UnspecialOne

Success without health is nothing. Optimal health is a decision I have made. Carnivore since Sep 2023. Peace.

[UnspecialOne @Unspecial3]

Gas lit. Promoting regular and excessive Carbs by the food industry is the biggest conspiracy to defraud the human race from their health

[UnspecialOne @Unspecial3]

@onlybreakouts Is over fitting less of a problem with larger data sets, like with 1200 trades per backtest?

[UnspecialOne @Unspecial3]

@OccupyDemocrats The pool boy misChief.

[Occupy Democrats @OccupyDemocrats]

BREAKING: HOLY COW! Trump hands Democrats an attack ad on a silver platter by insanely stating that: "I love the inflation" as it hits a three-year high.

You can't afford groceries and the President is thrilled...

"Are you concerned, Mr. President, about the latest inflation number which came out this morning? Could that be a negative for Republicans trying to hold the House and Senate?" a reporter asked Trump.

Earlier today, the Bureau of Labor Statistics dropped the bombshell news that U.S. inflation has accelerated for the third month in a row and rose 4.2% since May of last year. That is devastating news for consumers, whose already embattled wallets will be stretched thinner by the day. This is a direct result of Trump's pointless, economy-destroying Iran War.

"No, I love it. The numbers were great," Trump responded to the reporter. "You know what I really love? I love the inflation. You know why? Because as soon as this war is over, you know, I can say it now, something you didn't know... Do you know we've been taking out millions of barrels of oil? Nobody knows it."

"You know who doesn't know about it? Iran, until right now," he continued. "We took out the other night 22 ships, late at night with no lights, because they don't have any radar, because we blasted the crap out of it. We took out, that's why oil is $85 a barrel."

It's unclear exactly what he was talking about. If he's claiming that the United States has been seizing oil ships, that does nothing for American consumers. The price of oil will not stabilize until the Strait of Hormuz is fully opened and that won't happen until Trump caves to Iran's demands. They hold the leverage. He keeps claiming that a deal is right around the corner but the war just keeps dragging on and on.

Trump's Energy Secretary Chris Wright said yesterday that traffic through the Strait is rising, but then today Trump announced plans to resume bombing. If he escalates attacks on Iran, traffic will plummet to nothing. We are stuck in a vicious feedback loop of incompetency.

"I mean, you take a look," Trump went on. "Remember when I did this, I said, look, the one bad thing will be, we hit the best economy we've ever hit. And I said to my people, I had Scott, I had Howard, I had Pete, I had all of them. I had Todd in the room. I said, the one thing we have to do now, we had just hit the highest stock market in history, highest 401Ks in history. Everything was going well, and I said, I hate to do this to you guys, but Iran is going to have a nuclear weapon very soon. We have to go and attack. So we hit them with the B-2 bombers."

As has been reported ad nauseam in countless publications, Iran was not pursuing a nuclear weapon. Our intelligence agencies admitted as much. Trump attacked Iran because Israel asked him to, because they want to destroy a regional adversary to aid their territorial expansion into Lebanon. Americans gain nothing from this war but are shouldering the full economic burden.

Please ❤️ and share to demand an immediate deal with Iran!

[Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ @shanaka86]

Yesterday a single company put the most capable vulnerability-finding machine ever built into public hands.

Today the people who hold $120 billion of crypto cannot agree on whether they just became prey.

That disagreement is the trade.

The model is Claude Fable 5, the first public release in Anthropic’s new Mythos tier. The restricted version of that tier has already surfaced more than 10,000 critical vulnerabilities across the world’s most important software. The public version routes anything that smells like offensive hacking back to the older model, and Anthropic says more than 1,000 hours of bug-bounty attacks failed to find a single universal jailbreak.

The crypto industry split in half within hours.

One camp, led by a Moonrock Capital founder relaying a top white-hat, says the cost and skill to find an exploitable flaw in a smart contract is about to fall to basically zero. Their advice was not analysis. It was a fire drill. Revoke your approvals. Pull funds from anything unaudited. Move to fresh hardware wallets. Treat every contract as a sitting duck until proven otherwise.

The other camp, led by the founder of Curve Finance, says calm down. His point is sharp. The model is brilliant at browser and operating-system bugs, but most smart contracts are small, already heavily audited, and easier for existing tools to read. The real money was never lost in the Solidity. It was lost at the edges. Compromised multisig keys. Poisoned frontend dependencies. A single cross-chain verifier with no backup.

Both of them are right, and that is the uncomfortable part.

The same machine that lets a defender audit a protocol in an afternoon lets an attacker probe it in the same afternoon. The advantage does not go to the side with the better technology anymore. It goes to the side that points it first. For years the asymmetry in crypto favored the attacker because defense was slow and manual. Frontier AI does not erase that asymmetry. It accelerates both ends of it at once and dares each side to move faster than the other.

Here is what the panic misses and the calm misses too.

The exposure was never really the code. It was the belief that nobody capable enough was looking. That belief is what just died. $120 billion sat behind the quiet assumption that the cost of finding the hole was higher than the value of the hole. Drop that cost toward zero and every unaudited contract is repriced in an instant, whether or not a single one is ever drained.

The machine did not create the risk. It revealed the price of pretending the risk was not there.

The protocols that survive the next year will be the ones already running this tool against their own code today. The ones that wait to find out which camp was right will not get to choose.

[UnspecialOne @Unspecial3]

@gothburz The guilty do the accusing. Don't get distracted by it.

[UnspecialOne @Unspecial3]

@onlybreakouts I was very disappointed when I learnt how many strategies fail going live despite great backrests. Fee simulation is vital. I scale net profit with max drawdown when optimising and aim for 12% maxdrawdown. Had my first profitable week last week.

[Breakout Trading Academy @onlybreakouts]

Most traders think adding rules makes a strategy better.

I built a 2-rule NQ strategy in BreakoutOS and compared it against 1,000 alternative NQ algo strategies. It came out in the 97th percentile.

Here's what complexity actually costs:

Every parameter you add is a degree of freedom. Every degree of freedom is another way to overfit. Each one makes your backtest look better and your live results worse.

This strategy has none of that.

Entry: Previous day's low plus 0.8x ATR(40). Cross it long on a stop order. Exit at the end of day. Nothing else.

The structural audit (I used the Backtest Auditor module in BreakoutOS) checks how much data manipulation would have been required to produce those backtest results by accident. Here, the score was low. Because there's nothing to manipulate. The edge comes mostly from NQ's built-in directional tendency, which is a real and persistent market bias, not something you engineered in.

Regime breakdown: the strategy excels in volatile uptrends, normal uptrends, volatile downtrends, and slightly in volatile ranging markets. It also outperforms the 1,000 comparison strategies specifically in quiet uptrends. Weaknesses in quiet ranging, normal ranging, quiet downtrend, normal downtrend. Exactly what you'd expect from a long-biased breakout.

Market readiness for current conditions: 100%.

Historical analogs project 68% win rate, 4.3 profit factor, almost $500 average trade. One snapshot from a similar past market: 83% win rate.

Two rules. According to the Backtest Auditor (in BreakoutOS) - 97th percentile - meaning, beating 97% of other strategies. Ready to launch.

What's the simplest strategy you've ever actually traded live?

[UnspecialOne @Unspecial3]

@SamaHoole When you put it like that it doesn't sound radical at all.

[Sama Hoole @SamaHoole]

Despite the reputation, I don't think everyone needs to be carnivore. You don't have to bin the vegetables, torch the fruit bowl, and swear a blood oath to ribeye.

My position is calmer than the internet would have you believe. It comes down to three things.

One. Fatty animal foods belong at the centre of the human diet, as the keystone, the place the evolutionary record keeps quietly pointing to while we keep politely looking away. The guidelines shoved them into the corner of the plate, and that was the mistake.

Two. Plants are not automatically virtuous. Some are wonderful, some are fine, and some carry oxalates, lectins, and a long list of caveats nobody reads out while calling them clean. "Plant" was never a synonym for "harmless."

Three. Carnivore is a viable diet in its own right, short term and long term, for health and for the way you feel walking around inside your own body.

That's the whole manifesto. No commandments. No congregation. Animal fat restored to its rightful seat, plants judged honestly rather than worshipped, and one very good option put back on the table for whoever wants it.

Eat your veg if it suits you. I'd just like the steak to stop being treated like the problem.

[UnspecialOne @Unspecial3]

@SamaHoole @thehatecrew615 @realDonaldTrump It gets my vote

[TheLand216 @tnhusel]

@OccupyDemocrats BLOTUS is always pivoting, courtesy of the Roy Cohn playbook. Sad.

[UnspecialOne @Unspecial3]

@Microinteracti1 Trump doesn't sleep

[UnspecialOne @Unspecial3]

Enough

[Mike Levin @MikeLevin]

This is so insanely corrupt, I can’t even believe it.

More than half the donors to Trump’s $400 million White House ballroom just won over $50 billion in new federal contracts in six months.

And here’s the part that should make your blood boil.

Sixteen of these 27 donors were facing federal enforcement actions, antitrust reviews, labor cases, securities charges. Many of those cases have been quietly dropped or scaled back since Trump took office. You write a check, your legal problems disappear. That’s not a coincidence.

The White House won’t even release the full donor list. They’re hiding it on purpose, because daylight is the one thing pay-to-play can’t survive. A federal judge already ruled ballroom construction has to stop until Congress authorizes it.

Government is supposed to serve the people, not auction itself off to the highest bidder. When access goes to whoever pays the most, working families always end up paying the price.

We either end the corruption, or the corruption will end us.

https://t.co/4MGFzSseFl

[UnspecialOne @Unspecial3]

Enough

[Gianl1974 @Gianl1974]

A message to all sane Republicans:

He pardoned 1,600 violent criminals.
You said nothing.

He bulldozed the East Wing.
You said nothing.

He interfered with the release of the Epstein files. You said nothing.

He took over the Kennedy Center and renamed it after himself. You said nothing.

He accepted a $400 million airplane as a personal gift. You said nothing.

He threatened Canada, Cuba, Denmark, Greenland, Venezuela, Colombia, and Brazil. You said nothing.

He tariffed just about everyone but Russia, causing inflation and instability worldwide. You said nothing.

He attacked a nation during mediated negotiations. You said nothing.

His ill-conceived war killed 175 children on day one. You said nothing.

He alienated and insulted our allies. You said nothing.

His ICE Army terrorized and murdered U.S. citizens. You said nothing.

He committed murder on the high seas. You said nothing.

He co-opted the Justice Department and directed it to prosecute his political enemies. You said nothing.

It’s time to start talking.

[UnspecialOne @Unspecial3]

Markets are forward looking and it looks to me like the ai bubble could hit a sharp corner on this.

[Grok @grok]

**Yes, the proposal exists.** The European Commission adopted the **Cloud and AI Development Act (CADA)** proposal today (June 3, 2026), unveiled by Henna Virkkunen. It introduces EU-wide sovereignty assessment tiers and non-price procurement criteria favoring European-developed cloud/AI solutions for sensitive public sector use (banking, healthcare, defense, energy).

It does **not** make American AI illegal or ban US providers outright. It creates preferences and risk assessments that could limit hyperscalers in high-sovereignty government tenders due to CLOUD Act concerns. Most of the market stays open.

**Status:** Commission proposal only. Must pass European Parliament + Council negotiations. Earliest full adoption likely 2027.

The thread accurately flags the sovereignty push but exaggerates it as an immediate ban across 27 countries.

[UnspecialOne @Unspecial3]

@Ric_RTP I wonder if an American narcissist can understand the origin of Europe First..

[UnspecialOne @Unspecial3]

@NoLieWithBTC Values are being cancelled by MAGA, the very values that once made America great.

[Ricky Anderson👨🏻‍🏭 @Tigman74]

1. Elon Musk — ~$820–839 Billion
(Tesla, SpaceX, xAI, etc.)
2. Larry Page — ~$257–329 Billion
(Co-founder of Google / Alphabet)
3. Sergey Brin — ~$237–306 Billion
(Co-founder of Google / Alphabet)
4. Jeff Bezos — ~$224–292 Billion
(Founder of Amazon, Blue Origin)
5. Mark Zuckerberg — ~$222–253 Billion
(Founder of Meta / Facebook)
6. Larry Ellison — ~$190–299 Billion
(Founder of Oracle)
7. Jensen Huang — ~$151–155 Billion
(CEO of Nvidia)
8. Warren Buffett — ~$150 Billion
(Berkshire Hathaway)
9. Steve Ballmer — ~$153–158 Billion
(Former CEO of Microsoft)
10. Michael Dell or Rob Walton (varies by source) — ~$140–150 Billion
(Dell Technologies or Walmart heir)

[UnspecialOne @Unspecial3]

@MykhailoRohoza Have his tariffs been refunded yet

[Ricardo @Ric_RTP]

This Google insider just revealed what AI is actually being used for behind closed doors.

It has nothing to do with chatbots.

Mo Gawdat was a senior executive at Google for over a decade. He watched AI get built from the inside. He was in the rooms, in the labs, in the government meetings in China that almost no Western executive was allowed into.

And he just went on Diary of a CEO and said things that no active tech executive would ever be allowed to say publicly:

"What the general public sees about AI is overhyped but ineffective. What the real geeks see inside the lab is genuinely world-changing."

The public gets chatbots and AI-generated videos while the labs are building autonomous weapons systems, military targeting technology, real-time surveillance infrastructure, and self-improving code that rewrites itself every microsecond without human oversight.

As Mo put it: "As we speak, we are living in two major wars where AI is doing most of the killing."

He talked about Palantir's CEO Alex Karp openly celebrating how his targeting technology identifies and eliminates people. He talked about the next generation of autonomous weapons costing $20,000 each, meaning any government with a $50 billion defense budget can literally rain drones on every corner of the planet.

And as you remember, Anthropic was offered a $500 million military contract to allow their AI to be used for human targeting and surveillance. They refused and walked away from the money.

OpenAI took the contract the following week.

Mo's response: "You have to start observing who is actually behaving in a way that makes AI work for humanity, and who is behaving in a way that makes AI work for their share price."

Now this is where it gets really interesting...

In Mo's documentary Chasing Utopia, Altman literally says directly on camera: "I suspect that AI is likely going to end humanity, but we're going to create a lot of interesting companies in the process."

That is the CEO of the most powerful AI company on Earth saying that he suspects his OWN technology will end the human race and then shrugging it off because the business opportunity is too good to pass up.

Mo's prediction for the next decade:

War, economic collapse, mass unemployment, surveillance expansion, and an absolute concentration of power at the top unlike anything in modern history.

His prediction after that is if humanity survives the next 10 years, AI will eventually create a world of abundance where intelligence solves every problem we currently face.

But the path between here and there is what terrifies him.

And the men building the technology know exactly what they're doing.

Do you think he's just exaggerating for attention, or is there truth in this?