🚨BREAKING: Marine Le Pen has taken a 19% lead in the polls to be French President
A staggering achievement
The French want their country back
Mass deportations are on the way
This is the turning point
With 5 days left till he leaves office in disgrace, Starmer has signed an agreement with the EU that paves the way for the UK to join a €90 billion Ukraine Support Loan.
Our nation is bankrupt, we have no money!
How is this even possible?
* no visible blood spatter or atomized droplets.
* 0.44-second delay between the visible impact and the first appearance of blood
*The overall wound presentation are more consistent with a medium-velocity blunt-type impact with contained or lower-pressure hemorrhage.
High-velocity rifle rounds in vascular neck tissue produce more dynamic external fluid behavior than what is recorded here. The visible reaction is consistent with impact and subsequent blood loss, but the wound signature itself more closely resembles lower-energy mechanisms.
I don’t know if you are Aware that Churches All Across America Are Being Targeted and BURNED DOWN! This is happening in Europe, Now what could be the Common Denominator? Also Islam is buying Churches and land to build Mosque. So I will ask you again who is doing this and why are they not being punished and deported?
Let's expose the fraud playbook TPUSA's structure follows, one person at a time.
First up, Tyler Bowyer.
Fraud within organizations, especially when dealing with executives, is more often than not, structural. The goal isn't to steal a lump sum, it's to build a system where money moves constantly among related entities so that no single document ever shows the whole picture, insider pay is relabeled as arm's-length business expense, and the ultimate recipient is hidden behind a layer. You don't write yourself a check. You'd design exactly what I have been seeing across all TPUSA entities.
Here's what Tyler Bowyer's playbook looks like:
1. On his own charity's return, Bowyer is the Chief Operating Officer AND its #1 outside “vendor”. $288,255 for “COO SERVICES,” invoiced from his house.
WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: a salary gets audited and a vendor invoice doesn't. Executive pay triggers board sign-off, comparability studies, reasonableness tests, an excise tax. A “purchased service” melts into the expense pile. So you stop being an employee getting paid and start being a company getting hired by yourself. Billing it from your house is the tell: there's no firm on the other end. It's you, writing invoices to a charity you run....
2. His pay is split across three entities. $288K from the charity, $88K from the political arm, $0 from TPUSA. Total: ~$376K.
WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: everyone who might catch you pulls one filing at a time. Put the whole number on one return and it draws the excess-comp tax and the headline. Slice it across three affiliates and each piece looks modest. You're not hiding the money, you're hiding the total, and betting nobody cross-references three separate 990s. They usually don't, which is why it's one of the first things I do.
3. His public role is politics, he's COO of Turning Point Action, the (c)(4) political arm. Yet the tax-deductible (c)(3) charity pays him roughly three times what the political arm does.
WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: charity money is the cheapest money in the building. It's tax-deductible, so it's easier to raise and comes in bigger amounts. If a person's real work is political and you load that salary onto the charity, you're paying for work the charity is legally barred from doing, with subsidized dollars, and the donors wrote off politics on their taxes without knowing it. You push every cost onto the entity with the cheapest money and the least scrutiny for that line. Whether this split reflects real charitable work or a misallocation is exactly what an audit would settle, and it's the first thing I'd pull his time records for.
4. The charity paying him takes 100% of its money as grants from TPUSA, spends nearly all of it, and holds nothing. In its 2023 return it booked $3.7 million in salaries against zero employees on its federal wage form. The next year it reported 124.
WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: a satellite entity is a second set of books you fully control. Money leaves the closely-watched flagship as a "grant", which looks charitable, lands in a smaller entity nobody audits hard, and gets spent there on payroll and insiders with a fraction of the oversight. And millions in salaries booked against zero reported employees is the classic ghost-employee signature, wages to people who may not exist, or to insiders dressed as staff. Maybe 2023 was a filing error. That's the innocent read. But a swing from zero to 124 is the exact anomaly a forensic examiner reconciles first, because it's also how payroll fraud hides.
5. Within a few months of Charlie Kirk's assassination, as control of a nine-figure network changed hands, Tyler Bowyer opened five companies all within 54 days of one another. Four are anonymous Wyoming LLCs using one Cheyenne "mailbox". One is named “Vote LLC.” One is “Tyler Bowyer Inc.,” at the same address he already invoices the charity from.
WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: the entire purpose of an anonymous LLC is that no one can prove YOU got paid. Send money to “Victory Advisors LLC” and the trail dead-ends at a mail drop. Stand up a personal corporation at your billing address and your fees now flow through a company with one more wall between the cash and your name. And you build the pipes before the money moves, right when the org is in transition and everyone's looking at the funeral instead of the filings.
6. He co-owns Resolute Media, run out of a building on the charity's campus, and chairs Superfeed, the for-profit the movement pays, with Erika Kirk's own mother on the board.
WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: self-dealing is invisible when the counterparty wears a different name. You don't embezzle from the nonprofit, you sell to it, at your price, through a company you own. The charity pays “Superfeed” or “Resolute,” it reads as a normal vendor, and the profit lands with the same people who run the charity.
7. On their signed federal returns, TPUSA and Turning Point Action both answered "No" to the question regulators scan for self-dealing: any business transactions with an officer, or with a company an officer controls.
WHY BAD ACTORS DO EXACTLY THIS: that box is the one you most need blank, because a "yes" invites the audit you're avoiding. And here's the defense they'll reach for, so let me get ahead of it. They'll say the "No" is technically correct: officer pay gets reported elsewhere, and this schedule only captures a company an officer owns more than 35% of. Fine. But that's exactly the problem. Those thresholds are the exits. Officer comp is excluded. A 34% stake is excluded. So a person can be paid by the charity, own a slice of the vendors it hires, and chair a company it does business with, and still, truthfully, check "No." The schedule built to expose insider dealing has doors an insider can walk right through. A "No" here doesn't mean there's nothing to see. It means the only way to see it is the one thing they haven't handed over: the ownership percentages and the payment records. That, again, is the audit.
The pattern: Every one of these findings align to what someone committing fraud would do and reveals a behavioral pattern: to make the money harder to see, the recipient harder to name, and the total harder to add up. Real fraud isn't loud. It's a hundred small, individually-defensible decisions that all lean the same way, toward the insiders and away from the light. One of these could be considered a "quirk", but all seven, across every entity, for years, it is a design.
I can't prove intent from a tax form. Intent lives in the bank records and the operating agreements, and those aren't public. But every structural choice here is the one a person with something to hide would make. That is the reason to open the books.
Tyler Bowyer (and all of TPUSA, but I'll get there in the following parts) needs a real forensic audit, by the IRS, by the Arizona AG, by anyone with the subpoena power to pull what a 990 will never show you.
They built the structure betting nobody would read the filings or pay attention. I'm paying attention.
Part 2 coming next. Who do you want? Erika Kirk or Andrew Kolvet?
Is it possible to film a halal killing so that we can all see what it's like ?
Then we could know exactly what's involved and make our minds up about whether it should be allowed in this country
The Senate cannot confirm Todd Blanche on Wednesday, because Todd Blanche is actively covering up the Epstein files.
Thirty miles south of Santa Fe there are 10,000 acres called Zorro Ranch. Jeffrey Epstein owned it for a quarter century. Survivors say girls were flown there and abused there. There was a tip about girls buried in the hills, disturbing enough that the state searched with cadaver dogs this spring.
In all those years, no law enforcement agency ever searched that ranch. Not once. In 2019 the FBI raided Epstein's Manhattan townhouse and his island the week of his arrest. The ranch? Never. And when New Mexico's attorney general built his own case that year, with victim statements and suspects beyond Epstein and Maxwell, federal prosecutors called and told him to stand down. They promised to share their evidence for state charges later. His words, on the record: "I don't think that they were forthright, and I don't think that they were operating in good faith." Epstein died and the case of Zorro Ranch died with him.
This February, New Mexico tried again. A new attorney general, Raul Torrez, reopened the case: the only active criminal investigation into Zorro Ranch anywhere on earth. In March his investigators became the first law enforcement officers to ever search the property. To charge anyone still living, he needs one thing from Washington: the unredacted files. The names of victims, witnesses, and co-conspirators that are blacked out in the public release.
He asked on February 13. He asked again. And again. Five times, plus a formal legal letter, plus an attempted meeting in Washington. On June 30 he sent a letter addressed to Todd Blanche, by name: 130+ days of silence. The delay is "unreasonable under any rule of reason." And this sentence, which should be read aloud at Wednesday's hearing: "Every avenue of investigation that begins with a redacted name, a blacked-out face or an obscured date is an avenue that ends before it begins." Statutes of limitation are dying while the files sit in a building in Washington.
The man that letter is addressed to is Todd Blanche, the acting Attorney General of the United States.
Before he ran the Justice Department, Todd Blanche had exactly one job: personal criminal defense lawyer to Donald Trump. Trump's PAC paid his firm nearly $10,000,000. Trump appears in more than 5,300 of the released Epstein documents. The Justice Department's own ethics chief told Blanche, in writing, in his first two weeks, to recuse himself from his former client's matters. He refused. Then he took personal control of everything Epstein.
Personal control looks like this. He flew to Florida and spent nine private hours with Ghislaine Maxwell, the only living witness who knows everything. She came out announcing Trump did nothing wrong. A week later she was moved to a minimum-security camp that Bureau of Prisons policy says sex offenders can't be in. Under oath, Blanche described it as "low-security to low-security." That is false on the Bureau's own records. She has made it public that she'll "speak fully and honestly" if she gets clemency. Think about that...
Personal control looks like this. When a 2015 DEA memo surfaced in the files tying Epstein and 14 redacted names to drug and prostitution money, about $50 million in flagged wire transfers, a senator demanded the unredacted version. The DEA administrator was ready to hand it over. Senator Wyden says Blanche personally stopped him. Blanche's response was to call a sitting senator a fabricator. The memo is still sealed today. And the 43-year-old task force that wrote it, the one that caught El Chapo? Blanche shut the whole thing down.
Personal control looks like this. His department withheld FBI interviews of a woman whose abuse allegation mentioned Trump, and quietly deleted one from the public database after release. It came back only when reporters caught it. He certified to Congress, in writing, that nothing was withheld for political reasons. A federal judge has now ruled, in the government's own words, that "the Attorney General has conceded that he is in violation of the Act." Blanche's answer to the unsealing order was to refuse and ask for 60 more days. His answer to you was: "We are not sitting on a single piece of paper."
One man sits between the Epstein files and every investigation trying to open them. That man was paid ten million dollars by the most famous name in them.
And Epstein is only the first file. The deep dive covers the rest: the tax immunity he signed for Trump's family, "FOREVER BARRED," worth $600M+, that a judge is now probing as a possible fraud on the court.
The prosecution a federal judge dismissed as vindictive, finding Blanche "started the investigation to implicate" the defendant.
The bodycam of an opposition mayor arrested "per the deputy attorney general of the United States" as the cameras were ordered off.
The armed marshals at a whistleblower's door the night before her testimony.
This is a dangerous man. Not a partisan, a dangerous man: one who has proven he will point the entire machinery of American justice at protecting a single client and burying a single story, and who is days away from owning that machinery permanently.
The hearing is Wednesday, 9am. Your two senators decide. Tag them below and ask one question: "Will you confirm the man covering up the Epstein files before the Inspector General tells you whether he lied to you?"
@SenThomTillis@SenatorCollins@LisaMurkowski@JohnCornyn@SenBillCassidy@HawleyMO: you said you had concerns. This is what they look like on paper. I'll email you the full 20 page report.
Repost so no senator can say they didn't know.
SHOCKING EXPOSURE — THE ENTIRE ‘COVID PANDEMIC’ WAS A PREMEDITATED DEEP STATE PLOT ORCHESTRATED BY BILL GATES, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, DR. FAUCI AND THE ROTHSCHILD FAMILY CABAL!
WE HAVE THEIR DAMNING EMAILS AS PROOF!
THESE ARE WAR CRIMES AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY ON A GLOBAL SCALE!
THESE GLOBALIST MONSTERS MUST BE ARRESTED NOW FOR THEIR DEPOPULATION AGENDA!
Patriots, the mask is completely OFF… The storm is closing in on the entire treasonous cabal!
FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING
A new study found a SINGLE 5g psilocybin dose RESTORED speech, memory, AND bladder control in an advanced Alzheimer’s patient.
After 1 month, the patient was STILL functionally improved and bladder control remained RESTORED.
No Alzheimer’s drug has EVER done anything close.
New 2026 lawsuit shows companies, including Fortune 500 companies are using an AI software that automatically filters out job applicants based on personal data
The AI takes your location info, social media posts, even web searches and automatically rejects your job application (INSANE)
“If you've been applying to any corporate jobs lately, the reason you got rejected or never even received a response is far crazier than you ever could have thought. A lawsuit just exposed Eightfold AI, the company Microsoft and many other giants use to score your application.
And in that lawsuit, they're saying that Eightfold AI is not doing what we all thought, which was just kind of processing your application and giving you a little score.
They're actually taking all the data they can find about you; your location history, your web searches, your social profiles, files, combining all of it and giving you a score, 0 out of 5.
And if you have a low one, they're not ever gonna look at you. So yeah, now we have a social credit score for applications”
Here’s more information:
It’s a real class-action lawsuit filed in 2026 against Eightfold AI. They are a major AI-powered hiring platform used by companies like Microsoft, PayPal, Morgan Stanley, Starbucks, Chevron, Bayer and more
Secret scoring system works like this
Eightfold’s tools allegedly generate a “Match Score” or “likelihood of success” score from 0 to 5 for applicants
Low-scoring candidates are often automatically filtered out automatically before any human recruiter sees their application
The AI supposedly uses extensive data collections and aggregates far more than just your resume and over letter. This includes:
- Social media profiles (e.g., LinkedIn)
- Location and history data
- Internet activity including web searches
- Other third-party tracking data, the suit mentions vast datasets with 1.5+ billion data points
There is no transparency or recourse
Applicants allegedly aren’t notified, given a chance to review/correct the data, or informed of adverse actions
The plaintiffs argue violates the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and California’s Investigative Consumer Reporting Agencies Act
This should definitely be banned