"The entire coup against Jensen Huang can be halted by asking a single question. What evidence is there that Alice Huang is actually a Chinese spy? The answer, unsurprisingly, is absolutely zero."
๐จ BREAKING: The FCC accepts SpaceX's application to acquire nationwide 800 MHz spectrum
Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile all told SpaceX "NO" when it asked to use their networks. SpaceX is building its own:
This deal with Grain Management secures 546 paired licenses covering ~100% of the U.S. population, on 800 MHz low band that penetrates straight through walls and already works with almost every smartphone.
Once it closes, SpaceX will hold up to 89 MHz of spectrum in every market it touches.
Elon Musk: "This is the last critical piece of the spectrum puzzle needed for SpaceX to provide complete phone coverage in America."
ITS HAPPENING
Built to play. Not to pet. Enter for a chance win!
Follow and repost with #XbiteSweepstakes for a chance to win the one-of-a-kind playable XBOX Series X-BITE.
No Purchase Necessary. US/DC/PR 18+. Ends on 11/10/26. Rules: https://t.co/tngcGpYvRR
We're giving away a Hogwarts Legacy custom wrapped NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 to celebrate its official release with DLSS 5 ๐ช
To enter:
๐ข Share this post
๐ข Comment #RTXON
Terms and Conditions: https://t.co/45T3R732hf
BREAKING: Stablecoin Account is live in Samsung Wallet, across 82 million compatible Galaxy devices.
Buy, hold and send USDC on Solana from the same wallet Galaxy users already open for cards, boarding passes and IDs.
Text messages with a machine, in and of themselves, are not criminal, immoral, or dangerous, for there is no victim, whatever the content. It is the very same thing as with thoughtsโregardless of the content, no thought can be said to create a victim.
โข If someone steals info and feeds it into an LLM, it was the theft itself which created the victim, not the subsequent text message.
โข If someone uses the output of an LLM to hack a system, it is that subsequent hack which creates the victim, not the text message preceding it.
โข If someone threatens harm to themselves or others through messages into a machine, here still the messages themselves cannot be said to have created any victim.
Imagining otherwise inappropriately reorients blame from its rightful place: the action of harm actually done by a perpetrator. Thinking harm =/= harm.
As humans integrate AI as an extension of their mind, policing at the message layer means to increasingly police thought itself.
Which company, which committee, do you trust to police your thoughts? Or do you simply want the thoughts of others policed, and not your own?
BREAKING: Alphabet is securing its own digital assets on Solana.
Google unveils Google Multi-Party Compute today, an institutional custody system now in private preview with major financial institutions. Commercial launch early 2027.
New all-time high. @AskVenice burned $24,163 worth of $VVV on Monday, the first day ever above $24k and $1,208 past the Oct 15 record. Plus $402.2k in new-signup and credit revenue, $3,760 off the all-time high. On a Monday ๐ฅ https://t.co/VuPiu8A7p6
Tim's making a really important point here and I think people fundamentally misunderstand it.
Let's paint a scenario. You are an indie developer and you want to make a game.
Traditional game development will take you 1 year and cost you $200,000 in outsourcing costs to buy art, animation, and additional programming resources.
AI assisted game development will take you 3 months and cost you $50,000 in credits + some additional resources.
In a good scenario your game could make $200,000 and break even, but in many scenarios you mortgage your house and no one sees your game and you are out your savings.
Now, with the anti-AI mania, Valve is forcing real economic harm on you because you get the equivalent of hate mobs at your door for your choice of tooling.
Your economic viability is harmed because Valve chooses to put a label on you that generates negative attention. It makes your economics worse.
Anti-AI proponents will point out that this proves their hate campaigns work. The appeal is not to them, because they are morons, but to developers to stand up to Valve and say remove these labels so that we can have livelihoods. And Valve makes money of you either way.
Stand up for your rights, devs!
This is one of the great virtues crypto has offered to the world: affording relative privacy to the individual, while enabling unprecedented transparency and verifiability of certain financial flows of a company or protocol.
Real transparency through opt-in market-based provable mechanisms > feigned transparency through regulatory diktat