I’m a dermatologist. I’m supposed to say there is no amount of safe sun exposure.
But I won’t, because that’s a lie.
The attached shows how much sun is safe in different cities at different times of year.
What do I mean by ‘safe’?
I mean this: UV causes DNA damage and skin cancer.
But, shockingly, your body repairs that damage. As long as the damage doesn’t outpace repair and start accumulating it shouldn't increase your risk of skin cancer.
Data just came out that tells us how much UV you can get without damage accumulating.
They took the people most susceptible to DNA damage from UV and exposed them to UV, then did skin biopsies to measure the damage, then more skin biopsies to measure the repair, and repeated it daily for 4 days.
At 1.6 ‘Standard Erythemal Dose’ (SED) there was no accumulation of damage.
So, the attached charts show how much sun it takes to get 1 SED in different cities at different times of the year at different times of day.
And there are extra safety margins built in. It assumes a perfectly clear day with zero air pollution and that the sun is hitting your skin perpendicularly. Unless you’re laying flat, most sun is hitting you at an angle, which isn’t nearly as intense.
But a bigger question you might be asking is ‘Why would a dermatologist be telling you to get sun in the first place?’
Because getting sun reduces your risk of death.
Mostly by reducing your risk of heart attacks and strokes. That is very well proven.
But it’s also very likely that sun exposure reduces your risk of autoimmune disease, dementia, cancer and depression. It’s just not as well proven as the protection against heart attacks and strokes.
And before you reply and say ‘just take vitamin D!’, know that it has been ROBUSTLY proven that vitamin D has little (if any) benefit for preventing any of the above. Vitamin D is mostly useful as a marker of if you’re getting enough sun.
What do I do myself and what do I tell my patients?
Get as much unprotected sun exposure as you can without getting a burn.
That’s my GUESS as to what has the best risk/benefit ratio. Dying of skin cancer is actually really rare, especially when compared to the risk of heart attacks, strokes, autoimmune disease, dementia and other cancers.
But I’ll admit it’s not for sure best to get as much sun as possible, since sun does increase the risk of skin cancer and it might be the case the benefits plateau at a low level.
So, if you’re really worried about skin cancer stick to the charts.
The best science I can find says that amount won’t cause skin cancer.
The takeaway?
Sun is good for you, just don’t get a burn.
After John Steenhuisen’s latest outburst and the DA’s handling of key issues like the foot-and-mouth crisis, I’ve decided it’s time to draw a line in the sand.
The Freedom Front Plus offers clear policies: ending race-based BEE, protecting property rights, reducing state interference, backing free-market growth, strengthening border control, restoring law and order, defending mother-tongue education, scrapping the NHI, and putting South Africa’s trade interests first.
This is not about race. It is about policy, performance, and good governance.
@Read_Meee You call friends or colleagues after work, your Mom, Dad, Siblings a quick call, quick wish or msg and if you wanna call later to chat more, then say that and do it too.
A lot has been said about the @VFPlus and how they will only be attracting the Afrikaner vote. Let's do a little test. Answer this poll question but ONLY if you are voting for the VFPlus.
I will be voting VFPlus and I am:
🚨🚨 A survey of doctors revealed that 88.3% of physicians would reject chemotherapy for their own cancer treatment...
The 5-year survival rate with chemotherapy is only 2.1%, yet most oncologists only offer the "Standard of Care" to patients.
Dr. Seyfried would choose the Ivermectin and Fasting Protocol.
The Board of Directors of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has data showing that oncologists THEMSELVES would not take chemotherapy for cancer, even though they recommend chemo and radiation as the only "approved" treatment to their patients.
MacKillop and colleagues discovered that in a survey of Canadian doctors treating lung cancer, only 16% would want chemotherapy for their own treatment if they had a cancer diagnosis.
Lind and colleagues interviewed teaching oncologists in Boston and found that only 27% would take chemo for lung cancer.
"The Contribution of Cytotoxic Chemotherapy to 5-Year Survival in Adult Malignancies" cites... The overall contribution of curative and adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults is only 2.3% in Australia and 2.1% in the U.S.
Cancer treatment is a multi-billion-dollar industry.
The system profits more from lifelong chemo and radiation than from natural intervention.
Chemotherapy is not the answer for healing the body of cancer.
Glucose-Ketone Index GKI and Cancer Eradication Based on Otto Warburg's Revolutionary Research:
Cancer cells are metabolically inflexible and cannot use ketone bodies for energy when glucose is limited, unlike healthy cells.
A low GKI is achieved by restricting carbohydrates, which lowers blood glucose and increases ketone production. This deprives cancer cells of glucose while providing normal cells with an alternative energy source.
Research shows that a low-glucose environment promotes our Natural Killer (NK) cells and T cells to become even stronger, which are crucial for killing cancer.
Chemotherapy and radiation actually kill our Natural Killer NK cells, allowing cancer to return even stronger than before conventional treatment
People asked. I answered. 🙏
You wanted to know how much ivermectin paste to take.
So I made a table for you.
First, let me say this:
I know you're laughing at "horse dewormer." 🐴
I laughed too. The first time.
Then I watched people die.
And I watched some people live.
Some of them used paste.
Now I don't laugh anymore.
The dosage (simple):
1.87% ivermectin paste.
1 gram of paste = 18.7 mg of human tablets.
You need a digital scale – 0.01 gram accuracy. ⚖️
This formula is for pure ivermectin paste only.
Some brands mix it with prasiquantel. That's a different formula.
Why would anyone use horse paste?
Because in most countries, you can't get ivermectin.
Not from a pharmacy. Not from a doctor.
But you can walk into a horse supply store and buy it.
Yeah. That's how broken the system is. 😔
And for your skin?
I've seen skin cancer disappear.
People apply it. A few months later?
The cancer literally falls off.
Worst acne you've ever seen? Relief.
Fungal infections? Gone in three weeks.
So here's what I know:
✅ Paste works the same as tablets – if you measure right.
✅ Rub it on your skin – cancer spots vanish.
✅ Poor people can afford this.
I'm not a doctor.
I'm just someone who saw it with my own eyes. 👁️
Believe me or don't.
But healing is always possible.
Even if it comes from a tube meant for a horse.
#ivermectin #fenbendazole #fenben #RealHealing
🚨 IF YOU'RE TAKING IVERMECTIN, FENBENDAZOLE, OR MEBENDAZOLE, THIS IS THE PART MOST PEOPLE SKIP.
If you've looked into parasite cleanse protocols, you've probably seen the same "Binder" names appear over and over:
1) Activated Charcoal.
2) MCT Oil.
3) Wormwood.
4) Turkey Tail.
5) Lactoferrin.
The idea behind them is simple.
Many people believe supporting digestion, elimination, and overall gut health is an important part of these protocols, which is why binders have become such a big topic in parasite cleanse communities.
Some of the most commonly used binders are:
• Activated Charcoal, often used because it can bind certain substances in the digestive tract.
• MCT Oil, frequently included in gut health and parasite-related protocols.
• Wormwood, a traditional herb that has been used in wellness practices for generations.
• Turkey Tail, one of the most popular functional mushrooms in integrative health circles.
• Lactoferrin, studied for immune-related and iron-binding properties.
Whether someone follows these protocols or not, these five binders keep showing up in almost
Every parasite cleanse discussion online.
Save this post because most people talk about the medicines.
Very few talk about what they're taking alongside them.
The DA says, “Do not waste your vote on smaller parties.” Bullsh*t!
If you fall for this false line, you are probably insane enough to vote ANC.
Imagine a DA with 30% control in the Western Cape and VF Plus with 25%: Christianity protected, rates reduced, crime under control first, instead of spending 8 billion on low-income housing which entice every “tom, dick and harry” to flee their province for free housing.
Split your vote to protect Christianity and Save the Western Cape.