𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔 👁️

⚔️ • 🇬🇷 ∆ Humanitarian ∆ Futurist ∆ Apolitical ∆ Health And Fitness Enthusiast ∆ Music Mixer ∆ Life Path 11 ∆ ♒ Sun ∆ ♋ Moon ∆ ♎ Rising ∆

[𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔 👁️ @VibeHigh369]

Sexual energy is what creates life, literally. When you expel this vital sexual energy in short-term sexual acts you do not allow the life energy to build inside of yourself. ~ Victor Pride

#SemenRetention

🎶 Jaxson Gamble ~ Power

[𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔 👁️ @VibeHigh369]

@FoodPleaser 10-15 😂

[𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔 👁️ @VibeHigh369]

@PolymarketSport That is not a trader, that is a gambler.

[𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔 👁️ @VibeHigh369]

@PolymarketSport

[𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔 👁️ @VibeHigh369]

@Cointelegraph Maybe they should start mining $KASPA

[𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔 👁️ @VibeHigh369]

@RobTheHockeyGuy

[𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔 👁️ @VibeHigh369]

@Aceboy6868 @Kelsisheren I, too, am not angry. They want people angry, it keeps them in a low vibration, which they can feed on. Also, what are all these angry people doing about it, nothing, they're bitching and moaning on X, which is not accomplishing anything, but engagement from other angry people.

[𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔 👁️ @VibeHigh369]

Source: GROK

Bill C-9 (the Combatting Hate Act) does not directly criminalize Bible quotes or religious texts online (or offline)

It is an amendment to Canada's Criminal Code aimed at addressing hate crimes, intimidation at places of worship/schools/cultural sites, and public display of certain hate/terrorist symbols (e.g., Nazi swastika, specific terrorist flags). It passed the House of Commons and has advanced significantly (as of mid-2026, it has received royal assent or is very close).9f67fc
Key Relevant Change

The main controversy for religious speech is the removal of a prior defense in section 319 hate propaganda offences (wilful promotion of hatred or antisemitism). Previously, subsection 319(3)(b) provided a full defense if the statements were made "in good faith" as an opinion on a religious subject or based on a belief in a religious text.6c8753

This defense is repealed for the relevant hate propaganda offences.
There is still a high legal threshold for conviction: speech must wilfully promote hatred (defined as extreme detestation/vilification that goes far beyond dislike, offense, or disagreement) and meet other criteria (e.g., public communication likely to lead to breach of the peace in some cases).

New clarifications in the bill emphasize that mere statements that "discredit, humiliate, hurt, or offend" do not constitute hatred.

Attorney General consent is still generally required for proceedings on core hate propaganda offences.

Does This Ban or Criminalize Quoting the Bible? No blanket ban. Government statements, Senate sponsors, and legal analyses (e.g., from the Canadian Constitution Foundation) confirm that simply reading, quoting, preaching, or discussing Bible passages (or texts from the Torah, Quran, etc.) is not criminalized. Theological discussions, pastoral counseling, and sincere faith expressions generally do not meet the "wilful promotion of hatred" threshold.

Context matters heavily. Isolated quotes (even controversial ones like Leviticus 20:13 on sexual morality) are unlikely to trigger charges on their own. However, if used in a broader context of extreme vilification, detestation, or incitement against an identifiable group (e.g., based on sexual orientation, religion, etc.), it could now face prosecution without the old religious defense. Proving "wilful" intent and the extreme standard is difficult.

Online posting falls under the same rules as other public communication.

Other Parts of the Bill New offences for intimidating or obstructing access to religious/cultural places, schools, etc. (up to 10 years).

Standalone hate crime offence enhancing penalties for underlying crimes motivated by hatred.

Symbol display ban (with exceptions for legitimate purposes like education/journalism).

Criticisms and Context Critics (including Conservatives, faith groups, and civil liberties advocates) argue the removal of the religious defense chills free speech and religious freedom, potentially exposing pastors, parents, or online posters to investigations over traditional teachings on topics like sexuality or sin. Supporters say it closes a "loophole" for hate disguised as religion while preserving Charter protections (freedom of expression/religion under sections 2(a)/(b)).

The bill was subject to Charter review. Courts will ultimately interpret it, and challenges are expected. It does not target Christianity or the Bible specifically—it applies to any religious texts or speech that crosses into prohibited hate. Claims of outright "criminalizing Bible quotes" are overstated but reflect genuine concerns about eroded protections and vague enforcement risks. For the exact text, see official parliamentary sources.

[𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔 👁️ @VibeHigh369]

@grok @BandLab

[𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔 👁️ @VibeHigh369]

🇻 🇦 🇬 🇦 🇧 🇴 🇳 🇩 

~ Mix Created With @BandLab

~ Visuals Created With @grok

~ 𝐔𝐬𝐞 🎧 𝐅𝐨𝐫 𝐀 𝐁𝐞𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐒𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝
𝐄𝐱𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞

[𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔 👁️ @VibeHigh369]

@grok @BandLab

[𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔 👁️ @VibeHigh369]

@Shadow_ofaDoubt @mmysticbloom @Tablesalt13 @CountDankulaTV America's constitution can be suspended at any time, and they can also introduce new bills/acts under the Patriot Act, for safety.

[𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔 👁️ @VibeHigh369]

@FringedCanuck My location stays off unless I need to call a ride service.

[𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔 👁️ @VibeHigh369]

Yes, I'm aware of what is going on in the UK, show me a court case of those being criminally charged for tweeting a Bible verse, or posting something that the government found to be a criminal offense. You think America isn't going to adopt this? UK, Australia, Canada is the testing ground, before it's implemented in America.

[𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔 👁️ @VibeHigh369]

@Shadow_ofaDoubt @mmysticbloom @Tablesalt13 If you really think people are going to be criminally charged for what you mentioned, then live in fear.

[𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔 👁️ @VibeHigh369]

@IAmSteveHarvey Obeying a tyrannical and totalitarian draconian government.

[𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔 👁️ @VibeHigh369]

Oh no, I'm going to get tracked going to work, picking up groceries, going for a walk, and walking out the front door sitting on a chair. 😂🤣 Have fun! On a side note, I keep my phone in airplane mode 99% of the time, not because I don't want to get tracked, I really don't give two fucks if they track me, it's for the sole purpose of battery preservation and health purposes when it's in my pocket.

[𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔 👁️ @VibeHigh369]

@mmysticbloom @Tablesalt13 Even though I believe people have the right to privacy and this is a pure totalitarian draconian invasion of privacy, the only people afraid of this, are those who are engaged in nefarious behavior.

[𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔 👁️ @VibeHigh369]

@HerDivineEye @liberal_party Don't be afraid, that's exactly what they want. If people don't like what others post and find offensive, there's a mute and block button for that.

[𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔 👁️ @VibeHigh369]

@Kalshi

[𝑪𝒉𝒓𝒊𝒔 👁️ @VibeHigh369]

@JCCFCanada "Safety"