Bob A. Ganush

[Frankie™️🦅 @B7frankH]

Mamdani's Culturally enriched New York 🗽🇺🇸 where you can't walk your dog because it happens obviously that they hate dogs.
Look at their courage, how they become dominant over the Americans.
If you don't do something now, you will regret it tomorrow. Mamdani has no place in US.

[Zia Yusuf @ZiaYusufUK]

What does it tell us about this country that so powerful is the accusation of racism that it enables you to stab a man and have him handcuffed by the police as he bleeds to death.

[Bob A. Ganush @UncleBabaganush]

@BuzzPatterson I bought your book the day it came out. I had it on my shelf at the office. I still have it. Thank you for your service and for your courage in telling your story.

[End Wokeness @EndWokeness]

SAY HER NAME: Stephanie Minter

She was randomly sIashed at a bus stop and kiIIed by Abdul Jalloh on Monday in Fairfax, Virginia

He had 30+ prior (vioIent) arrests

[Human Flesh Searchulator @fleshsimulator]

His prior arrests include:

Forcible Rape
Attempted Murder (5x)
Malicious Wounding (5x)
Assault and Battery (4x)

The Fairfax DA declined to prosecute every single one of these charges. And now a woman is dead.

@SteveDescano must resign. This is ridiculous.

[Alex Veremeyenko @alex_verem]

Holy shit… Your anonymous internet identity can now be unmasked for $1 😳

Not by the FBI. By anyone with access to Claude or ChatGPT and a few of your Reddit comments.

ETH Zurich and Anthropic just dropped a paper called “Large-Scale Online Deanonymization with LLMs” and the results are the most alarming privacy research I’ve read this year.

They built an automated pipeline that takes your anonymous posts, extracts identity signals, searches the web, and figures out who you are.

No human investigator needed. Fully autonomous. Works on Hacker News, Reddit, LinkedIn, even redacted interview transcripts.
Here’s how bad the numbers are.

On Hacker News users: 67% identified correctly.

When the system made a guess, it was right 90% of the time.

On Reddit academics posting under pseudonyms: 52%.

On scientists whose interview transcripts were explicitly redacted for privacy: 9 out of 33 still got unmasked.

The pipeline works in four steps they call ESRC. Extract identity signals from your posts using LLMs.

Search for candidate matches using embeddings across thousands of profiles.

Reason over top candidates with models like GPT-5.2. Calibrate confidence so when it does guess, it’s almost never wrong.

The classical deanonymization method from the famous Netflix Prize attack? Nearly 0% recall across every test.

LLMs didn’t just improve on old techniques. They made old techniques look like toys.

When they scaled to temporally split Reddit profiles, matching a user’s old posts to their newer ones across a full year gap, the pipeline hit 67% recall at 90% precision and 38% recall at 99% precision.

Meaning even a year of changed interests and different conversations wasn’t enough to hide.

More reasoning compute = better deanonymization. High reasoning effort doubled recall at 99% precision in some tests. As frontier models get smarter, this attack strengthens automatically. Every model upgrade is a privacy downgrade.

What makes it nearly impossible to defend against: the pipeline splits into subtasks that all look benign. Summarize a profile.

Compute embeddings. Rank candidates. No single API call screams “deanonymization.” The researchers themselves say they’re pessimistic that safety guardrails or rate limits can stop it.

Their conclusion is blunt: “Users who post under persistent usernames should assume that adversaries can link their accounts to real identities.” And it extrapolates.

Log-linear projections suggest roughly 35% recall at 90% precision even at one million candidates.

Every throwaway account. Every anonymous forum post. Every “nobody will connect this to me” comment.

It’s all searchable micro-data now. And the cost to run the full agent on one target is less than a cup of coffee.

Practical anonymity on the internet just died. The paper killed it with math.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Wow

[Gerry Callahan @GerryCallahan]

This is perfect.

ICE agent: “If you cared, you would care about the child who got raped and the person who got murdered by the guy we’re looking for. “

Awful, ugly white lady: “I don’t care.”

The entire insane national debate encapsulated in 20 sec.

[The Eagle flies free @Fa21519230]

🚨🚨 Después de años de investigación, el Dr. William Makis comparte el protocolo censurado de dosificación de IVERMECTINA para la lucha contra el cáncer...
Según el Dr. Makis, para la mayoría de los cánceres, incluidos el de mama, colon, pulmón, páncreas, riñón, gástrico y las leucemias, se recomienda una dosis inicial de 1 mg por kg de peso corporal por día...
Para una persona de 60 kg, esto equivale a 60 mg diarios:
- Cinco pastillas de 12 mg
- O 6ml de líquido (aprox. una cucharadita + 1ml)
La evidencia de eficacia es convincente y depende de la dosis:
- El Dr. Shankara Chetty observó cómo el PSA de un paciente con cáncer de próstata disminuía de 89 a 11 con una dosis de 45 mg/día.
- Un caso de la Dra. Tess Lawry mostró una caída del CA125 (marcador de cáncer de ovario) de 288 a 22 con solo 0,2 mg/kg.
- Un estudio a largo plazo de Castro en niños con leucemia no mostró efectos secundarios después de 6 meses con 1 mg/kg.
En el caso de cánceres agresivos (páncreas, cerebro), la barrera hematoencefálica puede requerir una dosis mayor. El Dr. Makis cita:
- Colega del Dr. Landrito con cáncer de vesícula terminal: el cáncer desapareció después de 14 meses con 2 mg/kg/día.
- La dosis más alta documentada es de 2,5 mg/kg (Dr. Chetty), con solo efectos secundarios visuales transitorios que se resolvieron.
La oncología convencional no ofrece esto. ¿Por qué? La ivermectina es genérica, no tiene patente y no es rentable. Por consiguiente, no hay ensayos clínicos financiados...
"Usar ivermectina para el cáncer es, sinceramente, muy sencillo. Es un fármaco sumamente seguro"...
Su recomendación más importante para quienes tienen dificultades es comenzar con 1 mg/kg/día. Se puede tomar durante muchos meses, incluso más de un año, con un excelente perfil de seguridad basado en evidencia anecdótica a largo plazo, nada que perder...

[Bob A. Ganush @UncleBabaganush]

Any US company that fires Americans to hire H1B's or offshore workers should face tariffs or be forced to register as a foreign firm. Period.

[Marc Palasciano @marc_palasciano]

I also exposed T-Mobile’s Indian Takeover while exposing Frisco’s.

I wouldn’t have been able to do this if I accepted my $150k severance package.

I walked away from the career I built from scratch and turned down money to do the right thing and speak up.

[Bob A. Ganush @UncleBabaganush]

"Antifa Kyle" is arrested. #FAFO

[Bob A. Ganush @UncleBabaganush]

This is (was) Jeri Ryan, the "actress" brought onto Star Trek Voyager to jazz up their ratings. She was married to a Republican politician running for one of the US Senate seats in Illinois. She claimed he dragged her to sex clubs. He lost. To Obama. The end.

[Guy Incognito @Incog1986]

All of our nation's problems could have been avoided if this bitch didn't open her mouth.

[Bob A. Ganush @UncleBabaganush]

@cfishman @dangainor Amazon was a *business* with a viable model that required scaling to the point of profitability. Its investors, venture and public, continuously supported it because they believed in it, because it made sense.

What's WaPo's "trajectory?" Toilet?

[Bob A. Ganush @UncleBabaganush]

@cfishman @BourbonWayne Cool. What does Blue Origin make (or aims to eventually make)? Space delivery platforms. What does WaPo make? Liberals believe their imagined worldview is real. They can get *that* drug for free literally anywhere else. There is no monopoly on ragebait or confirmation bias slop.

[Bob A. Ganush @UncleBabaganush]

@cfishman Places to *invest*, not blow on another propaganda operation. Unless, of course, you're talking about Soros or Singham type of billionaire, in which case - let's see *that* pitch deck 🤪

[Michelle Maxwell ™ @MichelleMaxwell]

Glenn Reib nailed it 🎯

Dear Sane America,

What you’re watching is not organic outrage or spontaneous protest, it’s pressure. Deliberate pressure. The fires are being fanned on purpose by political operators, amplified by social media, and sold to the public as compassion. None of it is meant to help Americans. It’s meant to provoke.

This is no longer left vs. right. That framing is dead. What we’re dealing with now is a faction that would rather burn the country down than accept the fact that voters rejected them. They don’t want to govern. They want chaos, because chaos creates leverage.
They want to provoke Trump into invoking the Insurrection Act. Not to protect anyone. Not to restore order. But because escalation is the product. They want confrontation. They want images. They want blood in the streets so they can scream tyranny while standing on the damage they helped cause.

That’s the plan. They don’t have policies because policies require accountability. They don’t have solutions because solutions require competence. What they have is disruption, and an army of "useful idiots" willing to play their role. The foot soldiers don’t understand this. They think screaming in the street is activism. They confuse lawlessness with compassion and chaos with courage. They don’t see that they’re being used as bait, deployed to provoke a response they can then weaponize. So they attack law enforcement. ICE agents enforcing federal law are smeared as villains, called Nazis and Gestapo by little shits who don’t understand history, power, or reality. Courts are ignored. Orders are defied. Federal authority is mocked. And every time disorder follows, they clap like trained seals and call it justice. None of this is accidental. This is bait. They want Trump to act so they can claim victimhood. They want him to move so they can cry dictatorship. They want people hurt so they can point, film, and fundraise. Tragedy isn’t a fear to them, it’s a tool. Bodies become props. Suffering becomes narrative fuel.

And what's making them angrier? Trump sees it. He understands the trap. He knows discipline beats emotion, patience beats mobs, and restraint denies them the spectacle they’re desperate for. Make no mistake about it: this apparatus is willing to see Americans hurt if it advances the narrative. They dress it up as compassion, but it’s sabotage. They talk about justice while excusing crime. They preach empathy while attacking families, mocking work, erasing standards, and treating national identity like a disease. And when sane Americans finally say “enough,” they act shocked...as if consequences fell from the sky. This isn’t disagreement. This is contempt for the country itself.

Sane Americans don’t want revenge. We want order. We want laws that mean something. We want a nation that doesn’t apologize for existing. We are done being manipulated into chaos. Done pretending division is progress. Done letting people who hate this country define morality while pushing it toward the brink. This isn’t about being polite anymore. It’s about being awake. And sane America is awake, clear-eyed, fed up, and no longer willing to hand the wheel to people whose entire strategy is to provoke a national confrontation and blame everyone else for the wreckage.

[Owen Gregorian @OwenGregorian]

Massive Democrat Money Laundering Discovered - Names include Gretchen Whitmer, Jon Ossoff and Cory Booker | Bob Cushman, The Gateway Pundit

Once in a while, a reporter finds a story that challenges his or her ability to tell because it is so massive in terms of time and scope. He or she feels over-whelmed. This reporter feels that way, but let’s begin anyway. This story will attempt to show the reader the journey that this reporter has been on to discover what is most likely one of the largest money laundering evolutions in the history of this country.

First Indications of Massive Money Laundering – 2019

Six years ago in October of 2019, I was downloading data from the FEC database, which by the way is quite easy to do. As I compiled the data I found that three Michigan Congresswomen had received about 75% of their total incoming campaign donations from out of the state of Michigan. At that time, this reporter was both amazed and confused. How could this possibly be? I decided to compile this information and wrote letters to William Barr (Attorney General), Christopher Wray (Director of FBI) and Matthew Schneider (US Attorney of SE Michigan). A copy of this letter which was sent to all three officials is as follows:

In this letter I defined my purpose as:

“The purpose of this letter is to request a thorough investigation into the legitimacy of campaign donations of three Michigan Congressional Districts, MI 8th, MI 11th and MI 13th. The extremely high “out of state” component of the individual donations and other factors strongly suggest a preponderance of “conduits” AKA straw donors which is a violation of Title 52, United States Code, Sections 30122 and 30109(a)(1)(A).”

Unfortunately, I never received a substantive response from anyone.

Amazing Increase in Money Flow to Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer

Fast forward to November of 2023. I once again noticed something astonishing! While analyzing campaign contributions to Governor Whitmer, I was surprised to see the following: “After Whitmer contracted with the largest, most successful Democratic consultants known as GMMB her donation dollars increased by 100 fold and the number of donations per year increased by 265 fold!” How could this possibly happen? Is it possible that the payment to GMMB “facilitated” the increased flow of “Straw Donors” AKA “Smurfs”? Only an investigation that could produce subpoenas could find the truth! The details of my findings can be found here:

Election Watch Press Release

I then came across a Press release from Election Watch/ Peter Bernegger that stated: “A report by non-profit organizations, the Gibson Group of Maryland and Election Watch, has exposed a large-scale money laundering scheme in US political campaigns. This involves the use of “smurfs” – thousands of individuals who make numerous small donations to liberal PACs, committees or directly to candidates’ campaigns, in order to launder large sums of money. The report claims that over $200m has been laundered so far, with many of the smurfs being unaware their names and addresses are being used for donations. Investigation found that the smurfs tend to be primarily white, retired, liberal, and of middle to lower economic class.”

Note: Peter Bernegger is, in my opinion the absolute authority on identifying “straw donors” AAK “smurfs”. I encourage readers to visit the following website: You will be amazed at the data that has been composed for your benefit! Peter is without question one of the leading Patriots in this country fighting for election integrity!

Letter to James Comer:

Fast forward to September of 2024. This author composed a letter to James Comer – Chair of the Congressional Oversight Committee. In this letter I stated the letter’s purpose as follows: “As a citizen journalist/investigative reporter, I have spent several hundred hours, in the past few years, researching and reporting on the subject matter of your investigation. I am responding to your announcement with some of my work in hopes that it may prove helpful to your investigation. The most important aspect of laundered money in the campaign finance sector is that our right to be represented by our elected officials has been stolen in large part by massive amounts of laundered money! This cannot be overstated! I believe there have been billions of dollars illegally laundered by ActBlue in the last two decades, and more recently and to a much lesser degree, by WinRed! I think it highly likely that the FEC is complicit or at the very least, guilty of malfeasance in this regard.”

To view the letter to James Comer see the following:

In my data research I discovered 20 smurfs that I labeled as the Corey Booker Smurfs. A summary of these smurfs is as follows:

All of these so called donors are seniors with the average being 80 years old. Amazingly these 20 persons have been accused of donating over 2.6 million dollars in over 187,000 separate donations. It should be noted that conventional wisdom indicates that these elderly persons had their identities stolen and that they did not actually make anywhere close to this ridiculous amount of donations/money. Investigations by many, including James O Keefe, Peter Bernegger and myself have shown that most, if not all, of individuals similarly involved are actually “straw donors” AKA “smurfs”.

Trump Orders DOJ to Investigate ActBlue!

Fast forward to April of 2025 In April 2025, President Donald Trump ordered the Justice Department (DOJ) to investigate foreign money flowing through campaign funds, specifically targeting ActBlue, the Democrats’ main fundraising platform, citing “straw donor” schemes and illegal foreign contributions.

Seditious Six – Recipients of Money Laundering

Fast forward to December – 2025.

After conducting many hours of “spreadsheet analysis” this author issued a report in which I state: “It now appears that the six lawmakers have been found to have been heavily involved in money laundering. Investigative Reporter/Citizen Journalist, Bob Cushman, has just released an FEC data analysis that strongly suggests that Mark Kelly, Elissa Slotkin, Jason Crow, Chris Deluzio, Chrissy Houlahan and Maggie Goodlander have been recipients of illegally laundered campaign funds. In the initial investigation, Cushman cites 22 Smurf examples that have “allegedly” contributed almost three million dollars in more than 95,000 separate donations to Democratic coffers. All six members of the Seditious Six have received funds from one or more of these “smurfs”.”

This report can be viewed at:

The data contained in this report is summarized in this following chart:

In this analysis, I labeled the 22 smurfs the Mark Kelly Smurfs since he was the only one in this study that received donations from all 22 smurfs. Once again the average age of these smurfs is senior level 77 years of age. Does anyone really believe that these 22 seniors contributed almost three million dollars in 95,000 separate donations? It is inconceivable to me that the FEC was not aware of this treachery! Perhaps one day we will see what person or persons at the FEC are indicted for these crimes!

Shocking Revelation by Jason Roe – Campaign Strategist

In a very informative news discussion between Pulitzer Prize Winning Journalist Charlie LeDuff in a “No BS Newshour Episode #395” and campaign strategist Jason Roe (Fraudette Smurf – YouTube) it was stated that ActBlue has allegedly received over 16 billion dollars since 2004. It was also revealed that several senior members of ActBlue have abruptly resigned since allegations of fraud have come forward and several federal investigations have begun in 2025.

Jason Roe stated that people working within political campaigns for many years have been aware of the money laundering that was enabled by ActBlue and that Charlie LeDuff had, within the first few minutes of Episode 395, done a far better job of explaining how ActBlue had laundered money than any mainstream media ever had!

Jason Roe further states that:

- This activity is fraud

- This activity is money laundering

- This activity is funneling money from outside the US

- That Republicans are now outraising Democrats for the first time in a decade

Jason Roe explains that easy to obtain “soft money” is converted into hard to obtain “hard money”, in part, because candidates can use their campaign “hard money” to make television advertising buys at 40% of the rate that soft money manipulators can. If you are a campaign, you would give your bottom dollar to be holding hard dollars when it comes to “winning”. According to Jason Roe’s own testimony, persons like himself that actually run campaigns, have been aware of the illegal conversion of “soft money” to “hard money” through the use of straw donors, also known as “smurfs” for many years!

U.S. Senators are Guilty of Using (or Conducting) Massive Money Laundering! The following chart may be downloaded at the following link:

As I was comparing the two groups of smurfs that I previously uncovered, I decided to see what other Senators that may be involved in this Massive Money Laundering scenario. Please note that this Summary is but my initial effort and is expected to be expanded as time allows. I believe the average viewer will be a surprised as I was at the magnitude of this revelation.

Discussion Regarding Eight Senators’ “Contributions” from 42 Smurfs

- Does anyone really believe that Michael Berger of Pennsylvania really donated $1,324,205 in 24,680 separate donations?

- Does anyone really believe that Susan Law of Fishers, Indiana donated a total of $1045.83 in 73 separate donations that average $14.33 each?

- Does anyone believe that Susan Law would actually donate to these entities and about 75 others? ABBY FOR IOWA, ALSOBROOKS FOR SENATE, BENNET FOR COLORADO, BLUEWAVEAMERICA LLC, BOB CASEY FOR SENATE INC, BOLLIER FOR KANSAS, CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO FOR SENATE, CHC BOLD PAC, CHERI BEASLEY FOR NORTH CAROLINA, CHRISSY HOULAHAN FOR CONGRESS, CORY BOOKER FOR SENATE, DAGA PAC, DCCC, DEBBIE FOR FLORIDA, DEMOCRATIC ACTION, DNC SERVICES CORP / DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE, DSCC, ELLIOTT FOR WEST VIRGINIA, EQUALITY PAC, FETTERMAN FOR PA, FRIENDS OF KATRINA CHRISTIANSEN, FRIENDS OF SHERROD BROWN, GALLEGO FOR ARIZONA, GILLIBRAND FOR SENATE, HALEY STEVENS FOR CONGRESS, JAIME HARRISON FOR US SENATE, JON OSSOFF FOR SENATE, KLOBUCHAR FOR MINNESOTA, MARCUS FOR GEORGIA, MRVAN FOR CONGRESS, OCCUPY DEMOCRATS ELECTION FUND, PETERS FOR MICHIGAN, SARA GIDEON FOR MAINE, SCHIFF FOR SENATE?

- Does anyone believe that Wendy Zorn of NJ would really donate over $8,000.00 in 1,335 separate donations that only average $6.36 each?

- Does anyone believe that Wendy Zorn made over 390 donations that were less than $2.00 each?

- Does anyone really believe that Dave Hutton of California actually made 14,000 separate donations that total over one third of a million dollars? Of course not!

We could go on ad nauseum but any cognitive able person will see that these small donations were originally designed to “stay under the radar” of financial sleuths such as myself. Truth be told it worked for almost two decades! Alas, no more!!!!!

Epilogue

It now can be seen that Senators Cory Booker, Mark Kelly, Elissa Slotkin, Raphael Warnock, Adam Schiff, Jon Ossoff, Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobuchar are heavily and possibly criminally involved as recipients of what is obviously a massive money laundering effort that probably spans the past two decades! This grouping of 42 seniors, AKA “smurfs” reveals the dedicated efforts of some very determined, corrupt individuals to launder money into the Democratic sphere of campaign finance. These 42 persons are “alleged” to have donated over 7.4 million dollars in over 32,000 separate donations. The ActBlue scheme of “Too Small, Too Many To Find” has been discovered! This current revelation is just a current snapshot of what will be an ongoing and probably ever growing investigatory effort.

Stay Tuned Fellow Patriots and please share this as you are able! The Best (Or Worse) is Yet to Come!

Bob Cushman – Investigative Reporter The Freedom Press https://t.co/a72MEjoNVa

...

Notes:

- Evidence is available at https://t.co/sCocbkOxIa as well as: and

- 30 donations occurred after Linda Luna’s Death on May 5, 2024!

- 785 Donations were made after Joan Wofford’s death on January 30, 2023!

Read more:

https://t.co/WaiE5k5jUR

[Bob A. Ganush @UncleBabaganush]

@UnHerdNerd @PNWConservative @future42org Socialism/communism delivers common misery, not common prosperity. Not a bug.

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

🚨 Large scale voter fraud taking place in Michigan

- 36% of new voter registrations last year have invalid Social Security numbers but were allowed to complete voter registration anyway
- Michigan has 500,000 more voters registered than we have voting age adults

“A state senator, Johnson has sounded the alarm about election insecurity in Michigan. Johnson points to the Help America Vote Verification System

Last year, 100,000 people registered to vote in Michigan. 36% of them, 36,000 had invalid four-digit Social Security numbers and they were allowed to register anyway

Michigan has 500,000 more voters registered than we have voting age adults. How many of those are non-citizens?“

“We know that Jocelyn Benson, our Secretary of State, has shared Michigan voter data with nonprofits — Every Democrat operative in America has access to our voter data if they want it”

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

America should not have worse voter ID requirements than every democratic country on Earth.

California and New York actually banned use of ID to vote! It is illegal to show your ID in those states.

The only reason to do this is fraud.