Forecaster. Geopolitics, military operations, finance. Analysis and forecasts at the intersection of three axes. Global team. Open-source intelligence.
took Goldman Sachs 6 months to catch up to what we said in February: $120+ oil if Hormuz closes. They were at $80–90 back then. We weren't. This isn't luck — it's structural analysis. Markets don't move on news. They move on reality. We just see it earlier.
Our analytical brief — Iran, straits, oil, Europe. The world map we've been tracking on X since June. 4-part visual breakdown with forecasts, confirmations, and structural outlook. Markets are still catching up. We're already ahead.
@Alafasy كلامك صحيح، إيران تقبل قواعد روسيا وترفض قواعد أمريكا. الفرق: روسيا دعمت الأسد، أمريكا تريد السيطرة على المنطقة. إيران ليست ضد القواعد الأجنبية، هي ضد القواعد التي لا تخدم مصالحها.
@EdyCohen Edy is right: Iran is targeting Arab oil. But the US is trapped — its Gulf allies are its weak link. If the straits close, the US can't protect them, replace the oil, or walk away. Iran isn't fighting imperialism — it's fighting the US through Arab wallets.
Edy is right: Iran is targeting Arab oil, not Israel. But the US is trapped — its Gulf allies are its weak link. If straits close, the US can't protect them, can't replace the oil, and can't walk away. Iran isn't fighting imperialism. It's fighting the US through Arab wallets.
إيران بتهدد بإغلاق مضيق هرمز أو السيطرة الكاملة عليه، والدول العربية المنتجة للنفط هي أول المتضررين وليس اسرائيل على فكرة.
مش أمريكا اللي راح تدفع الثمن الأكبر، العرب هم اللي راح يدفعوا.
إيران ما بتحارب "الاستكبار"، هي بتحارب العرب وبتستخدم هرمز كسلاح اقتصادي ضدهم.
هذي هي الحقيقة اللي ما بدّن يحكوا فيها.
@NewsNow4world1 Gulf unity against Iran doesn't secure the region — it opens another gate of hell. Full-scale war means either Iran's destruction with massive collateral damage, or a regional war that drags everyone in. There's no quick end to serious escalation. Markets still don't get it.
It's amusing watching parts of the Islamic world thank Trump for bombing Iran. They don't realize they're next. Resources are the real target — always have been, always will be. Today it's Tehran. Tomorrow, it could be anyone with oil, gas, or a strait.
@isaacrrr7 The US is preparing a larger war — but it lacks munitions to sustain it. Patriot and THAAD are low. Escalation will close Hormuz and Bab-el-Mandeb, even temporarily. That alone sends oil to $120+. Iran doesn't need to win — just make the war too expensive.
Buffett selling isn't about stocks. It's about what he sees: Europe won't recover — crops failed, fertilizer is gone, Ukraine is dead, Russia won't sell. Refugees will flood the EU by winter. This isn't a market correction. It's a structural shift. Cash is waiting.
🚨 BREAKING 📷 WARREN BUFFETT SAYS THE U.S. DOLLAR WILL COLLAPSE DUE TO GOVERNMENT POLICY BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY JUST SOLD $24.1 BILLION IN STOCKS THIS EXTENDS ITS SELLING STREAK TO 14 STRAIGHT QUARTERS THE LONGEST IN BERKSHIRE’S HISTORY THIS IS NOT LOOKING GOOD...
@HamedMusher Confirms what I said back in March: Kharg is the red line. If the US lands, Iran will destroy it themselves — scorched earth, not surrender. 90% of their oil exports go through that island. They won't lose it. They'll burn it. That's not bluff. That's the final act.
@MarioNawfal This is what we've been saying: the US is running out of interceptors, precision weapons, and options. War of attrition isn't a theory—it's structural. Diplomacy is cover for regrouping. IRGC knows this. Markets don't. $120+ oil is still on the table.
@War_Radar2 Not an invasion — a setup. IRGC is moving tanks to the Iraq border to block a ground route, while their real strike is "Nasr-2": blinding US radars and hitting Patriot systems in Kuwait and Bahrain. No ground war. Just systemic attrition. This is exactly what we've been tracking
@MarioNawfal One town, still in Lebanon. "Step in the right direction" — but Israel occupies significant parts of the south. The same story, different day. Withdrawals are tactical, not strategic. The US wants a photo op, not a solution.
@amjadt25 Exactly. NATO was built for a different era. Today, Iran runs the straits, Russia gains influence, and the West debates. The IRGC isn't waiting for NATO to act — it's already acting. The problem isn't lack of capability. It's lack of will.
@WSJ Hezbollah isn't a militia — it's a state within a state. Disarming it means restructuring Lebanon. That's not happening. IRGC knows this. Israel knows this. US knows this. So we're back to "no easy options" — which is just a polite way of saying "no options."
WSJ admits: Hezbollah can't be disarmed. It's not just a militia — it's society. Lebanon is a hostage. Israel can't win, US can't leave. This is the new normal. And IRGC is behind it all. Markets still don't get it. #Lebanon#Hezbollah#IRGC
American, Israeli and Lebanese officials are finding there are no easy options to disarm Hezbollah, a U.S.-designated terrorist group that is embedded in society and bound to its cause with religious zeal. https://t.co/0XiitvmGrS
@OmarBlooshiAE Interesting how the world calls Hamas "terrorists" but IRGC — which runs Iran, finances Hezbollah, and controls the Houthis — gets a pass. Same methods, different label. D.C. will talk to anyone when it's convenient.
Iran says US ground invasion will be "eliminated" instantly. Meanwhile US intelligence admits strikes aren't working. This isn't a war plan — it's a stalemate with extra steps. No ground invasion. No win. Just limbo. Markets still priced for 1980.
CIA confirms what we've been saying since June: strikes won't break Iran. 3–4 months of blockade before real pain. US stuck in limbo between war and peace. No middle ground — either full-scale war or ceasefire. Markets still not ready.
🚨🇺🇸 🇮🇷 A new U.S. intelligence assessment delivers the verdict Trump doesn't want: the strikes won't move Iran, and the war is stuck in "indefinite limbo."
-Per the Washington Post, analysts conclude Iran's government is unlikely to feel significant impact or soften its negotiating position from the new rounds of strikes, with the CIA-authored report already briefed to the administration
-The agencies see Washington and Tehran stuck "in an indefinite limbo between peace and war," and a May CIA analysis found Iran could survive the naval blockade for three to four MONTHS before severe hardship
-Former intelligence officer Jonathan Panikoff on the administration's hit-harder theory: "That assessment is almost certainly incorrect," because the regime's top priority is survival and it will absorb blows "despite the harm to its people and economy"
-Rubio acknowledged the internal split openly: Iranians in government tell the U.S. they want a deal, "but there's a tension" with hardliners, and he doesn't know what happens if the hardliners win
-Both Mojtaba and Ghalibaf spent the weekend urging "unity" as the condition for victory, the regime closing ranks
The assessment lands directly on the fork Axios described: ten nights of bombing, three American deaths, and the government's own analysts concluding the current course produces stalemate, not capitulation.
That's the intelligence community formally pricing Option 2, the massive joint campaign, as the only military path that changes anything, while pricing the 10-day ceasefire as the only exit that doesn't require it.
Source: Washington Post / Writer: Daniel
@MarioNawfal This is exactly what we've been saying: strikes won't break IRGC, Khamenei is a figurehead, and the US is stuck in limbo. CIA confirms — 3–4 months of blockade before serious pain. That's not a strategy, that's waiting. Option 2 or ceasefire. No middle ground.