@GOLF_com that explanation was completely contradictory. when saying "taking the stance may breach the rule without penalty but inadvertently breaching the rule is still a penalty" the explanation proved the subjectivity of an ambiguous rule.
Now apply that level of strictness to everyone
@LangmanVince his swing path footprint is minimal, he woukd have had to step behind his ball. He stepped to the right of the ball with a near vertical swing.
There was likely no infraction per se, but there are varying interpretations to an ambiguous rule.
@Top100Rick The rule is too ambiguous and obviously the rules officials don't understand how to limit the footprint of the swing path in a buried lie like that.
@LeeKuanYimby@PamelaGeller if people like you weren't late to the party, he would not be in office.
You should be apologizing profusely and running a recall campaign.
You're post is just as pathetic as your politics.
@marklevinshow if you don't have a agreement, there is nothing that Iran can break. He needed an agreement that had some clout for them to break, so he can get the next phase of deconstructing Iran.
@BreitbartNews "Subject to the jurisdiction" means LEGALLY in the US.
They are not subject to jurisdiction they are illegal invaders subject to deportation without trial.
But of course idiots don't understand this.