🇺🇲🦅stock investor, crypto holder, bond watcher, news and finance looking, posting content of that nature. Creator of Sovereignty-Globalism-Spectrum Index
Updated. Guide included.
SGS– Version 23: Matrix Engaged(Posted March 19, 2026)This is the current live version.Simple Breakdown (easy for new people to understand)What changed / what's new in v23:Speculator Role → Toggle on/off (for "what if" outside-the-matrix scenarios). Stays off by default (Truth-Seeker mode only uses real evidence).
Bloodline Tracker → Added, but only uses verifiable public records (filings, ownership, etc.). No theories.
Emergency Protocol → Stronger detection for cover-ups or heavy narrative spins (uses primary sources).
All old stuff from v22.1 stays locked in (55% freedoms, Gatekeeper, 13 safeguards, ETF check, etc.).
It keeps everything backward-compatible so old scores still make sense. How to Use SGS v23 Right Now (Super Easy Steps)Pick something → country, leader, policy, event.
Say: “SGS v23 on [thing]”
I run it with:All 13 safeguards
ETF check first
Default Truth-Seeker mode (evidence only)
Optional Speculator toggle if you want “outside matrix” view
Example commands you can copy-paste:“SGS v23 on USA”
“SGS v23 on Trump”
“SGS v23 daily outlook”
“Activate Speculator Role + SGS v23 on [topic]”
Child safety starts with parents, not the state.
Children do not independently acquire smartphones.
These devices are bought, configured, and managed by parents or carers.
No child enters the online world without an adult making that decision first.
And parents already have tools available to them.
A parent who wants a child-lock on a phone can switch one on today. For free. It is already built into modern devices. Screen-time limits, app restrictions, and content filters exist right now and are widely available.
Despite this, what is now being proposed is a shift towards mandatory, system-wide enforcement built into every device, and applied to every user.
The new Fed Chair just went on record saying AI is the biggest economic shift of his lifetime and markets are completely missing what that means (Save this).
Kevin Warsh, the newly confirmed Fed Chair declared that artificial intelligence is "perhaps as important a change in the economy, business, and households as we've had in my adult lifetime."
Before being nominated, Warsh called the current moment the most productivity-enhancing wave of our lifetimes, past, present, and future and argued in a Wall Street Journal that AI would be a significant disinflationary force that bolsters American competitiveness for decades.
Warsh's core thesis is built on a direct parallel to the 1990s internet boom.
He argues that the internet took a decade to show up in official productivity data, but the Fed under Greenspan took the bet early allowing the economy to run hotter than conventional models suggested and the result was a historic expansion with low inflation and rising real wages.
Warsh wants to make that same bet on AI, and has said "the anecdotes will be there before the data. Policymakers will have to take a chance."
But his first meeting as Fed Chair tells the more complicated near-term story.
Today, Warsh held rates steady at 3.5 to 3.75%, the fourth consecutive hold and nearly half the committee signaled they want to hike rates before year end, with nine officials forecasting at least one increase.
The reason AI infrastructure spending is currently inflationary before it is disinflationary, the $4 trillion global data center buildout is consuming steel, electrical equipment, land and skilled labor faster than it is producing productivity gains.
Warsh notably did not submit a rate forecast dot at all, the only FOMC member not to, a deliberate signal that he refuses to box himself in.
He also made a sweeping structural change to how the Fed communicates.
Warsh stripped forward guidance from the policy statement entirely and has reduced the frequency of public Fed commentary, his philosophy being that markets should react to data, not to Fed predictions.
This is a fundamental shift from the Powell era, and it means volatility around economic data releases goes up substantially from here.
The EV industry lost around $70 billion in 2024.
Expectations didn't match reality.
Prices are high, range is limited, charging is slow.
With subsidies now fading, demand is further weakening into 2026. Manufacturers overbuilt, now they're cutting back.
Ford Motor Company and General Motors are scaling down investment. Production targets are being revised. Costs are being cut.
This is what happens when policy blindly runs ahead of demand. The market pushes back.
Thomas Sowell:
“The losses are just as important as the profits, because the losses force people to stop doing things that are not working.”
“Only those who are doing things that can be self-supporting can continue.”
"Studied history" doesn't explain why professors are all left-wing.
Langbert's survey of 5,000+ professors found Communications and Anthropology at 100% registered Democrat.... literally ZERO conservative faculty.
- Religion 98.6%
- English 98%
- Sociology 97.8%
Even Engineering, the most "balanced" field, was 61.5%.
History teachers aren't left-wing, the entire academic apparatus is.
BUT THIS ISN'T BECAUSE THEY'RE SMARTER.
It's because they are more ruthless.
Marcuse's "repressive tolerance" was put into full force in the mid to late 20th century.
Leftists believed themselves to have moral license to treat right-wing thought itself as harm rather than disagreement.
This led to a hostile environment against anyone Conservative.
Then factor in administration and affirmative action policies that favour left-wing leaning groups (blacks, women, gays, etc etc).
This created two-way pressure: push out conservative faculty and students, while simultaneously stacking the deck of newcomers with leftists.
Andrew Lobaczewski called this "negative selection."
Opposing viewpoints don't get hired, given tenure, and self-select out. Moderates leave. Then all that's left is... the left.
History doesn't teach you to be left-wing. Rather, the institutions were captured at the administrative level, restructured who gets through the gate, and now launder a monoculture with heavy ideological biases as "the expert consensus."
Fred Rogers met with a child psychologist every week for 22 years to build his show. She shaped everything: every script, prop, and song. The whole point was to give a child's nervous system time to slow down. In 1984, a single regulatory decision ended all of it.
The psychologist was Dr. Margaret McFarland, who co-founded the Arsenal Family and Children's Center alongside Benjamin Spock and Erik Erikson. She and Rogers understood that the prefrontal cortex in children, the part of the brain that controls impulse, emotion, and attention, takes decades to fully develop. At the start of every episode, Rogers tied his sneakers and changed his sweater while children settled in. Those pauses were intentional, designed to help a child's nervous system shift into a calmer, more focused state.
What ended it had nothing to do with child development science. In 1984, Reagan's FCC chairman Mark Fowler abolished the advertising limits that had protected children's programming from commercial pressure. Toy companies moved within months. Between 1984 and 1985, cartoons tied to toy lines increased by 300%, from a handful of shows to more than 40 animated series. In almost every case, the toy was designed first. The cartoon was built to sell it.
Researchers later put numbers to what parents were already noticing. A 2011 study in Pediatrics from the University of Virginia tested 60 four-year-olds across three groups: one watching SpongeBob, which cuts scene every 11 seconds; one watching a slow PBS show, which cuts scene every 34 seconds; and one drawing. Nine minutes later, all three took tests on attention, impulse control, short-term memory, and problem-solving. The SpongeBob group scored significantly worse across every measure.
In the 1970s, children began watching television around age 4. Research from pediatrician Dimitri Christakis found that by 2009, the average age of first screen exposure had dropped to 4 months, as the content got faster and the audience got younger. Researchers separately found that each additional hour of daily screen time at ages 1 or 3 raised the risk of attention problems at age 7 by 9%.
Alot of states said if you want you and your family to participate in society. Like going to work or kid allowed in school or even go out to a store. You needed to be vaccinated.... they "forced" plenty of people to get it. I believe these numbers are accurate. I know many around me that have taken the shot for these reasons. Shoot some even took it for a few extra bucks or some free food...
Malcolm Roberts explains why the United Nations should be allowed to collapse.
"These regimes are effectively farming their own people for poverty to cash in on Western aid.
They have no incentive to fix their countries.
Indeed, the UN actively encourages them to make the situation worse.
Politicians with an ideological commitment to multilateralism wrap the UN in virtue to protect a narrative of global governance that is just as fake and cynical as the climate apocalypse.
They will stand before voters and preach ‘world peace’ while money they donate from the Treasury lines some violent thug’s palace with gold and our own citizens sleep on the street."
Article | https://t.co/nwUw4A2WUP
Mark Carney on tape: “When voters said no to our ESG agenda, we went around democracy.” @MarkJCarney
He’s now Prime Minister.
Let that sink in. 🇨🇦💀 #cdnpoli
“Dependence was seen as the key to holding the slaves down. It’s ironic that the same principle comes up in the welfare state 100 years later.”
— Thomas Sowell
1. Christine Cotton è uno dei ricercatori che scoprì che solo a 252 dei 43.448 volontari nello studio clinico di Pfizer era stata iniettato con il vero vaccino mRNA messo in commercio da Pfizer, mentre a tutti gli altri un altro vaccino di alta qualità prodotto diversamente.
🚨💊⚠️ WAKE-UP CALL: YOUR DOCTOR AND HOSPITAL COULD BE THE THIRD LEADING CAUSE OF DEATH! 😱💀
Friends, this one hits hard. A powerful new post just dropped exposing a jaw-dropping year-long study that confirms what many of us have suspected for years: medical errors and iatrogenic harm are literally one of the top killers in America.
Estimates run as high as a QUARTER OF A MILLION deaths every single year from preventable mistakes — wrong meds, surgical errors, hospital infections, misdiagnoses, and more.
That’s not conspiracy. That’s cold, hard data the medical establishment has been downplaying for decades.
Third leading cause of death… right behind heart disease and cancer. And some experts argue it’s actually #1 when you factor in underreporting and the full picture.
We’ve been sold the lie that “trust the experts” and popping pills is the path to health.
But the system itself is breaking people.
Over-medication, rushed procedures, vaccine coercion, ventilator protocols that caused harm — the list of iatrogenic tragedies keeps growing.
It’s time to reclaim our power! 🌿❤️ Prioritize real food, movement, sunlight, stress reduction, and informed consent. Get second (and third) opinions.
Question everything. Become your own health advocate. Prevention beats treatment every single time.
🌟 This post is a must-read reality check packed with the receipts. Don’t scroll past it — share it far and wide so more people open their eyes before it’s too late! 🌟 It’s the beginning of knowing that if you needed a hospital, you had better protect yourself!
What’s the Solution @ourptrights !?
BUT FIRST: What’s your experience with medical errors or over-treatment? Drop it in the replies — let’s talk truth! 👇💬
See 🔗 ⬇️ and THE SOLUTION ⬇️!
#MedicalFreedom #IatrogenicDeath #HealthAwakening #QuestionBigPharma #DoctorShowTruth 🔥🛡️💉🚫🌍
When Vaccines Rolled Out and Players Were Forced to Take Them, Sudden Cardiac Arrest in Pro and Semi-Pro Athletes Rose Tenfold.
European professional and semi-pro sports leagues — larger in total player count than US pro sports — became a real-world data set. A peer-reviewed study found a tenfold increase in sudden cardiac arrest in players under age 35 in 2021, coinciding directly with vaccine mandates. Athletes quickly learned. Most leagues only ever required one dose — no boosters. If the vaccines were truly about protection, that policy never made sense.
Join the Fight: https://t.co/rvCeXmwJ2X
Courtesy of Savage Minds @SavageMindsMag, Julian Vigo @_JVigo
Listen to the Full Episode: https://t.co/EzT8dN7yr6
#MedicalFreedom
RFK Jr. says public health officials were openly lying during COVID to get Americans to comply.
“The government was not always telling the truth to the American public.”
“Science was being manipulated.”
“Regulatory officials at the highest level were openly telling what they called noble lies.”
“In order to get the public to do something that they thought they ought to be doing, they would misstate the data.”
“We’re not doing that anymore.”
“We tell them what we know and what we don’t know.”
“We’re not gonna fill gaps by lying to people.”
“We’re gonna fill them by doing the research that should’ve been done.”
In 1980, the four largest meatpackers in the United States controlled about 36 per cent of the beef market.
Today, four companies, Tyson, JBS, Cargill, and National Beef, control roughly 85 per cent of it. Two of them are Brazilian-owned. The decisions about how American cattle are bought, processed, and priced are increasingly made overseas.
This is not a new problem. Congress passed the Packers and Stockyards Act in 1921 precisely to break the stranglehold of the meat trust of that era. A century later the stranglehold is back, tighter than before, with one fewer company holding it.
The rancher who raises the animal is squeezed at one end. The shopper who buys it is squeezed at the other. The four firms in the middle are both the only buyers and the only sellers, and they set both prices.
When a single plant shut during the pandemic, national beef supply could drop by a fifth overnight. That is what a food system with four points of failure looks like.
The cattle are spread across half a million ranches. The control over them sits in four boardrooms.
Bayer-Manager:
"Wir hätten eine 95%ige WEIGERUNGS RATE gehabt, wenn wir den Leuten gesagt hätten, es sei GEN-THERAPIE. Deshalb nannten wir sie stattdessen "Impfstoffe".
mRNA-Spritzen = Zell- und Gentherapie.
Umbenannt, um die Öffentlichkeit zu täuschen.
Things modern medicine has been certain about, in chronological order, since 1900:
- That cigarettes were healthy.
- That margarine was healthy.
- That asbestos was inert.
- That lead in petrol was inert.
- That thalidomide was safe in pregnancy.
- That radium was a tonic.
- That DDT was safe to spray on children.
- That lobotomies cured depression.
- That morphine was non-addictive.
- That OxyContin was non-addictive.
- That mercury in dental fillings was inert.
- That cholesterol caused heart disease.
- That saturated fat caused heart disease.
- That eggs caused heart disease.
- That red meat caused cancer.
- That seed oils were heart-healthy.
Modern medicine has, in each case, eventually been forced to reverse the previous certainty.
It has not, in any of the above cases, apologised.
The certainty was, in each case, supported by the published consensus of the time.
The consensus of the time was, in each case, wrong.
The certainty currently in force, on the same model, is, on a longer view, statistically very unlikely to be entirely right.
The doctor reading the next reversal, in 2045, will be the one prescribing the current consensus today.
He will not call you.
He will not write to apologise.
He will, in most cases, have retired by the time the reversal is published.
The reversal will be in the journals.
The damage will be in the patients.
The patients, by then, will be your children.
Begin reading the journals yourself.