@GopherSports@GopherFootball Uniforms are horrendous! Wear the maroon and gold and stop with the gimmicks. These are heinous. Honor the history and legacy with the classics.
@gtconway3d@OfTheBraveUSA You’re so afflicted with TDS it’s painful to watch. You are so concerned with the NY elite looking down on you because your wife worked for the guy that you blew up your family and are now just an embarrassment to yourself and WLRK.
@JasmineForUS Jasmine, doubling down on stupidity rather than taking accountability is not the path. You should start distancing yourself rather than justifying insanity. The path the Dems are on is going to shift because it won’t bring in voters and you don’t want to be holding the bag.
@tribelaw Laurence I’ve been reading your stuff for years and been a lawyer for a long time. Your latest Charlie stuff is next level batshit. Time to retire old man as your dementia has taken over.
@SenWarren Your comments on Charlie Kirk were heinous and disgusting. YES, TAKE DOWN THE TEMPERATURE YOU MORON. This has to stop. As an actual lawyer, your legal career was a joke and your professorship earned by your own lying. You’re a disgrace.
@JoJoFromJerz The reality is you’re an unhappy, fat, ugly POS who has directly participated in fomenting hate and you, “JoJofromJerz” are responsible for Charlie’s death.
@lebang_moloi You are an absolute moron. Charlie Kirk has NEVER pushed hate speech. Just because you disagree with him, the Bible and his ideas does not make it hate speech. This is the problem with you idiots. If you don’t like it, it’s “hate”…no, it isn’t.
@MLJANDJJ@SykesCharlie You’re an absolute buffoon. Dowd’s comment that “you can’t say divisive things without expecting things like this” is exactly victim blaming.” Every person on the left who calls people a fascist/nazi, etc. has blood on their hands. They incite idiots like who shot Charlie.
@ValueIsTheKey@samponder How is it ethical to move away? Are you serious? It’s totally ethical. It’s unethical to stay in a place where you’re subjecting your children to an unreasonable risk of harm. That’s your obligation. Screw these criminals.
@LawfulRiches@samponder Rich, yes, throwing them in jail IS the answer. They do not have the right to operate freely in society after causing harm to another person. “Rehabilitation” or “second chances” are not appropriate when there is a risk that another person will be harmed. Lock up time.
@PaulleyTicks@showbiz411 Did you even read the White House press release on the ballroom? It’s privately funded. Zero taxpayer dollars. Either you’re a fool who doesn’t read or a malignancy deliberately trying to deceive. Which is it?
@Seejay32chochie @_Superjudge@MarcMethot3 You’re clueless. This is a legal issue, not a moral one. He’s not “standing up for himself.” He’s defending himself against a guy charging him who continues coming. Law allows you to do exactly what he did.
@EllenFlux@_Superjudge@MarcMethot3 You keep being wrong. Guy is coming towards the big guy. You don’t have a legal duty to allow yourself to be battered. He showed remarkable restraint TBH.
@EllenFlux@MarcMethot3 Ellen you’re completely wrong. I’m a lawyer and Tarnasky exhibits perfect self defense. Size has nothing to do with it. Tarnasky had reasonable belief he would be battered when he got charged and used physical force to defend himself, even telling the guy to stop. Game over.