A lot of people wonder how the pro-Palestine/Anti-Israel protests started within hours of the Hamas terror attack and often included preprinted posters and ready made "genocide" chants. How was it so organized and "spontaneous"?
I, and other journalists, are chasing the 'follow the money' story behind the movement that appeared "out of nowhere" on October 8.
This past week, an @NGOmonitor report provided the data inside the UK experience. It maps 40 major post-October 7 protest and mobilization campaigns in the UK — and it undercuts the "spontaneous grassroots reaction" narrative that took hold right after Hamas's October 7 massacre.
The findings: At least 11 of the 40 organizations mapped have links to extremist actors — the Iranian regime and IRGC, Hamas, Hezbollah, the PFLP, or the Muslim Brotherhood — either directly or through officials who met or cooperated with them.
Leadership overlaps heavily across the six primary coordinating groups. Jeremy Corbyn—the antisemitism former Labour Party leader— alone holds posts in three of them simultaneously. The funding for Corbyn's own group, the People's Forum UK, is undisclosed.
Youth recruitment is a high priority — Amnesty International UK is cited for running an activism-training program aimed at UK youth; Friends of Al-Aqsa for youth-mobilization messaging.
—Of the 40 groups, only 10 are registered charities.
—Thirteen operate completely outside any formal UK regulatory framework — while still soliciting public donations.
—Nineteen receive UK government funding via the FCDO or Gift Aid. At least 11 draw taxpayer money from other governments too, including the US and several EU states.
—Funding also flows from major US progressive foundations — Open Society, Rockefeller Brothers Fund among them — plus, per the report, cryptocurrency channels used by CAGE and Palestine Action, the latter now a proscribed organization under UK law as of a June 2026 Court of Appeal ruling.
What the NGO Monitor report shows is a well-funded, coordinated infrastructure that existed before October 7 and moved fast because it was already built — organizationally, financially, and rhetorically — around "genocide" messaging with no space made for Israeli victims.
Here is the full report: https://t.co/mKZ52y67Oy
Katie Hopkins completely destroyed the diversity myth in one viral video.
In 2019, she confronted a mob of Pakistani Muslims in London who showed up specifically to intimidate and shut down a Hindu Diwali celebration.
Why? Because in their eyes, it was “haram” and “Islamophobic.”
This is what “multiculturalism” really looks like.
One group imports its supremacist ideology and demands everyone else submit or be silenced.
Diversity is not enriching Britain.
It is erasing it.
Share if you see the truth. 👇🇬🇧
@TolentinoTeach Capitalization is the difference between helping your uncle Jack off his horse and helping your uncle jack off his horse.
The difference is very, very important. Even, if not especially, in a text message.
Secretly ‘socially transitioning’ a young child to live in ‘stealth’ should be a criminal offence but instead our government is making special exemptions in education and healthcare to support this serious child abuse.
@HellywoodGaming@a_n_k_u_r@KosherChutzpah You know it exists, you've probably enjoyed watching it.
The international press were shown the documented evidence including the films. There's an exhibition displaying the evidence.
@HellywoodGaming@a_n_k_u_r@KosherChutzpah Rape denial seems to be a feature of the pro Islamist crowd. I understand that you lot don't think that a woman or a girl can say "no", it seems a built-in feature of your ideology.
There's statements, forensic evidence & Ham🫏 filmed it for their perverted supporters.
@a_n_k_u_r@HellywoodGaming@KosherChutzpah You just open your mouth and shit pours out 😅
Me - lucky the world isn't full of idiots who think rape & murder is resistance.
You - it is resistance. You are the only one here advocating for murder & rape.
Teenage girls 'identifying' as animals
'Queer' people saying lesbians can have penises ("Hell yeah!")
Fetish pups
Creepy AGPs
Double mastectomy scars on display
Anti-TERF signs...
My London Pride 2026 vid premieres this eve 12th July at 9PM Terf Island o'clock
Link below
#ThisIsPride
Qatar propagandist who SOMEHOW failed to find Hamas’s human shield strategy, even though they openly stated it themselves, is sad that his useful idiots are being criticised.
The global misinformation campaign surrounding Dr Hussam Abu Safiya, director of Kamal Adwan Hospital in northern Gaza, has reached fever-pitch.
Time for some home truths!
I examine the publicly available evidence, explain Israel's Incarceration of Unlawful Combatants Law and address what international humanitarian law actually says.
The international NGOs, politicians, celebrities and media broadcasters pushing this false narrative must be held to account!
Why don’t Muslims care about the Grooming Gangs?
A “British Pakistani” let the mask slip and tried to delete his comment after I re-tweeted it
Too bad I also screenshotted it…
This is how the Pakistanis really feel about the victims of the Grooming gangs
It’s time to deport millions.
Norway, by Eric Ravilious, 1940. Ravilious travelled to Norway with the Royal Navy as an official war artist during the ill-fated operations there in April 1940. Original artwork in the collection of @LaingArtGallery in Newcastle.
" @EinatWilf – prolific author on Israel and Zionism, articulate lecturer, and former MK in the Labor Party and Ehud Barak’s short-lived Independence faction – has a suggestion: Stop focusing on the trees. Look at the forest.
Each UN report, each Amnesty International document, is a tree. Stopping at each one means getting lost in the forest.
The bigger picture, Wilf contends, is far more dangerous: the relentless equation of Israel and Zionism with whatever evil is dominating the discourse at the time – imperialism, colonialism, apartheid, white supremacy, and genocide. This is part of a much broader and more pernicious campaign: instilling a global mindset that the world would be better off without the collective Jew.
This is, by no means, a new mindset – indeed, it is an ancient one, she said. It is the notion that “there is a better world out there – a world of salvation, a world of racial purity, a world of human rights, of cleanliness, and that the collective Jew stands between this world and utopia.”
She argued that the same animating idea is at work today, but few articulate it in these terms. Israel’s reaction to the UN report, therefore, should not have been localized or limited to condemning it as libel, she maintained, but rather placing it in this much broader context.
Wilf, a Jerusalem native with a BA in government and fine arts from Harvard and a PhD in political science from Cambridge, has lectured and written extensively about what she calls the Palestinian “placard strategy.”
HE WORDS on the placards themselves – “colonialism,” “racism,” “apartheid” – matter less than their endless repetition, she argued. These words appear repeatedly in protests, the media, social media, and, crucially, institutions with global prestige, like the UN, giving them a veneer of legitimacy.
Wilf recalled a former KGB officer’s observation that “prestige suspends judgment.” If a prestigious institution – a UN body, a university, a human rights organization – endorses an idea, it gains automatic respectability.
That is why, she explained, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion was so effective: 120 years ago, a book carried prestige, even if it was a fabrication.
Today, the same laundering process takes place. The formula – “Israel, Zionism, Star of David = evil” – gets reinforced through institutions that still command authority, however misplaced. Human rights organizations, academia, and the UN serve as conduits for these libels. Wilf noted that one can even earn a PhD by arguing that Zionism is colonialism. A tenure-track career can be built on the claim that Israel is an apartheid state.
CONTRARY TO popular belief, Wilf argued, Israel is not simply engaged in a PR battle. The issue is more profound: A global mindset is being shaped – one that sees the world’s problems as solvable if only Israel ceased to exist. And as was chanted repeatedly after Oct. 7, this can be achieved “by any means necessary.”
Why are all means legitimate? Because if the collective Jew is perceived as the last barrier to utopia, then any means of erasing it are justified. Wilf cited a chilling example: A placard after Oct. 7 showing an Israeli flag in a dustpan with the caption, “Keep the world clean.”
“It is not a coincidence that all the evil words are on the side of Israel, Zionism, Star of David,” she said, “and that all the good words – justice, equality, freedom, and rights – are on the side of its negation, what I have come to call ‘Palestinianism,’ which is ultimately an ideology that is built on the negation of the collective Jew.”
This is the bigger picture, she said, and one that needs to be conveyed.
Once we do this, she continued, “We need to let people understand that this is the kind of ideology that brings down societies and that you do not have any moment in history where societies become obsessed with the notion that the collective Jew stands between them and utopia, and somehow it ends well.”
Rather than merely refuting each new libelous UN report, Israel must expose the deeper pattern at play. This “virus,” she warned, has been inserted into the Western world – into the US, France, and Britain. She also said that the Jewish people historically have had a “timing problem.”
“By the time the world wakes up to how destructive these ideologies are, we often suffer the brunt of the damage,” she argued. “So we need to first of all focus on ensuring that we suffer as little damage as possible as this ideology works itself through the world, but we have allies, and we have friends. We need to help them understand what’s going on.”
Palestinianism has certain core tenets, she said, among them: From the river to the sea, there will be no Jewish state; Palestinians are perpetual refugees until “return is achieved”; return is not some “soft nostalgia” for a great-grandparent’s home – Oct. 7 is return: The erasure of Israel and Zionism is the only acceptable outcome.
Paradoxically, since he was no friend of the Jews, British foreign secretary Ernest Bevin encapsulated the essence of this “Palestinianism” in a speech he gave to Parliament in 1947 explaining why Britain was returning its mandate over Palestine to the UN.
Wilf often cites this speech: “His Majesty’s Government have thus been faced with an irreconcilable conflict of principles. For the Jews, the essential point of principle is the creation of a sovereign Jewish state. For the Arabs, the essential point of principle is to resist to the last the establishment of Jewish sovereignty in any part of Palestine.”
That, she maintains, is the essence of the conflict – having nothing to do with occupation, settlements, displacement, or even the policies of this or that Israeli government.
Wilf sees Palestinianism as an ideology of erasure. “It does not seek self-determination. It does not seek statehood. It does not seek independence. It seeks only to prevent to the last the establishment of Jewish sovereignty in any part of the land,” she said."
https://t.co/DatEc0VSky