Narok County delegates make changes to their leadership. Elect officials on interim basis to replace Chairman, Women Leader and Youth Leader who have chosen to advance other interests. Details in the statement below 👇
@Kenyans You guys you are more than just rich if you can manage to spend a whooping over 7M Kenyan money to watch world cup while am this hungry 😩, awuoro
@Kenyans You guys you are more than just rich if you can manage to spend a whooping over 7M Kenyan money to watch world cup while am this hungry 😩, awuoro
🚨BREAKING FROM ELRC: YOU CAN WIN AN UNFAIR TERMINATION CASE... AND STILL LEAVE COURT OWING YOUR EMPLOYER MILLIONS.
The ELRC has delivered one of the most remarkable employment law decisions in recent times. In Kenneth Mwangi v Multigraph Machinery (K) Ltd (ELRC Cause No. E1088 of 2023), an engineer successfully proved that his dismissal was procedurally unfair because his employer failed to follow the mandatory requirements under Sections 41, 43 and 45 of the Employment Act. Although the employer alleged poor performance and had genuine complaints about the quality of his work, the Court held that poor performance alone is never enough. An employer must first set measurable performance targets, objectively assess the employee, provide support through a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP), and conduct a fair performance hearing before terminating employment. Since those safeguards were ignored, the Court awarded the employee KES. 241,668 as compensation for unfair termination. But that was only half the story.
The case took a dramatic turn because the employer had filed a counterclaim seeking KES. 1,452,112.12 for losses allegedly caused by the employee's negligent workmanship, including damaged printing machinery, incorrect diagnoses, unnecessary purchase of spare parts, and the cost of flying engineers from India to rectify the defects. While the employee denied the allegations in his pleadings, he never tendered evidence during trial to challenge the counterclaim. The Court therefore found the employer's evidence entirely uncontroverted and entered judgment for the full amount. The result is that the same employee who established unfair termination walked away with KES. 241,668 on his claim, yet simultaneously became liable to pay his employer over KES. 1.45 million. The judgment is a powerful reminder that procedural unfairness and substantive liability are two completely different questions.
This decision sends an equally important message to both employers and employees. Employers should understand that notice clauses do not override the Employment Act; every termination for poor performance must follow a structured, fair process grounded in due process and measurable evaluation. Employees, on the other hand, should not assume that succeeding in an unfair termination claim immunizes them from accountability. If an employer has a legitimate counterclaim and supports it with credible evidence, silence can be extremely expensive. Litigation is not a gamble to be entered lightly. It is a search for the truth, and the truth may ultimately favor both parties in different ways. This is a judgment every employer, employee and mwananchi ought to read before assuming that an unfair dismissal case can only have one winner.
Kindly repost widely 🙏
Riggy asking people to stay at home as the government had goons out to cause harm shows leadership.
Raila would be at the front leading his sheep to the slaughter house for a pay hand cheque.
Then later start crying faul.
@HonOmanyo Good evening our SG
My name is Victor Osiemo from Uyoma North Ward, Rarieda Constituency. I am an ODM supporter and aspiring MCA for 2027.
I greatly admire your leadership and would appreciate an opportunity to share my vision and seek your guidance.
Thank you.
Good evening Hon. Omanyo.
My name is Victor Osiemo from Uyoma North Ward, Rarieda Constituency. I am an ODM supporter and aspiring MCA for 2027.
I greatly admire your leadership and would appreciate an opportunity to share my vision and seek your guidance.
Thank you.
@HonOmanyo