@cb_doge Maybe it means you should question your own narrative? Dude is taking a reckless slash and burn approach to a body he doesn’t understand, while benefiting his own companies in the process.
I’m all for reducing government waste. This isn’t the way to do it.
@StephenM This is the judicial branch of our government doing precisely what it’s supposed to do and keeping overreach from the other branches in check.
You don’t give a shit about the Constitution, or America for that matter, only your own power.
@FoxNews@elonmusk Cry me a river. Billionaire man-child recklessly cuts jobs and aid, then sobs over his riches being cut in half like he’s the victim. Bottle those tears and shove them up your ass, you absolute shitbag.
@charliekirk11 Isn't this short-term thinking? A Russian win creates the precedent that unprovoked warfare pays off, even when based on a lie (ex. Ukraine being Nazis).
Many more will die and end up fatherless through future aggressions, geopolitically justified by this one.
@TWBullish @mosdefcmkamau@elonmusk@chamath My opinion: Dems were inspired in 2020 to get Trump out. In 2024, Dems weren't happy with Biden, and Kamala represented more of the same. Uninspiring.
In 2024, Trump represented change and won fairly. But his denial of 2020 undermined faith in our elections and did lots of harm.
@Swmngwshrks@elonmusk@chamath Trump was found guilty by an independent jury of 34 counts of falsifying business records (a felony). What in that lawsuit strikes you as odd?
But the election result lie is the most important thing. It proves he doesn't give a shit about the country, or democracy, only himself.
@sburker32@mary11468311@elonmusk@chamath You've proven that there was a difference in turnout, not that there was fraud.
Show me a single legitimate news source that suggests the difference in turnout was the result of widespread fraud and not other factors (ex. Dems abandoning Biden due to Middle East policy).
@LamaAndEagle@SneakyPeaky4@elonmusk@chamath I agree with you that citizens *should* obtain an ID for voting. But the reality is, they don't.
Just being suspicious about the legitimacy of an election, with no evidence of fraud, isn't a justification for taking away someone else's right to vote.
@SneakyPeaky4@elonmusk@chamath@WSJ You're delusional buddy. You're the one who said you have no news source besides flipping the narrative.
If you think everything you read on X is true, consider this: you're a moron.
@LamaAndEagle@SneakyPeaky4@elonmusk@chamath Genuinely curious as to your take on my other response. I get how someone being against voter ID requirements might seem crazy at first, but I stand by my argument.
I'm also very open to 1) your point of view and 2) being proven wrong if you've got something.
@SneakyPeaky4@elonmusk@chamath So you have no real news source, and instead you blindly 180 the narrative. In other words: you go with an emotional opinion without any facts.
I don't pretend the MSM is 100% truthful. But the @WSJ, which leans right, will get you closer to the truth than your current approach.
@mosdefcmkamau@elonmusk@chamath I consider it "purposely dense" to ignore a blatant attempt to overturn the result of a legitimate election, as you clearly have. How do you justify it?
And by the way 12 jurors found Trump guilty of 34 counts of falsifying business records *in the first degree*. Thus: felony.