“what does not kill you, makes you stronger” learning languages, law and from my mistakes. Like to travel, poker, sport. Working as a croupier in casino
@Aku_700@DHSgov@WhiteHouse officer should have asked "are you going to strike me or you just want to drive away" ??
those arguments that she just wanted to drive away are crazy and delutional...officer cant deduce what she wants to do when her car goes towards to him
@chilypeps4life@RepJayapal Excatly...and also If someone tells i am not mad at you - it is usually the opposite, she was an activists - she definitely was mad at ICE
@RepJayapal Unarmed ? You are lying! She had a vehicle as weapon driving toward to officer, she did not turning the wheels toward the other end of the street but toward against him! Also He could not deduce whether she was turning away or about to strike him
@ericswalwell As a citizen of CZ, I do not know the parties in USA detaily. I do not like trump. But I do not like you either. I do not believe you a word, using a case for your own policits so hard. Btw, she also was activists and in critical moment she used vehicle as weapon
@joncoopertweets As much as I am sorry for the loss, as I do not like trump in USA and his cabinet. In critical moment, she used vehicle as a weapon and officer had right to do what he did. He was not able to deduce whether she was turning away or about to strike him
@RepSwalwell Secondly I do not like agents behavior dragging her handle and saying "get out of the car" or saying "fuckin bitch" BUT! In this case she was not mom, she was an activists - blocking the road for whatever reason. She interfere with ICE previously and she was warned!
@RepSwalwell As much as I do not like trump in USA and his cabinet. In critical moment, she used vehicle as a weapon and officer had right to do what he did. He was not able to deduce if she has intention to go toward to him or she is turning to the right. Tennessee v. Garner
@CRTinyDuffy@BigBlueWaveUSA After a reviewing many times the situation I can declare that vehicle was used as a weapon and agent had a right to do what he has done. And this is case as Tennessee v. Garner
@CRTinyDuffy@BigBlueWaveUSA Tennessee v. Garner explicitly requires an immediate and objective threat at the moment force is used — not prior experiences.
@CRTinyDuffy@BigBlueWaveUSA R u insane ? By your conclusions if i experience a thief then I expect everyone to be thiefs ? What a fucking low mindset. He literally said "get the fuck out of the car, without a proper call and immidiatelly started to drag a handle. How can u justify this shit.
@worldhockeyrpt canadian player had no intention to play , just hitting the player whatever it costs and he did not care where, it surely was not hit on body. Those are dangerous acts on player health and cause pernament damage, you are delusinoal if you think it is correct, especially in junior
@ExtraLars There is a possibility of faking, we cant say it 100%. But that canadian player had no intention to play , just hitting the player whatever it costs and he did not care where, it surely was not hit on body. Those are dangerous acts on player health, imo that is correct to punish
@PREZIDENTmluvci Ani mě to nepřekvapuje, že neumí uznat prohru nebo jiný/většinový názor, i když je to proti všem zvykům.
Ještě, že se mu ty dny předsedy vlády hodně rychle krátí. A panu Zemanovi to prezidentování také.