@yugalabs If you guys truly were innocent, you would be acknowledging the shocking similarities, be disgusted, and rebrand. Instead, you’re solely writing it off as a smear campaign. While that might be true, it also is ridiculous to not acknowledge the glaring imagery in your project.
So Nate’s going down for 20eth worth of insider trading. @zagabond took hundreds and hundreds of eth from the community and played it off as a “learning experience” — let’s guess who’s next on the feds list
I think a lot of people are not quite seeing the whole story on the latest @NFTethics post.
Going to do my best to write a quick summary of it! A thread.
1/ We will still provide some additional information on Azuki. Zagabond himself said that he expects to be doxxed at some point and that that is fine, so we will do that. For storytelling & learning purposes of course, and to create a bridge between the physical & digital world.
Let's take a minute to discuss Azuki, Zagabond, and what we can do about the situation moving forward. I've seen a lot of takes, both from Azuki holders and not, that I quite simply don't agree with. 1/🧵
Everyone called us names when we said @BoredBunnyNFT was a rug 3 wks before mint, then when we questioned @tmntnft legitimacy,
now everyone dont agree on our @AzukiOfficial RUG post.
The fact is we been right 99% of the times regardless if u like us or not! They all RUG!
List of people who are just learning:
1. Zagabond
2. Syber
3. Beanie
4. Those two idiots in LA (Frosties)
5. Old Jungle Freaks dude
6. Ramo
7. Pudgy Cole
8. Nanopass Julius
9. Yuga Labs
10. 888
11. Squiggles Bros
Who else we got?