@BPujanauski@binarybits 3) A list price of $500m doesn't necessarily mean they paid $500m. It is always possible that they made a deal to settle for much less with the AI company
@BPujanauski@binarybits 1) The article didn't say whether it was a public or private company, there are privates that are large enough
2) For a large public, I am not entirely sure whether it would actually need to be disclosed, it is highly facts and circumstances dependent
If Strategy sells MSTR to pay the dividend, it's a ponzi.
If Strategy sells Bitcoin to pay the dividend, it's a death spiral.
If Strategy sells STRC to buy Bitcoin, the common stockholders are being "diluted".
If Strategy uses the USD reserve to pay off the debt, it's a "fatal error".
At some point you have to realize the bear thesis has become a Choose Your Own Adventure book for people who hate the ending.
@MuratLite@econoar How are they employed? Polymarkets own faq doesn't suggest they are independant (in fact is suggest the opposite by saying the best way to contact them is through the official polymarket X account)
@emollick@IrvZinter People who say "LLMs are averages" in a derogotory frame will not be convinced if you tell them actually they aren't just averages, they will just give you a different reason, because the belief is upstream of the claim, not downstream.
2/2
@emollick@IrvZinter That paper seems to start out from exactly that intuition and build on it?
You can certainly argue that some people who say "LLMs are averages" think LLMs are bad, but I think that is getting the causality and reasoning backward.
1/
@emollick@IrvZinter Sure, there is tracking error and induced randomness, which is the nuance. I am not entirely sure that fighting over a directionally correct shorthand is useful. At least, I've found better ways to get my students to think differently about AI without getting into such semantics
@mitchdmoore It is not 1% better than the client could have performed on their own. It is better than the client could have performed with the next advisor choice after fees.
But even then, raw return isn't telling you if you performed better than the client could have.
@AndyMasley@Andrew_Semenza Ultimately, I would say it is the Fermi paradox again. We know it can happen because we are the one case, but with only one case, it is hard to know how common it actually is.
@AndyMasley@Andrew_Semenza I'd assume consciousness has many prerequisites (for lack of a better term) to be beneficial, unlike more common traits. So we should expect it to be a relatively recent in evolutionary history, and thus less likely to have been developed independently more than once