Have you heard of the Potential Pandemic Pathogen Care and Oversight (P3CO) Review Group?
If you have, congratulations because even though the group’s existence is publicly available, the government refuses to publish its membership or allow the public to know the details of the research they sign off on.
The Potential Pandemic Pathogen Care and Oversight (P3CO) Review Group is said to be a multidisciplinary body established by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to evaluate and guide funding decisions for research involving enhanced potential pandemic pathogens (ePPPs) i.e. gain of function research.
This group is said to include experts in various fields such as scientific research, biosafety, biosecurity, medical countermeasures, law, ethics, public health preparedness and response, biodefense, select agent regulations, and public health policy. However as I mentioned, the only problem is that the group’s members are a secret.
Think about it, we don’t know who is making critical research decisions on enhanced potential pandemic pathogens (ePPPs) that the government wants to study for reasons we are also not privy to.
Dr. Chris Hassell, the HHS Deputy Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response and the chair of the HHS P3CO Review Group, has indicated that the review group includes members from the NIH, specifically from the Office of the Director, to avoid conflicts of interest with NIH institutes or centers that would be funding entities. So just “trust us” no COI’s are happening, we can’t tell anything else but “trust us”.
Well I feel much better now
The reasons given for the decision to keep the names of the P3CO Review Group members and the details of the research confidential is driven by the need to protect personal security, maintain the integrity of the review process, and safeguard sensitive information.
This means that if this group does approve research that leads to a pandemic, we will never know who made the decisions that led to it.
The P3CO Review Group's primary role is to conduct a thorough pre-funding review of proposed research that is reasonably anticipated to create, transfer, or use ePPPs.
The group makes recommendations to the funding agency on whether the proposed research is acceptable for HHS funding and, if so, whether certain experiments should be modified or specific risk mitigation measures should be employed.
The P3CO Review Group was established in response to the Recommended Policy Guidance for Departmental Development of Review Mechanisms for Potential Pandemic Pathogen Care and Oversight issued by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy in 2017.
This framework was developed after a three-year deliberative process during which the U.S. government initiated a funding pause from 2014-2017 for select research that was reasonably anticipated to enhance the pathogenicity and/or transmissibility of influenza, MERS, or SARS viruses in mammals via the respiratory route.
The fact that the members of this group is kept secret from the public should be deeply troubling to the people of the world. Especially given that they are specifically dealing with gain of function research that is funded by taxpayers for unknown reasons.
A call for complete transparency is the obvious thing to do and whatever their reasoning may be it is not justified in light of what the world just went through. All the names and research should be released and Congress should insist upon it.
It’s an outrage that they have the temerity to do this in such a brazen and tone deaf manner in a time that we haven’t even conducted a full independent investigation into the origins of COVID.
Why should we trust them? The answer is we shouldn’t.
Bill Gates praises India's "digital public infrastructure"—combining biometric digital ID (known as "Aadhaar"), bank accounts and payments—as "foundational" for keeping tabs on farmers, monitoring people's health records and helping with "climate problems".
Leaked private WEF Young Global Leaders training session video shows Klaus Schwab assuring new recruits that their "avatar" will continue to live after they die, and that their brains "will be replicated through artificial intelligence and algorithms".
"You have the chance to look forward to a career of 50 years, maybe more... Your avatar will continue to live, and your brain will be replicated through artificial intelligence and algorithms... But at least 50 years."
WCH Health & Science Lead Christof Plothe DO asked 36 questions at the recent #Geneva press conference on Human Rights and COVID-19:
1- Why were we not told that the Covid 19 virus was patented by Moderna in 2018?
2- Why did Moderna produce 100,000 Covid-19 vaccine doses in 2019 before the pandemic started?
3- Why, against all scientific evidence, were lockdowns and masks used?
4- Why were we not told that the ‘vaccine’ does not remain in the arm, but accumulates all over the body?
5- Why was PCR testing recommended when it is not designed for diagnostic purposes?
6- Why were the definitions of ‘vaccine’, and ‘herd immunity’ changed prior to the Covid-19 outbreak?
7- Why was a pandemic declared when the case fatality rate was akin to ’flu?
8- Why were tests on genotoxicity, teratogenicity, and carcinogenicity not carried out, and yet we were told the ‘vaccine’ was safe?
9- Why was there no proper follow-up of all people injected when using a new gene therapy product?
10- Why were doctors and the public not reminded regularly about the need to report adverse reactions to these new and experimental genetic ‘vaccines’?
11- Why was a ‘vaccine’ recommended during an ongoing pandemic, which is contraindicated in vaccinology?
12- Why was a ‘vaccine’ recommended for those who had superior natural immunity?
13- Why was a novel gene therapy launched after three months, instead of the required ten years?
14- Why were we not told that, in the Pfizer trial, more people died in the vaccinated group than in the control group?
15- Why were we told that Covid injections were ‘safe and effective’ when the evidence did not substantiate this?
16- Why were – and are – opposing voices from science and practicing medicine discredited, punished, and jailed?
17- Why were doctors, for the first time in history, discouraged from treating a disease, and told to wait for a vaccine?
18- Why was early treatment discouraged, whilst we know it is the most important tool to address any infectious disease?
19- Why were effective and very safe medicines like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin discredited and even prohibited?
20- Why did the producers of the novel gene therapies not want their data to be published for 75 years?
21- Why were Covid injections, masks and lockdowns recommended for children when it was known that they were not severely affected and did not spread Covid?
22- Why were the Covid injections recommended in pregnancy, when over 80% of babies were lost in trials when women were vaccinated in the first trimester?
23- Why was emergency approval guaranteed when over 2,000 people died within the first three months after vaccination roll-out?
24- Why is there no scientific outcry after over 3,500 papers have been published demonstrating side effects of the Covid-19 injections?
25- Why are conflicts of interest tolerated among medical authorities, with the FDA, EMA, and WHO being 80-90% funded by industry?
26- Why was there no adequate education of doctors, patients, and the public, and thus no possibility of informed consent?
27- Why and how were the media captured so that they pushed only one agenda worldwide?
28- Why were and are effective treatment protocols, which have existed since 2020, banned and declared illegal?
29- Why are we not told about the unnecessary deaths that were attributed to Covid but actually caused by iatrogenic measures (e.g. Midazolam, ventilation) carried out in early 2020?
30- Why was the fundamental role of Vitamin D status, diet, and the microbiome not communicated, when these measures could have prevented almost 100% of Covid deaths?
31- Why was and is a certain medical procedure forced upon people against their will, whilst the Nuremberg Declaration clearly opposes this?
32- Why is gain of function research, like that relating to Covid-19, not banned worldwide?
33- Why is an mRNA product still being used, when we know that mRNA is being incorporated into the human genome, and resulting in the production of other, unknown, proteins?
34- Why has the failed mRNA concept not been stopped, when we know it increases the likelihood of the recipient getting Covid-19, thus demonstrating negative efficacy?
35-Why do these products continue to be recommended, when at least 17 million people are believed to have died due to the injections?
36-Why is there no investigation into excess deaths, and increases in rates of cancer and heart problems, etc., which started in 2021, not in 2020?
What do we do when the so-called health authorities get it wrong and cause immeasurable harm?
@RWMaloneMD@PierreKory @WCH_Japan2023 @P_McCulloughMD@Tammy1Peterson@mrmarkdolan@BretWeinstein@Johnincarlisle@JackieS82674799
Dr. David Martin: If the WHO Pandemic Agreement passes in May, the WHO will gain the ability to "suspend all civil liberties", should it arbitrarily decide there's a "public health emergency".
"[Covid was used to] terrorise the world, convince them that we need some giant protector state that actually has some sort of supranational ability, and then suspend civil liberties as long as they need to be suspended... at the whim of funding agencies who have no criminal accountability."
"These things are set up to be terror campaigns, to modify the public's willingness to give up their liberties."
Credit: @DrDMartinWorld@FactsMatterRB
Watch the full interview: https://t.co/XGLgR7iSZK
Follow my backup account: @wide_awake_news
Subscribe to me on Telegram: https://t.co/PCfPqqHrrw
Subscribe to my newsletter, for daily email updates: https://t.co/KIgEQYjeJS
Greenpeace co-founder, Dr. Patrick Moore, blows the lid off the #ClimateScam:
"There is no definitive scientific proof that CO2 is responsible for any of the slight warming of the global climate that has occurred during the last 300 years."
"But there is certainty beyond a reasonable doubt that CO2 is the building block for all life on Earth, and that without its presence in the global atmosphere… this would be a dead planet."
Full talk: https://t.co/DyLNO6rwcv
Follow my backup account: @wide_awake_news
Subscribe to me on Telegram: https://t.co/PCfPqqHrrw
Subscribe to my newsletter, for daily email updates: https://t.co/lCHv5M6RdL
I 💚 CO2
When you understand that CO2 is beneficial to all life on planet Earth, that vegetation loves it, as well as plankton and phytoplankton, and that our greenhouse gases are 95% water vapour, and that CO2 at current concentrations or higher has negligible impact on temperature compared to water vapour. And that life adapts faster to increases of temperature & CO2 than in decreases in either. Then you will love CO2 for the rest of your life.
#ILOVECO2
🚨🇫🇷 Macron - France
The Mainstream Media LIE by Omission
In France MSM are focused on Emmanuel Macrons visit to meet the Swedish Royal Family all the while France is on Fire.
This is brilliant 👏👇
German farmers have blocked access to Frankfurt airport, Germany's largest airport.
If the farmers fall, we all fall. It's imperative that you support them!
#NoFarmersNoFood
Reformed ex-climate alarmist: "There is no climate crisis... [There is] no consistent correlation between carbon dioxide and Earth's temperature—at times CO2 was 1300% of today, and we were stuck in very cold conditions... There is no foundation to the climate scare—it's all based on models that don't work."
Source: https://t.co/lFB8SZ1BMY
For more content like this, visit: https://t.co/KIgEQYjeJS
#ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero
Dr. Meryl Nass explains how the WHO's proposed pandemic treaty will enable the WHO "to take over jurisdiction of everything in the world by saying that climate change, animals, plants, water systems [and] ecosystems are all central to health".
In addition to that, it will remove human rights protections, enforce censorship and digital passports, require governments to push a single "official" narrative, and enable the WHO to declare "pandemics" on a whim.
"We're undergoing a soft coup... under the pretext of pandemic preparedness and the biosecurity agenda."
Source: https://t.co/mEKLBxZDWg
For more content like this, visit: https://t.co/lCHv5M6RdL
#WHO #PandemicTreaty #ClimateScam
Dr. McCullough: The Powers That Be Are Telegraphing the Next Pandemic
“They [Tedros, Hotez, Fauci, Gates] are all publicly stating with great enthusiasm that there will be another pandemic — a serious one. And that COVID-19 is just a warm-up for the next pandemic,” reported Dr. @P_McCulloughMD.
“We ought to be ready for treatment and not necessarily concede to lockdown, social distancing, and wait for a vaccine. That failed miserably with COVID,” he expressed.
“And I think that’s what these vaccine enthusiasts want. They want one after another. In fact ... CEPI, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovation. The business plan says there will be a wave of pandemics, one after another. And there’s only going to be one solution for each one — a vaccine.”
On May 11 1987, The London Times, one of the world's most respected newspapers, published an explosive article entitled "Smallpox vaccine triggered AIDS virus."
The story suggested the smallpox eradication vaccine program sponsored by the WHO (World Health Organization) was
Greenpeace co-founder, Dr. Patrick Moore, on the genocidal nature of Net Zero policies:
"We're now facing a situation where a huge number of very powerful organisations and elites are calling for policies that are basically a suicide pact. Basically a death wish... They might not want to say it out loud, but there's a lot of people who think there's too many people."
Full interview: https://t.co/segJUbahof
For more content like this, visit: https://t.co/lCHv5M6RdL
#ClimateScam #ClimateCult #NetZero #NetZeroScam
If these findings are correct, it would mean that “the so-called ‘vaccines’ are altering the human genome + causing permanent production of the deadly spike protein,” & would “trigger the immune system to attack its own cells." — Dr. Steven E. Greer
https://t.co/nYknJTRh7h
NASA admits climate change occurs because of changes in Earth's solar orbit, not because of SUVs and fossil fuels -- Earth Changes -- https://t.co/hKKAaFQESz https://t.co/5kD2F6WGex
🚨🚨🚨2009 - Whistleblower, Jane Burgermeister : “After an UPCOMING and PLANNED health crisis, they want to INSTALL a, one world government with the WHO and UN in charge and it will happen in EVERY COUNTRY at the same time! They want to fulfill this dream by using a PANDEMIC and #Vaccine as instruments - There is a SECRET BIOLOGICAL WARFARE against civilians being carried out!!” 😳
I mean, what fucking much more can she say that won’t make you guys think!? Do you understand the WHO’s proposed pandemic treaty now? And why they’re pushing so hard to pass it through?
They went after her career, she has nothing to gain from this, and she just told you then, exactly what’s happening today, 15 years ago👇 Time to listen to these people, please 🙏