@PostDisclosure I feel like cntact and open coms has been happenng. It's just that humanity has dumped contactees in with the same bucket as the crazy.
"The Post Disclosure World is where certainty loses its innocence."
Skeptics aren't safe. Believers aren't safe. Scientists aren't safe. Disclosure will not arrive as a servant to anyone's preferred story. It is the death of certainty.
Are you actually ready to be stretched? 👇
The cover-up isn’t just secrecy. It is evil.
Hidden authorities decided you aren't mature enough to know humanity's true place in existence. They didn't just hide facts, they stole your right to reality.
The brutal truth about what disclosure actually means: 👇
@goodmorningufo@LegacyProgramVP Wife gave it a 9/10 . We shed a 😢 at he end. Probably because they will not listen. They havent for 80+ year. Still, we live in hope. 🙏 ❤️
While chatting with a friend yesterday, we discussed what might happen to astronomy funding after Disclosure. In my view, there is a tension between a scenario in which the first recognised evidence of extraterrestrial life comes through SETI or conventional astrobiology, and one in which Disclosure arrives through the White House, or through the small amount of academic UAP research currently being conducted.
Let us consider a scenario in which there are zero indications of UAPs in astronomical data, and astrobiologists proudly announce that planet Huntabunta-32b exhibits a rich array of biosignatures, perhaps even accompanied by a small radio-emitting moon. News of that kind would almost certainly lead to a major increase in funding for astronomy.
Now consider the alternative, and in my view, the far more realistic scenario: the White House publicly acknowledges contact with non-human intelligence (NHI) within the coming years, and confirms that UFOs are real. Given the longstanding stigma surrounding the subject within academia, and how far ahead military and intelligence communities appear to be on the UFO question compared to academic researchers, such an acknowledgment would likely trigger a significant reshuffling of research priorities and funding.
I suspect that a significant fraction of resources would shift away from traditional civilian astronomy and towards more public-facing military programmes dedicated to studying UAPs. At least during the first few years, civilian astronomers would likely struggle to adapt to the new reality and have relatively little to contribute to the discussion. The public would also inevitably ask how astronomers could have missed something so obvious as extraterrestrial presence. At the same time, certain organisations, particularly independent organizations that have supported Disclosure efforts, would become increasingly important, serving as a bridge between civilian and government research and helping to maintain scientific transparency.
For this reason, I believe many astronomers are motivated to dismiss anything related to UFOs or Disclosure. Whether consciously or not, they may recognise that a confirmed UFO reality could eventually compete with existing research priorities and funding structures.
“We stand at a pivotal moment in history. The question is no longer whether these events are real — but whether we have the courage to face them.”
🟥
Jeffrey Nuccetelli
Testimony before the U.S. House Oversight Committee
Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets
Hearing: Restoring Public Trust Through UAP Transparency and Whistleblower Protection
September 9, 2025
DOW-UAP-PR073 - DOD_111720765
Possible Class 6 via https://t.co/XMXNnivK5M
This is a cube teleporting. Probably after being told to buzz off by the sphere network. Or taken out by it.
@PatrickQJackson
DOW-UAP-PR073 - DOD_111720765
Possible Class 6 via https://t.co/XMXNnivK5M
This is a cube teleporting. Probably after being told to buzz off by the sphere network. Or taken out by it.
@PatrickQJackson
If the US Military cannot explain the objects and some are just birds / balloons. Then they have more issues then UAP. They activly have analysts and operators that are incompetent or worse malicious. 🤷♂️
**JUST IN** Jesse Watters: "Trump says more UFO files are coming - If the deep state don't get him first" 🛸👽😱
The latest UFO document dump reveals UFOs flying over military sites a US fighter jet shooting down a UFO over Lake Huron and orange orbs witnessed by a senior intelligence officer in a military helicopter.
The US military admits it cannot explain these objects. More files are on the way.
@JesseBWatters@richgel999 Hey @JesseBWatters did you see Dr. James Lacatski (head of the DIA’s UAP study program), the recipient of the 22 million in black money (there was a NY Times article about it).
He admitted this for the first time in an interview with @G_Knapp and me, on WEAPONIZED podcast.
🛸⏰
More on those weird unexplained lunar anomalies that @NASA seems too shy to talk about and the intriguing story of the STS-48 shuttle mission anomaly: The footage the Pentagon must explain: https://t.co/xOJvcgwhJB. Our latest REALITY CHECK.
Government UFO Files: Release 01 vs Release 02
The link between the two releases is not one single case. It is the pattern.
Release 01 gives the broader archive layer: Gemini 7 “bogey” audio, Apollo 17 photo analysis, Socorro FBI records, Kazakhstan 747 crew report, Greece mission reports, and the Western U.S. orb case involving multiple federal agents.
Release 02 adds a more concentrated media layer: 51 videos, 7 audio files, Sandia green-fireball files, ODNI senior intelligence officer orb narrative, DOE/Pantex radar-tower imagery, and more NASA Apollo/Mercury audio.
The overlap is what matters:
NASA spaceflight anomalies.
Military infrared/FMV sensor cases.
Orb/sphere/light language.
Witness reports sitting beside instrument or mission data.
These are not random files.
They are pieces of the same evidence map.
Dancing / showing off for the camera.
Rapid / fluid movements.
Tagging / monitoring.
Many videos re encoded pos multiple times, large quality loss.
Some can look like balloons / birds.