@CincyOHIO1 “NOOOOOOO I DONT WANNA HELP OTHER PEOPLE I WANT TO CAUSE AS MUCH HUMAN SUFFERING AS POSSIBLE TO INDULGE MY OWN GREED WAAAAAAAAHHHHHHH!!!!!!!”
I requireth one know the word “wokenessism” to know they art a true patriout and serfe our great countrie
I requireth this for to “own the libbs”.
No sirkum-nolege shall be provided.
@Postbop3C I’m not at my house but here’s an old book I found at an antique store.
it dates to the early 1920s and recommends radium therapy
(Interpretation of the World’s Medical Sciences Number Four)
@emethias@catlovingcommie @MOisawannabeKS I’m not looking for why cons may arrive at their conclusion. I’m interested in if they are correct.
No source means no evidence which means it can be dismissed without evidence.
(And places with higher population also would obviously have more crime bc more people)
@emethias@catlovingcommie @MOisawannabeKS Statistics aren’t based on assumptions. They’re based on data collected through polls and other means.
Inferring anything from that set of data could potentially lead to a false conclusion. It’s scientifically unethical to produce stats to support your argument out of thin air.
@The8BitIdiot I think it’s mostly because we consider that there are people EVEN LESS FORTUNATE THAN SOMEONE WHO CANNOT AFFORD FOOD. Like, think about that for a second.
We live in a plutocracy.
@emethias@catlovingcommie @MOisawannabeKS This has nothing in it relating to political standings and their relevance to shootings. What was that supposed to teach me again?