@aphysicist Hell yes! Need any volunteers to help uh, install/field test that Galleon? (redeye flight - can't check in to hotel yet - hands are idle - ready to pre-industrialize)
Pretty neat! Not buildable from this artifact alone (struts/shocks to nowhere, floating steering rack, who knows what interior geometry of anything looks like…), and would annoy an actual drawing checker (crossed leaders, ambiguous leader landings…) but that’s all fixable, right? Would love to try it!
@TsT3v0 Sure, I’ll give you… 1-2% less true, as measured by commercially-deployable technology actually being used in manufacturing facilities today (ie not research and one-off demo/experiments). Digital Twins are woefully difficult to keep accurate at the whole-facility level.
PSA/rant on “Digital Twin” in manufacturing: 15 years of Industry 4.0 marketing sold DT as a magic wand for factory design and optimization. Now it's a dirty word. Why? Factories evolve faster (and weirder) than twins can be [re-]authored. They decay into “dashboards with extra dimensions”.
CARVE-OUT: the DT paradigm works fine for monitoring conditions of serialized objects like products or standalone systems in the field. But that’s just a 3D veneer on SCADA/Observability, right?
Normalize quantifying American data center capacity in units of horsepower instead of soulless, anodyne SI watts.
1.341 MILLION HORSEPOWER just feels more powerful than 1 puny little ‘GW’