GS🇦🇱

Salafi|Kelmend🇦🇱🩸|Unapologetically Muslim☝🏽

[GS🇦🇱 @Unknownp0lymath]

@muslimorthodoxy God logic Typologically fulfilling Hosea 1:2: “ "Go, take for yourself a wife of prostitution”

[GS🇦🇱 @Unknownp0lymath]

@wavesology @Hanbali2024 He was sported with by 500 Roman’s. It’s evident. And it’s a proper textual reading

[GS🇦🇱 @Unknownp0lymath]

@Jahilterminator @wavesology @Hanbali2024 This needs to go viral I swear. Never would we hear Al-Zutt again😹

[GS🇦🇱 @Unknownp0lymath]

@wavesology @Hanbali2024 do it and embarrass yourself. Because you don’t know the argument, Nor do you understand the evidence presented. This same verse is cited by David tombs as well and he says Saul feared sexual abuse😹😹😹😹

[GS🇦🇱 @Unknownp0lymath]

@wavesology @Hanbali2024 He supports the position and says the Sexual assault from the context is unavoidable. You’re not refuting our position. This is the best explanation we have to what happened. 😹

[GS🇦🇱 @Unknownp0lymath]

@wavesology @Hanbali2024 Tracking issues🥀😹. Read and stop wasting our time

[GS🇦🇱 @Unknownp0lymath]

@wavesology @Hanbali2024 Lord have mercy. You cannot track nor are you reading what we are sending. This Verse is recognized That He feared to be sexually assaulted by oncoming army. Hence why he asked to be killed. “Lest they come and make sport of me” (rape me). Same word is used😹

[GS🇦🇱 @Unknownp0lymath]

@wavesology @Hanbali2024 David tombs saying it’s speculative isn’t refuting our argument that it is the most likely outcome. Let me ask you, According to the sources we’ve, Provided When Roman’s dressed a male in bright violet this is a prelude to being penetrated. was Jesus dressed In bright violet?

[GS🇦🇱 @Unknownp0lymath]

@wavesology @Hanbali2024 As we see in 1 Samuel 31:4 The same word is used, but the sexual Nature of the text Is hidden by the same euphemism. Even though This is recognized as sexual. Despite it not being explicit from the text😹😹🥀🥀. So yes the case can absolutely be made for Matthew 27. You lose

[GS🇦🇱 @Unknownp0lymath]

@wavesology @Hanbali2024 The criterion of embarrassment being The crucifixion is one thing that stands out. However we see Sexual cases being diminished like that of the Levite’s concubine. It’s more silent not explicit. This is more so the case with Male figures. Like in 1st Samuel 31:4:

[GS🇦🇱 @Unknownp0lymath]

@wavesology @Hanbali2024 Historical and gospel context shows it occurred in a Private setting, not public mocking. 2. The fact the euphemism is used And combined with the historical context of the practice of Dressing a male prisoner in violet, Is the prelude to being penetrated. So We can make this case

[GS🇦🇱 @Unknownp0lymath]

@wavesology @Hanbali2024 In this context it’ll come under Sporting (sexual maltreatment). As Muroaka strangely places this example (judges 19) under sense 1, 'sport jestfully', adding a note 'of sexual maltreatment*. This is our argument. Your god got sported with by 500 Roman’s 😹

[GS🇦🇱 @Unknownp0lymath]

@Jay_49erTikTok @Jahilterminator @adam17129 @Hanbali2024 Actions having prescribed purification≠permissible.
You’re an absolute Bot, with a subhuman IQ. I challenge you to show where this is permissible by the scholars so I can bury you Like j did your god😹

[GS🇦🇱 @Unknownp0lymath]

@wavesology @Hanbali2024 Also the ‘verb’ you mentioned, which translates to (they knew), doesn’t exclude omissions of it to be sexual. See Judges 20:5

[GS🇦🇱 @Unknownp0lymath]

@Hanbali2024 @Jay_49erTikTok I love this😹. We gotta make this arg viral. Happy you’re using it akhi!

[Andalus @Hanbali2024]

Below will be a thread @Jay_49erTikTok will be responsible for because he wants to lie on the prophet.

Historians speak of his God that he worships as being ‘raped’ on the cross 👇

[Andalus @Hanbali2024]

Now since you didn’t respond last time, I’ll bury you YET again.

Everyone let’s all laugh at Bread.

the conclusion doesn’t even follow from the premises.

I expect a full response clown. Don’t block me like the rest of your friends. You’re looking really bad right now. You’re actually missing a premise and I’ll let you figure out which one is missing because this is embarrassing. Validity has to do with the structure/ form of the argument and clearly this is something that is lacking here. Go do your homework, ask the Christian man why he gave you an invalid argument to embarrass yourself, and re post the valid one.

Don’t respond and act like this is a cope I’ll humiliate you further. Tell us how the conclusion follows the premises given the form.

[The Orthodox Muslim @muslimorthodoxy]

The biggest scam in history is believing that the death of a crucified Jewish Rabbi on a stick 2000 years ago proves he’s God.