@Woirble@Lipsman@UO_TDs_89@TaylorStCap@DReds928 Would a Wilson ruling with language laying out the coordinated obstruction by California help in damages case? Did Bonta read between the lines of that state park ruling and see the train is about t-bone him and the state? Can’t afford risk of depositions?
@Derk_Everett@Trending_TROC You could structure where $SOC production in California is traded in kind with Chevron for their Gulf of Mexico offshore production to SPR. Provides feedstock to local California mkt while filling SPR without excess shipping costs.
@Woirble Bonta agreed to delay responses by DoJ by 30 days today in joint motion with DoJ in California vs Wright. Now due July 8th. Weird and wacky things going on.
Sable Offshore Corp. (“Sable”)(NYSE: SOC) plans to post a new investor presentation to its corporate website before market open on Monday, June 1, 2026 and plans to host a conference call to discuss the new investor presentation on Monday June 1, 2026 at 10:00am CDT / 11:00am EDT. $SOC
Wilson from top rope today....
"Finally, Plaintiff (Cal State Parks) asserts that its inability to conduct environment review and assess pipeline safety may constitute irreparable harm. That argument is also unavailing. Plaintiff may not use its contracting power to effect or impose safety regulations on a pipeline beyond the scope of its authority. Plaintiff’s noted concerns about its inability to address environmental and safety concerns undoubtedly refer to an inability to regulate the Pipeline’s use. Under the binding Consent Decree, however, regulation of the Pipeline is to be controlled by California’s Office of the State Fire Marshall (“OSFM”). Consequently, there is no irreparable harm in Plaintiff’s inability to regulate, because Plaintiff, who is also a party to the Consent Decree, has no regulatory authority over the Pipeline of which it may be deprived."
Wonder how he really feels. $SOC