@tigger1972@EdgarGa58551038@Timcast It appears you believe those who do not believe in laws and use human shields would willingly give up simply because you tweeted.
@DarkMatter2525@EricLDaugh Have is so tied to pedos, we don't deserve it. I say, let it all burn so we might be reborn from their ashes at least and be inspired to recreate the benefits from their works without the cost of their labours. 2/2
@DarkMatter2525@EricLDaugh Though we disagree on much, this is one area we are completely on agreement with, though I'd go 1 step further: Patel's FBI has said that the entire infrastructure of the world would collapse if all the names were unburied at once, I say good, let it happen - if everything we 1/
@Erickschultz11@DarkMatter2525@CodyLibolt The question is, is the ideal morality achievable? If so, what will be done with the crusaders raised to pursue it? What is to be done to dragon hunters once dragons become extinct?
@avidseries And do you take the statement of the judge seriously when she refused the DNA evidence which would have either condemned or exonerated Trump to enter the trial?
@buttonfly42@TWilsonOttawa How long will it take to set up the infrastruction to export to not the US with equivalent volumes? Where will the money come from to pay for that infrasructure in the meantime? What will we be doing witg the industries who cannot make any money until then?
@thewarylemming@PatriotNorth1@TWilsonOttawa As a Canadian, you are entitled to be ruled over, but you are not entited to your own life. As a nation, we are the decendents of those who desired to be ruled, the loyalists from the American revolution who had no issue with concepts like taxation without representation. 2/2
@thewarylemming@PatriotNorth1@TWilsonOttawa No, because the Canadian electorate are idiots. This is how we got here, over 10 years of Liberal government systematically dismantling everything (whether through malice or incompetence is irrelevant).
Remember, life is not a Canadian value, but good government is: 1/
@kylekrason@EvaVlaar@timanrebel Of your losses (on paper) and should pay you 36% of your unrealized losses. Do you agree, or do you think you should be on your own if the money you were already taxed on but never received disappears? 2/2
@kylekrason@EvaVlaar@timanrebel The problem with it, as I understand as colloqually discussed (as you pointed out there aren't many details) is hpw can you pay taxes on money you don't have yet?
Also, seems to me that if the government gets a share of your wins (on paper) then they should also get a share 1/
@timanrebel@kylekrason@EvaVlaar Except that 36% you have to pay with money you don't have yet which is why it is moronic.
Also, should the government compensate you for 36% of your unrealized losses as well? Or are you own to bite that bullet?