Dig a little deeper than the Graham Canyon and the cotton candy. Senator Brady Brammer has been erasing your right to challenge the government and to defend yourself against its encroachments and assaults.
He'll brag about his track record of fighting against flavored vapes and such--every politician who does the deep state's bidding needs some sprinkles of colorful PR wins to sweeten the deal and mask his true flavors.
Research the bills he sponsored and voted for. A scorecard that omits his track record on defendant rights, governmental immunity and citizen standing is fudged by its silence in these crucial matters.
#utpol
@atensnut@Heather13536766 Sometimes the cheap, meaningless symbolic victories are the ones we eat up the most, as a distraction from things of greatest worth that we are losing.
Billions shall know Brother Joseph again.
Scripture Central reported on this. A descendant of Joseph Smith (Kimberly Jo Smith) has affirmed her belief that this is an authentic photograph of the prophet.
@erichard49@TheIronWarden Originally they were. Their points of divergence came from later teachers. All three claim authority from the same source when one gets back to the times of Abraham.
Did you know there is one provision buried in the sixth amendment that the founding fathers said is the only way a government can be held to the principles of its Constitution?
You absolutely need to learn about this power.
Please come to Enoch Moore's event tonight if you are able.
We need a critical mass who are informed.
On social media, "getting verified" has been used to imply that a platform had confirmed the authenticity of a public identity. Today, it means you paid a monthly fee so a company can place a few pixels next to your name.
That matters because the word verify comes from the Latin word veritas, meaning "truth". A blue checkmark does not make a person truthful, trustworthy, or important. It only proves that the platform system recognizes their money or has voluntarily transferred clout to them.
The SAVE Act suffers from the same problems.
It is being sold as a simple "citizens-only" voting bill. But citizenship is already required (except where it isn't, because of state-centralized voter registration and ID--The SAVE Act does not solve that problem, it entrenches it). The real issue is who controls the credential.
The SAVE Act does not restore the local, precinct-level voter qualification that existed at our nation's founding. It expands centralized documentary and database-mediated credentialing. It makes the right to vote depend on whether state and federal bureaucratic systems recognize your documents, match your records, and approve your status.
That is not the same thing as proof of eligibility to vote--not by a long shot.
A document is not independent proof when the document, the database, the verification process, and the appeal route are all controlled by the same centralized credentialing apparatus. In that model, an impartial appeal is not truly preserved. The citizen is merely routed back through the same kind of faux authority that caused the denial in the first place.
This is the same logic as social media's pay-for-clout "verification", moved into government.
A centralized credentialing system can deny recognition to real citizens, and it can wrongly grant privileges to people who are not qualified. Identity fraud is not a bug in government ID systems. It is a feature. Government-issued ID is one of the main reasons why illegal immigrants were able to vote in any of our elections in the first place. The SAVE Act doubles down on that same problem, while erasing transparency and remedies.
The constitutional solution is not to hand more electoral power to centralized bureaucracies or put more trust in computerized databases. The solution is to restore our voter credentialing safeguards to their status at the founding. Return voter qualification to the local level: precinct credentialing, local knowledge, local challenge, local evidence, and meaningful appeal outside the same bureaucracy that denied the right.
Social credit scores, nepotism, and bribery are being normalized under our noses in the name of election integrity. The SAVE Act paves the way for social credit scores and even a poll tax of bureaucratic gymnastics to be "recognized". Don't be fooled.
Let me get this straight
> 84% of Americans support requiring a photo id to vote
> every major democracy in the world does this except the US
> even under our very eyes, the mail-in ballots in California are highly suspiciously slanted toward only one party
And yet majority can’t push this through?!
This is a traitorous level of incompetence
Pass the SAVE Act!!
Maybe check the bill's other provisions that make it dishonest to pretend that it is only about ensuring that citizens can vote.
Previous to NVRA, HAVA and SAVE:
-Voters credentialed at the PRECINCT level
-Credentials (including residence and citizenship) could be challenged by the locals
-There were no state or nationally centralized voter registration databases
-government officials did not get free data about voter turnout and voting tendencies, any more than anyone else
Post-NVRA, HAVA and SAVE Act:
-State and Federal bureaucracies could deny your right to vote by withholding verification of your identity and voting credential
-State and Federal bureaucracies can also issue bogus voter credentials (for example, to foreigners)
Lengthy experience has shown that identity theft is not a bug in government ID systems, it's a feature.
This means federal bureaucrats could greenlight noncitizen participation AND deny citizens the right to vote if their social credit score drops too low.
That is exactly what the SAVE Act creates.
This is already happening thanks to state and party centralized voter registration databases enabled by the bipartisan NVRA and HAVA regulations, which are unconstitutional.
The solution is to return to the constitutional way of doing things, by credentialing at the precinct level. If you want to challenge someone's voting credential, you can do so locally. If you were wrongfully denied the right to vote on the basis of such a challenge, you can appeal it. The SAVE Act deletes your right to challenge as well as your right to an impartial appeal, and gives all electoral vetting power into the hands of a select few unaccountable bureaucrats in a federal agency somewhere, by way of a computerized database.
Do you really trust them with that much power? I don't.
The global communists have infiltrated every nation.
Instead of saying "Israel did X", "Iran did Y", "Russia did Z", "Ukraine did W", or "the USA did ABC", learn to state the truth:
An enemy hath done this.
Who is the enemy?
The global communists.
How did they get into power?
For that, you will have to learn how to install and apply CHECKS AND BALANCES rather than only parroting partisan propaganda.