Many Muslims don’t know this:
The Qur’an says:
“Say, [O Muhammad], ‘If the Most Merciful had a son, then I would be the first of the worshippers.’” (Qur’an 43:81)
Notice what the verse says. The argument is not that it is impossible for God to have a Son. Rather, it says that if the Most Merciful did have a Son, Muhammad would be the first to worship Him.
Christians claim that Jesus is the Son of God. According to the logic of this verse, if that claim is true, then Muhammad himself would be the first to worship Him.
So here’s the question: if Jesus really is the Son of God, shouldn’t Muslims follow what this verse says and worship Him?
As a former Muslim, and unlike you, I was at least honest when dealing with Christian doctrines, I can tell you this:
What you just said is a stupid explanation.
Christianity does not teach that God ceased to exist or that God’s divine essence died. The Son assumed a human nature, and in that human nature He died on the cross. That is not the same as saying God died.
So either you are ignorant of basic Christian theology, or you’re deliberately attacking a position Christians don’t hold.
That’s called a straw man fallacy.
This is a pathetic excuse.
“Kafir” in Islam is an insult. Stop playing linguistic games. Nobody cares what the word meant in a dictionary. What matters is how it’s used and what it represents.
A kafir is assigned an inferior status under sharia law: a Muslim cannot be killed for killing a kafir, a kafir is considered impure, cannot marry a Muslim woman, and is not accepted as a witness against a Muslim.
So spare us the dishonest “it just means non-believer” defense. That’s like using the N-word and then claiming it’s harmless because, linguistically, it originally referred to the color black.
Words are defined by how they’re used, not by the etymology you suddenly discover when you’re trying to escape criticism.
Sneaky Sneako,
You produce nothing. You build nothing.
You post on platforms built by the kuffar. You use devices designed and manufactured by the kuffar. You communicate in a language developed by the kuffar. You live in a country established by the kuffar.
Yet you claim superiority, not because of your achievements, productivity, or contribution to society, but because of your contempt for the very people whose innovations, institutions, and freedoms you rely on every single day.
That’s not superiority. It’s dependence wrapped in arrogance and hatred.
On Tuesday, July 21, 2026, in Sebha, Libya, a Muslim woman was publicly sentenced to 100 lashes for adultery because she was unmarried. The sentence was carried out the very same day.
This is Sharia law in action. If she had been married, the prescribed punishment would have been stoning to death.
So the next time someone tells you Sharia is “misunderstood” or “just a personal moral code,” remember this woman being whipped in public.
This is the system some insist is compatible with Western values. It isn’t.
Please read and share this important article on Islam and Islamism. I truly believe it will be worth your time, and you won’t regret reading it. If you find it valuable, please help others by sharing it as well.
Muhammad was consistently associated with bloodshed and violence.
He said, “I came with slaughter,” and he also said, “My provision has been placed under the shade of my spear.”
In less than ten years, he led or ordered more than 80 military campaigns. His armies killed opponents, took captives, enslaved women and children, distributed or sold captives, used some for sex, expelled Jewish tribes from Medina, and instructed his followers to follow his example.
So stop trying to put makeup on history and portray Muhammad as a symbol of peace.
Public flogging is not an invention of extremists. It is explicitly mentioned in the Quran, was practiced during Muhammad’s lifetime, continued by his companions, and remained part of Islamic legal tradition for 1400 years.
Many Muslim-majority countries stopped carrying out such punishments only after been pressured by modern human rights norms and western countries. Others, such as Libya and Afghanistan, continue to enforce them.
So spare us the claim that public flogging has “nothing to do with Islam.” You may argue that it should no longer be practiced, but denying its roots in Islamic scripture and classical jurisprudence is historical revisionism.
Thank you, Elon Musk. @elonmusk You saved freedom of speech. X is the only major platform left where people can openly criticize Islam without being silenced by censorship.
كرم حلوم استضاف الأخ رشيد، ثمّ نشر من الحلقة مقاطع بعنوان "يُحرج الأخ رشيد". فلمّا نشر رشيد ردّه الكامل، لم يردّ عليه؛ بلّغ عنه ليوتيوب كي يُحذف.
هذا هو الاختبار الذي لا يُغَشّ فيه أحد. الجريء يحتمل الردّ؛ والمنتفخ يحتمل التصفيق وحده. جرأة كرم لم تكن جرأةً يوماً؛ كانت سيطرةً على المونتاج، وقد سقطت في اللحظة التي خرج فيها الكلام من غرفته.
ونموذج كرم متكرّر في الإعلام العربي والإسلامي: ثقافةٌ منتفخة، وعناوينُ تكسر المحظور، وتحتها لا شيء يحتمل النقاش. تتقن الثقافة العربية والإسلامية صناعة الرجل الذي يبدو عميقاً حتى يُسأل سؤالاً واحداً.
ومن يطلب حذف الردّ عليه، يعترف أنّه لا يملك رداً.
كرم حلوم والغرفة الخادعة: رد شامل وكامل من الاخ رشيد.
ملاحظة: لم يتحمل هذا الجاهل المخادع رد رشيد فقام بالتبليغ عن الحلقة على اليوتوب على انه اقتبس من حلقته كحقوق ملكية فتم حذف الحلقة حتى يبت اليوتيوب هل هى استخدام عادل ام حقوق ملكية ؟.
عموما انصح الجميع بتنزيل الحلقة وانشروها على مواقعكم فى كل مكان لتعميم النقاش والفائدة.
شكرا
Last week, I participated in an interview with a Lebanese Muslim host who was openly hostile toward me and repeatedly refused to let me respond to his claims.
Today, at the request of my audience, I published a response. I used short segments from the very interview in which I personally participated, clearly under fair use, to address and rebut the claims that were made against me. The episode is an hour and a half long, and the vast majority of it consists of my own commentary and analysis.
Instead of responding to my arguments, the host filed a false copyright claim. Without investigating the context, YouTube immediately removed my episode and issued me a copyright strike.
I’m asking for your help in bringing this to the attention of the YouTube team. In the past, YouTube has usually been very responsive in correcting situations like this, but I don’t know what’s happening this time.
The episode is still available here on X, where anyone can see that it is professionally produced and clearly constitutes fair use. @YouTubeCreators@YouTube