@DidNukes He is right about destruction of enemy army thou.
"Keep men, lose land; land can be taken again. Keep land, lose men; land and men are both lost" -Mao Zedong
@DagnyTaggart369@loooooo02942311 In the grand scheme of things, it doesnโt really matter how much Crimea get hits from these long-range weapons.
HIMARS ammunitions are limited in stockpile, and every failed attack puts NATO in a disadvantage, since they are not manufactured anymore.
@loooooo02942311@DagnyTaggart369 No, from RF point of view, it is a perfect strategy. Send these perfectly good NATO weapons into untrained Ukrainians hands just for them to get blown up.
What you see is demilitarizing of NATO, all the MiGs nato hadโฆ gone, BTRs โ goneโฆ, 1/3 of states javelins โ gone, etc etc
@Howlinghamster @DavidLarter Yes, very humane indeed.
Taking POW, and then executing in cold blood.
This is early April, close Butcha.
Units involved: Georgian + Ukrainian.
@DagnyTaggart369 Hey! Good point!
I was looking at this data for like entire summer, saw numbers how they are filling up nicely, without noticing how long these reserves would last.
Germany has 20% of annual needs, thats like max 3 months. And during winter gas needs is much higher.
Jeeez...