U.S. Medical Research🇺🇸

Medical researcher. Contributing medical & peace philanthropy to humanity. This is my personal account of the data, and it does not constitute medical advice.

[U.S. Medical Research🇺🇸 @USAMedRes]

U.S. Senator Tom Cotton needs to be investigated.

[theleahfiles @leahfiles]

@SenTomCotton To be frank, you are a traitor

[Glenn Diesen @Glenn_Diesen]

When our political-media establishment chant "stand with Ukraine", it means boycotting diplomacy and finance the kidnapping of Ukrainian men to use them in a campaign to weaken Russia as a strategic rival. If the majority of Ukrainians had a say, there would not have been a regime change in 2014, the 2015 Minsk agreement would have been implemented, the 2019 peace platform would not have been reversed, the 2022 Istanbul agreement would have been signed, and there would now be negotiations about the pan-European security architecture. However, the US and EU run Ukraine, and men are hunted on the streets to fight to the last Ukrainian in NATO's proxy war.

[Secretary Kennedy @SecKennedy]

Thank you, @DNIGabbard, for exposing U.S. funded biolabs around the world. The American people deserve the truth.

[Glenn Greenwald @ggreenwald]

With Tulsi Gabbard's new revelations about US bio labs in many countries around the world including Ukraine, it's fascinating recall the bizarre series of events that gave rise to this controversy in the first place:

In May of 2022, some of us began asking whether the US had bio labs in Ukraine, what they were for, and why the US had them there. For asking those questions, we were instantly branded as "pro-Russian conspiracy theorists" in official Ukrainian intel reports, on our Wikipedia pages, by countless media outlets, etc. This was and remains one of the most bizarre episodes I've ever seen.

Before May 2022, when we asked those questions, barely anyone had ever thought about let alone asked about "bio weapons in Ukraine"! I certainly hadn't. Like most people, I had never mentioned a word about it because it had never occurred to me we had them there.

But then, Marco Rubio summoned Victoria Nuland to the Senate and asked her in a televised hearing under oath about these "rumors," clearly expecting her to immediately debunk them as obvious Kremlin lies and to proclaim the US had no such bio labs in Ukraine.

Instead, Nuland did the opposite! She *confirmed* key aspects of these "rumors," and she explicitly warned that the US has several "bio research labs" in Ukraine that are so dangerous that they must not be allowed to fall into Russia's hands.

When some of us heard Nuland's rather shocking admission -- the first-ever disclosure about these labs -- we of course asked: wait! what? Why does the US have bio labs in Ukraine, and what are the US and Ukraine doing in those labs that make them (in Nuland's eyes) so dangerous?? (Note: nobody ever suggested that the presence of these bio labs in Ukraine justified the Russian invasion; we just wanted answers about these US bio labs that Nuland had casually divulged).

We never got real answers. We got smear campaigns. To this day, our names are formally attached to claims that we spread "conspiracy theories" for asking about these labs even though it was Victoria Nuland herself who was the one who accidentally revealed them for the first time in a Senate hearing in response to a shocked Marco Rubio. They then quickly tried shutting down any questioning by pretending that Nuland never said this, and it was just a bunch of paid Kremlin mouthpieces who were spreading lies.

You see the same tactics now being against Tulsi for releasing this new intelligence report. Watch the Nuland testimony in question:

[U.S. Medical Research🇺🇸 @USAMedRes]

11/ The authors urge further research to validate findings and clarify biological mechanisms linking early heart disease and cancer development.

[U.S. Medical Research🇺🇸 @USAMedRes]

1/ Early heart changes may predict cancer years before diagnosis. A new study led by UCLA Health physician-scientists suggests that subtle alterations in heart structure and function may signal an increased risk of developing certain cancers years later.

[U.S. Medical Research🇺🇸 @USAMedRes]

10/ The findings support a more integrated prevention approach. Current heart failure guidelines recommend controlling blood pressure, obesity, diabetes, and other risks; these interventions may also aid cancer prevention.

[U.S. Medical Research🇺🇸 @USAMedRes]

5/ slow decline but do not prove causation, requiring further study on biological mechanisms.
Higher plasma vitamin C assoc. with better default mode network connectivity, suggesting a vitamin C-rich diet may help maintain brain health & reduce cognitive decline in aging adults.

[U.S. Medical Research🇺🇸 @USAMedRes]

1/ Found that individuals with lower blood plasma vitamin C had reduced gray matter volume and decreased connectivity in the default mode network.

[U.S. Medical Research🇺🇸 @USAMedRes]

4/ After controlling for age, physical activity, and education, found lower plasma vitamin C correlated with reduced gray matter and connectivity. Results imply optimal vitamin C levels might support cognition and