Val

[Charlie Alexander @Chuckles152]

What’s up concerned citizens of Delaware county?

The #DelawareCounty GOP, Michael Straw and two of their patsies have taken it on themselves since most Delconians refused to sign their petition to pack the #Delco Council with two patsies.

Go to the @DELCOGOPpa, The Media Republicans Page, @MDStrawPSU page and tell them to stop wasting our tax dollars for something we don’t want and to get out of our way while we do their job to put 3 Good, Honest Republicans on that council in 2027 and win back delco for the people by the people.

We chose not to support your petition. Shove it up your asssss.

[ℕ𝕚𝕔 @NicholeNixon16]

@janninereid1 👇🏾

[Felonious Monk @_Felonious_Monk]

@janninereid1

[JL @JaqLC1313]

@Chuckles152 This guy is renting out his house for these friendly happy parties.

The party “ guests “ pay an entrance fee then as listed in this post on the grid “ guests “ are paying for their seating.

When you pay your sent the address to the location 4126 West Chester Pike.

[Charlie Alexander @Chuckles152]

For all the other pics go to my Facebook and see it there https://t.co/y6mPfUMIKa

[Charlie Alexander @Chuckles152]

My Poppop always told me “Believe Half of What you See and None of What you hear.” This isn’t a Public Relations Post: Let’s first talk nothing but the facts about Saturday Night’s Party and What has been going on here at West Chester Pike in Newtown Square. I will be following these up with some questions I think we should all want to have answered:

1. There is a house on West Chester Pike in Newtown Square with a pool that has been hosting parties all summer long. Residents are tired of it and have contacted me in order to speak up so I did. I did not post at their request at first but did after I received a phone call at 2am.(Screenshots Provided)

2. There was a party, that’s parking was directed by party hosts to Drexel Lodge Park and the field there. So we’re talking many guests.(videos provided)

3. There was armed guards on the premises(photos provided)according to 3 officers of the Newtown Police Department, the officers did not check to see if they had their Act 235 which governs privately employed armed security personnel who carry a firearm as part of their job. The Pennsylvania State Police administers the certification program(screenshot of conversation provided)

4. Seating at Tables, Sofas and lounge chairs was sold to be a part of this event.(screenshot provided) Entrance fees were charged as well

5. People from the party were walking in West Chester Pike.(Photo and video provided by concerned citizens)

6. A security guard from the party had to stop not to hit 2 girls with his car and a young woman rear ended him. He then got out of his car still carrying his firearm, which was an AR according to her mother and aunt, and wearing his body armor and scared the girl.(Screenshot Provided)

7. There was only 2 Newtown Square Police officers on duty on Saturday evening. (Screenshot provided)

8. Both officers were dispatched to Drexel Lodge Park where a fight had broken out earlier in the evening.(Screenshot Provided)

9. A former Sgt. of the Newtown Police Department went on Facebook, claimed he was speaking to an officer on site and then went on to say that the reason they didn’t break up the party was possibly due to race and being outnumbered.(screenshots provided)

10. The promoter for this party and for others rents rooms out for some of these parties(screenshots provided). This same individual owns Boarding Houses for Teenage Girls(Screenshots provided)

My questions for Newtown Township and their Police Department:
1. Why have residents been ignored for months?
2. Why wouldn’t you have more than 2 officers covering Newtown Ttownship on a given shift?
3. Were there underage girls at this party?
4. Is there prostitution going on at these parties with these expensive rented bedrooms?
5. Why weren’t the cars parked illegally at Drexel Lodge Park towed away when the park signs even say the park is only open from Dawn until dusk?
6. Why weren’t the security guards checked for their Act 235?
7. Why was a cop parked there allowing people to show up in droves seemingly protecting party goers before the fight ever happened? Video provided

My 2 questions for those who are angrier about me posting what happened and the video of the party

1. Why are you angrier at me for just showing what went on at the behest of community members and a car accident victim’s family than those who allowed this to go on for months and did not shut it down?
2. Why is certain individuals so pro wild party? Are these individuals trashing me so much because they’re involved in some way?
3. For those mad at me about not saying something when this happened in Broomall: I had no idea it even happened and only learned years later. I wasn’t politically active then but had I known I absolutely would have. I rarely used Facebook until 2024

[Leah Hoopes @hoopes_leah]

I will burn it all down.

My comfort. My reputation. My livelihood. Everything I own. Everything I have built.

I will lose every fucking thing before I trade the truth for self-preservation.

That is the part people still don't understand about me.

You cannot control someone with the threat of losing everything when they have already decided there are things more important than what they own.
I kept the receipts. I kept the record. I kept the truth.
And if telling it costs me everything, so be it.
I promised you lying pieces of shit who stepped on my back to sell your bullshit stories I will never forget.
You will be exposed for the manipulation, lying , deceptive insanity during those years.
I don't let shit slide, I don't move on , I sit back and wait .

Accountability is coming you fucking frauds.

[@Chicago1Ray 🇺🇸 @Chicago1Ray]

IT'S WORTH ANOTHER TRY 🚨

Raise your hand ✋️ if you want @realDonaldTrump to use the authority vested in him under (Art-II-sec 3) to call the Senate back into session, in order to debate the Save America Act

You did it before.. Trump does hear you

THE POWER OF X IS REAL 💥

[Freckles McGillacutty MAGA @jac45365245]

💥BLAST FROM THE RECENT PAST💥

Reported federal probe into Ellen Greenberg case could bring scrutiny for Gov. Shapiro https://t.co/Yf29Q4v7WR

[Leah Hoopes @hoopes_leah]

I am the person who wants to be left alone.
I don't want your power, your position, your connections, your approval or an invitation to your club. But people fundamentally misunderstand people like me.
I will burn it all down around me before I surrender the truth. My own comfort. Everything I own. Everything I worked for. I will walk away with nothing and start over before I let someone use what I have to control me.That makes intimidation useless.
You can't threaten me with losing something I have already accepted I may have to lose.
I wanted to be left alone. I wanted to live my life, raise my family, do my work and mind my own business. But once you decide I am not allowed to do that, once you come for my name, my work, my livelihood, my rights or the truth, I become willing to lose everything I was trying to protect in the first place.

I have lost before. I have had nothing before. I rebuilt before. I'll do it again.I wanted to be left alone. They decided to come for me.
Then I figured out that while everyone was busy "minding their business," the people running things were counting on exactly that. Now they are angry because I won't. They want to protect their circles, their secrets and their lies.

I make them uncomfortable. I live in their heads. I occupy their thoughts because I shine a light on the things they would rather nobody look at.
They want you to mind your business. Be silent. Accept the explanation. Be comforted by the deception and look the other way when something doesn't add up.I won't.
People warned me before I ever stepped into this arena that these people would come for me. I marched forward anyway. I knew there would be a price.
I will not be silenced.The Republic is my business. The truth is my business.And if standing on the truth costs me everything, then everything can go.

Possessions, material things, status and comfort have value to them, so they assume those things can be used as leverage over me. They continue down the same linear path believing eventually something will make me stop. Instead, they become angry, obsessed and sloppy. And every time they do, I document it. I am not going anywhere.I will not fall back.
My trench is dug. I will continue pushing forward. I will continue watching. I will continue documenting. I will continue letting them make mistakes and building the record.
You cannot buy my silence with comfort, and you cannot threaten me into submission by taking it away.

I will not trade my integrity for comfort.

[Leah Hoopes @hoopes_leah]

This is our sting operation in Delaware County, PA. I was a contributor to Project Veritas after I reached out to them directly. I was working directly with Spencer Meads. This operation was developed by Gregory Stenstrom, Leah Hoopes and we brought in the whistleblower directing her at every point.

FORMAL POSITION STATEMENT

The issue is being deliberately mischaracterized.

This is not about recognition, ego, or attribution in the colloquial sense. This is about evidentiary integrity and credibility of source material.

Where individuals with first-hand knowledge and direct involvement in the development of evidence are omitted, misidentified, or dismissed, the consequences are not superficial they are fatal to the reliability of the record.

1. Authorship establishes foundation.
Evidence does not exist in a vacuum. It must be tied to a competent witness or originating party who can authenticate its creation, methodology, and accuracy.

2. Misattribution undermines admissibility.
When third parties republish, summarize, or distort investigative findings without proper identification of the original source, they sever the evidentiary chain. That is not a social slight—it is a legal defect.

3. This is not “credit”—it is chain of custody.
Labeling originators as “seeking attention” is a deliberate tactic used to avoid engaging with the substance of the evidence. It reframes a structural legal requirement as a personality flaw. That argument is frivolous and should be rejected outright.

4. Anger is not disqualifying—it is contextual.
When individuals invest substantial time, resources, and risk exposure to develop evidence of serious wrongdoing, objection to its misuse or misrepresentation is not “jealousy.” It is a rational response to the degradation of the evidentiary record.

5. Unauthorized use creates liability.
Any party leveraging investigative work while stripping attribution or altering context assumes risk, including:

Misrepresentation of facts

Inability to authenticate evidence

Exposure in any proceeding where foundation is challenged.

CONCLUSION

The position is simple:

If you intend to use the work, you identify the source. If you cannot identify the source, you cannot validate the evidence. If you cannot validate the evidence, it collapses.

Attempts to reduce this to personality attacks or accusations of ego are not only irrelevant—they are indicative of a lack of substantive rebuttal.

If you strip out the people who developed it, you destroy the chain of custody and the ability to prove it.

Labeling that concern as “jealousy” is a deflection tactic used by people who don’t want to deal with the facts.

You don’t get to use the work and erase the source.

I have been blocked by Patrick Byrne—an individual who has used evidence developed through our work, obtained through our former attorney Stefanie Lambert, and then leveraged that material to raise money.

That is not advocacy. That is exploitation.

Stop reframing this as an issue of “credit.” That characterization is false and it is being used to dismiss a far more serious problem.

This conduct:

Misappropriates investigative work developed through substantial time, risk, and resources

Breaks the chain of custody of critical evidence

Distorts underlying facts, including timelines, participants, and third-party involvement

Places the original investigators at risk while removing their ability to authenticate the record

Those are not minor issues. Those are defects that can destroy the evidentiary value of the work entirely.

And yet, the public is being told this is acceptable—as long as the information “gets out.”

No. That standard is reckless.

Evidence that cannot be properly sourced, verified, and authenticated is compromised. Once compromised, it is vulnerable to attack, dismissal, and exclusion. That does not advance any cause—it undermines it.

Being told to “eat crow for the sake of the movement” is not strategy. It is complicity in misconduct.

My standard is not negotiable: If you use the work, you identify the source.
If you alter the facts, you disclose it.
If you raise money on the back of that work, you answer for it.

Anything less is dishonest and corrosive to the integrity of the record.

If anyone believes this conduct is defensible, then take the position publicly.

I am inviting an open, public discussion on the record.

[Leah Hoopes @hoopes_leah]

CEASE AND DESIST, DEMAND FOR PRESERVATION OF EVIDENCE, AND NOTICE OF DISPUTED USE OF INVESTIGATIVE MATERIALS

Date: August 11, 2026

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL AND/OR CERTIFIED MAIL

TO: Stefanie Lambert, Esq.

RE: Unauthorized Use, Transfer, Dissemination, Mischaracterization, and/or Exploitation of Evidence and Investigative Materials

Ms. Lambert:

This letter constitutes formal notice and demand that you immediately cease and desist from using, transferring, disseminating, representing, characterizing, monetizing, or facilitating third-party use of investigative materials, evidence, documents, information, timelines, witness information, or work product originating from or developed by Gregory Stenstrom and/or me where you lack authorization to do so or where the provenance and circumstances under which those materials were obtained are not accurately disclosed.

You previously served as our attorney. Through that relationship, you obtained access to evidence, information, witnesses, investigative materials, communications, and factual information developed through years of work by the individuals with first-hand knowledge of the underlying events.

This is not a dispute over “credit.”

I am in possession of contemporaneous records, texts, emails, and communications that establish the origin of the sting operation and demonstrate that Tom Carroll was introduced to us in the course of these events. These materials further reflect that you were provided information by us under the stated guise of protecting a whistleblower. I also have plane tickets, contracts, and investigative reporting secured by Deborah Silver, who can also attest that Regina was working with Greg and me at the time, as well as with Project Veritas.

The provenance of evidence matters. The identity of the individuals who obtained, developed, preserved, transmitted, witnessed, or can authenticate evidence matters. The dates, times, locations, participants, third parties, companies, circumstances, and methods by which evidence was obtained matter.

Removing those facts, changing them, omitting them, or transmitting evidence through third parties without preserving its provenance can compromise authentication, foundation, chain of custody, witness testimony, credibility, and ultimately the evidentiary value of the material itself.

I have serious concerns regarding materials and information originating from our work subsequently being used or disseminated by third parties, including Patrick Byrne, without proper identification of the people who developed the evidence and without an accurate presentation of the underlying factual record.

Accordingly, you are hereby directed to:

1. CEASE AND DESIST from representing, expressly or implicitly, that evidence or investigative material originating from our work was independently developed by you or any third party where that representation is inaccurate.

2. CEASE AND DESIST from providing, transferring, publishing, distributing, or facilitating further dissemination of our materials where you do not possess lawful authorization to do so.

3. CEASE AND DESIST from altering, omitting, or materially mischaracterizing the provenance, chronology, participants, circumstances, or factual context associated with those materials.

4. CEASE AND DESIST from facilitating the commercial exploitation or fundraising use of those materials where the fundraising representation creates a false or misleading impression regarding who developed, obtained, investigated, authenticated, or preserved the underlying evidence.

5. PRESERVE ALL EVIDENCE relating to your receipt, possession, transfer, disclosure, dissemination, discussion, publication, or use of materials originating from Gregory Stenstrom and/or me.

This preservation demand includes, without limitation, emails, text messages, Signal messages, Telegram messages, WhatsApp communications, direct messages, cloud-storage records, shared drives, file-transfer records, metadata, photographs, videos, recordings, drafts, notes, memoranda, engagement records, attorney files, invoices, donor or fundraising communications, communications with Patrick Byrne, communications with entities associated with Byrne, and communications with any third party concerning the evidence or information at issue.

Do not delete, alter, overwrite, destroy, conceal, modify, wipe, reset, or permit the automatic destruction of potentially relevant electronically stored information. Any applicable auto-delete or disappearing-message functions concerning relevant information should be disabled to the extent necessary to preserve existing evidence.

You are further requested to provide a written accounting identifying:

- The materials originating from Gregory Stenstrom and/or me that you possessed or received;
- The persons or entities to whom those materials were provided or made accessible;
- The approximate dates of each disclosure or transfer;
- The method by which each disclosure or transfer occurred;
- Whether Patrick Byrne or anyone acting on his behalf received any such materials directly or indirectly from you;
- Whether any such material was used in fundraising, publications, presentations, litigation, media appearances, documentaries, websites, social-media content, donor solicitations, or other commercial or promotional activity; and
- The present location and custodians of copies of those materials.

Because you obtained information while acting as counsel, you are also on notice that this matter potentially implicates obligations independent of ordinary disputes over ownership or attribution, including duties concerning former-client information and materials. Nothing contained in this notice waives any attorney-client privilege, confidentiality protection, work-product protection, ownership claim, cause of action, disciplinary remedy, or other right.

You are not authorized to construe silence regarding any particular document, communication, disclosure, recipient, or incident as consent, waiver, ratification, or acquiescence.

This letter is a demand for immediate cessation and preservation. It is not an exhaustive statement of the facts, evidence, legal theories, damages, remedies, or individuals and entities potentially involved.

All rights, claims, causes of action, privileges, objections, and remedies are expressly reserved.

Provide written confirmation that relevant materials and electronically stored information are being preserved and that the conduct identified above has ceased.

Sincerely,

Leah Hoopes

[Val @ValRichards_7]

@Chuckles152 What? When? Who?

[Charlie Alexander @Chuckles152]

There’s going to be something revealed about that party and I want everyone to remember who attacked me over it. Remember please.

[Senator Aric Nesbitt @SenAricNesbitt]

🚨MORE FRAUD IN MICHIGAN.

Jocelyn Bensons elections are a corrupt MESS.

Keep digging James. It’s time for REAL accountability!

[Rep. Josh Schriver @JoshuaSchriver]

SHARE THIS