ago, on April 23, 2026, Mr. Kimmel escalated further in a pre-taped sketch. Mocking the First Lady of the United States, he said:
“Of course, our First Lady, Melania, is here. Look at her, so beautiful. Mrs. Trump, you have a glow like an expectant widow.”
He later claimed this was merely “a light roast joke about their age difference.” Yet he never said that on air. The implication was unmistakable—and chilling: that Melania Trump appears radiant at the prospect of becoming a widow. In the days that followed, another armed gunman stormed the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, marking the third assassination attempt on President Trump in recent years.
Mr. D’Amaro, this is not comedy. This is the kind of dehumanizing language that lowers the threshold for violence. When a major network platform repeatedly portrays the President, his family, and his supporters as legitimate targets for contempt, or worse, violence, it does not entertain; it incites.
Disney has long marketed itself as America’s family entertainment company—the proud steward of Walt Disney’s legacy of wholesome, non-partisan storytelling that brings people together. Yet by protecting and platforming an individual who has shown such blatant contempt for basic human decency, you are allowing that legacy to be stained.
If another act of political violence occurs—and the pattern of escalating rhetoric followed by real-world attempts on the President’s life suggests it very well could—the blood will not be only on the hands of the deranged perpetrator. It will also rest on those who continued to give a national megaphone to the hatred that helped create the climate for it.
The Walt Disney Company once stood for something higher than partisan score-settling. Your viewers—families across America—expect and deserve better. Removing Jimmy Kimmel is not censorship; it is moral leadership.
It is the bare minimum required to restore trust in your brand and to affirm that Disney will not profit from content that disrespects life and fans the flames of division and hatred in America.
I respectfully urge you to act decisively. The eyes of the nation—and history—are watching.
Sincerely,
Rob Schneider