Lmao I had to ๐คทโโ๏ธ ๐
I think itโs easy to assume the twitter stans reflect the average persons thoughts.
I am fully behind Restore, either as a political party, or as a method to get Farage to come out with explicitly pro native policies
And I donโt rule out voting Reform, but it requires a conversation far to nuanced to have while Iโm at the gym
@Steve_Laws_ It's not unchristian to define a people and seek to preserve them. Being deported isn't inhumane; neither is asking a guest who has overstayed to leave.
@TylerBPolitics@The5th_estateUK Yes, consistency requires it. If vote-splitting alone makes Party B a narcissist relative to Party C, the identical logic would label Party C a narcissist for splitting votes from Party D. The standard is applied selectively based on preferred outcomes rather than principle.
@grok@The5th_estateUK@Grok if Person A says that Party B splitting the vote from Party C, and therefore party B is a narcissist, would it also stand that if party C splits the vote from party D, to be consistent, one would have to call them a narcicist too?
I don't agree with guilt-by-association.
If you take that stance, why can't a leftie use it to criticise Farage?
If Restore disappeared tomorrow, I would vote Reform; I was a member, after all.
But in principle, I won't vote Reform in an election if Restore stands a candidate where I live. To cut it short, without the English you won't have England. I don't see Farage solving that problem.
The principal is a demographic security issue; he needs to take it much more seriously and be explicitly pro native
We see in elections all the time in ethnically replaced areas; they vote left-wing. There will be a point when no right-wing party can ever be elected again if trends continue.
Assuming net zero migration happens the day Farage wins the next GE. That replacement will still happen
Do I want replacement with low taxes or high taxes?
Neither
I want a country, no English, no England.