This is a really inspiring posts @gennyxdavila
The rapid advancement of AI has significantly boosted some professional capabilities.
However, this shift has actually highlighted the growing importance of teamwork and the human element.
So plz make people people.
Over the years of building teams I’ve realized the type of designers and teams I look for are:
- High standards, low ego.
- Strong taste and collaborative.
- People who care deeply about people, not just pixels.
@gennyxdavila Sincerely Sharing Genny!Just curious:
-how do you define "low ego" you know it's a little bit hard to make a clear line. humble for others suggestion or anything else?
And I totally agree people need to care about people.
Thank you and looking forward further sharing!
@majamediaco@HellenicVibes I believe their complaints AI in writing mainly due to
1. They haven't deeply used or understood how AI can actually empower the writing process in a positive way.
2. They are afraid that AI will take over the act of writing itself or threaten their identity as writers.
@buildwithmaya I'll keep following up on those breakthrough attempts!
BTW your content is so valuable that I think it would be even better if there were a way to make it more deeply interactive.
find this comment and the answer is "yes". The metaphor of an "elephant turning around" refers to the idea that as a company or organization grows in scale, it becomes increasingly difficult to implement change and innovation. This lack of agility can cause it to fall behind global trends and evolving user needs.
@joypbuilds wooo cool let me have a look! Thanks for sharing your sample. It's a real demand and sooo happy you and. your team discover it! I will send to vloggers around me to try it(most of them actually are shy girls hhh)
Great Sharing of @kvncnls For some product teams, they are still facing the unsolved problems:
1. Is it useful?
Many builders still define "usefulness" without ever actually engaging with real users. They either don't care or simply don't know whether they are solving genuine user pain points.
2. Is it easy to use?
It's the same issue here. Some team are overconfident in their onboarding design and assuming everything is perfectly clear and can't understand why users still struggle to use it.
3. Is it interesting?
This is the hardest one of all. To achieve all three, the founding and product teams must possess deep empathy rather than just technical skills.
I genuinely believe that the final form of builders is a combination of a Product Designer and Design Engineer.
Someone who knows product, UI/UX, business & market sense and the patience to fine-tune the little things after AI one-shots the full product.
For products, literally no one cares about how clever your backend is. That era is long gone.
Only 3 things that matter:
Is it useful? Is it easy to use? And is it fun?
I believe that "fun question" is the hardest part. We can only truly understand the significance of fun once you've addressed a product's usefulness and ease of use.
For the product itself, fun is a competitive moat. For the market and the users, it represents a new kind of solution. Developing this definitely requires more time.
@MarieAdant@UseCorgi@Lovable Welcome to X Marie!and wanna say hi to your lovely puppy(have no idea about her/his name)wanna know more things about @UseCorgi
@JunaidAckroyd explored correct but may not be accepted by most people. Working on start up team and then you will own valuable perspectives from bottom to top which most founders lack.