BFJV

“do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory.. love only that which they defend.” Liberty

[JoeLange @JoeLange]

I would encourage everyone to relax on the two big “losses” at the Supreme Court.

Step back.

There’s something bigger happening.

Though I missed most of the news happening yesterday.

Trump’s reaction to his loss on “mail in ballots” was eye opening to me, because Trump didn’t seem too phased by the ruling.

He used some wording in his response, which downplayed the ruling and I think that was the KEY.

https://t.co/zc7K3lXLs4

Did you catch the part everyone missed?

“basically, they’re keeping it a little way that it is now”

Reminder.

Trump isn’t trying to get rid of ALL mail in ballots.
Just the fraudulent ones.

The largest group of “mail in ballots” come from the military.

Anybody remember the Bush vs Gore election?

“Gov. George W. Bush sued election officials in 13 Florida counties today for rejecting the absentee ballots of members of the military serving abroad, capitalizing on an issue that has been a public relations boon to the Republicans and that could determine the fate of hundreds of votes for the presidency.”

https://t.co/A5rkX1ANnx

Now if anybody’s vote should be protected, it should definitely be the people who are risking their lives to protect our freedoms.
Trump is going to protect the “mail in ballots” of our military personnel.

But why did Trump say, the Supreme Court ruling was basically keeping it “a little” the way it is now?

The Supreme Court didn’t prevent ballots received AFTER election day from being counted, but did require the ballots to be “postmarked” by election day.

Why is that a big deal?

GAME THEORY.

Trump AND the Supreme Court are in the process of removing the avenues for cheating through mail in ballots in the FUTURE, while at the same time, preventing the future lawsuits that try and prevent military ballots that were mailed by election day.

Don’t forget:

The U.S. Postal Service is refusing all “mail in ballots” that are not verified by the federal registry proving citizenship.
And the Postal Service owns a patent on blockchain technology associated with “mail in ballots.”

None of this is a coincidence.

What looked like a loss, actually helped cement in the Constitution, that ALL mail in ballots must be “postmarked” by election day.
Blockchain technology will be used to “prove” that postmark in the FUTURE.

Never forget that Trump is playing the “long game” and trying to establish as many legal “safeguards” as possible.

Same with the birthright citizenship “loss.”

It looks really bad, but most people are missing the same “playbook” by Kavanaugh, when Trump took his first loss at the Supreme Court over tariffs.

Trump purposely used a specific law on tariffs that was rejected by the Supreme Court.
He knew it would be rejected.
Trump was purposely “limiting” the broad use of that specific law by past presidents, so that presidents in the FUTURE, can’t use it to get rid of his tariffs.

What did Trump do?

The same day, he took Kavanaugh’s “advice” and reinstated the tariffs using the law that is now deemed Constitutional.

Kavanaugh just did the same thing with “birthright citizenship.”

He outlined the legal pathway that the Supreme Court will approve, for “ending” birthright citizenship.

From Senator Eric Schmitt:
——————
“The majority tried to constitutionalize unlimited birthright citizenship. But Justice Kavanaugh MAY have left Congress a door.”

“I’m filing legislation to walk through it.”

“And I’ll keep working on a constitutional amendment to restore American citizenship.”
———————
Rand Paul has also declared that he is for the amendment.

Have you noticed Rand has flipped and now supporting Trump?

Trump is playing the long game and this “loss,” will be turned into a “win” but more importantly, immigration law will be permanently changed to prevent birthright citizenship in the FUTURE.

What’s happened at the Supreme Court over the last two days, is not the end of the story.

The “end results” are what really matters and that’s the game that Trump is playing.

[The General @1776General_]

Justice Roberts who voted against Trumps EO on birthright citizenship.

Roberts human trafficked children into the USA and was a visitor of the Island.

[RedWave Press @RedWavePress]

MOMENTS AGO: President Trump on Truth Social: “I would like to congratulate President Xi, and the Great Country of China, on their massive Birthright Citizenship WIN! President DONALD J. TRUMP”

He’s right!

[Bo Loudon @BoLoudon]

The author of the 14th Amendment:

"This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens..."

The SCOTUS didn't just go against President Trump, they went against the Constitution.

[Brivael Le Pogam @brivael]

SpaceX a clôturé son premier jour de cotation à 2 100 milliards de dollars, +19%. Tout le monde regarde le chiffre. Personne ne regarde ce qu'il price réellement.

Laissez-moi vous dire ce que le marché vient d'acheter, et pourquoi je pense que cette boîte vaudra 30 à 50 trillions d'ici 5 ans.

D'abord, le symbole. Cette IPO est un référendum. D'un côté, 20 ans de discours sur la décroissance, la sobriété, la redistribution, la fin de l'histoire gérée par des comités. De l'autre, un homme qui a dit "je vais rendre l'humanité multiplanétaire", que tout le monde a traité de clown, et qui vient de créer la plus grosse entreprise cotée de l'histoire en partant d'un entrepôt à El Segundo. Le marché a voté. Le wokisme avait des départements RH, SpaceX avait des fusées. Les fusées ont gagné.

Ensuite, la mécanique économique, parce que c'est là que tout le monde se trompe. Les analystes valorisent SpaceX comme une entreprise de lancement plus Starlink. C'est comme valoriser Internet en 1995 sur le marché du fax. Starship ne réduit pas le coût du kilo en orbite de 20%, il le divise par 100. Et chaque fois dans l'histoire qu'un coût d'infrastructure est divisé par 100, ce n'est pas le marché existant qui grossit, ce sont des industries entières qui naissent. Le coût du calcul divisé par 100 a donné Internet, le smartphone, l'IA. Le coût de l'orbite divisé par 100 va donner une économie spatiale complète.

Faisons la liste de ce qui devient rentable quand le kilo en orbite coûte le prix d'un billet d'avion. Les data centers orbitaux, avec énergie solaire continue et refroidissement gratuit, au moment exact où l'IA fait exploser la demande énergétique terrestre. La fabrication en microgravité de semi-conducteurs, de fibres optiques, d'organes imprimés impossibles à produire sous gravité. Le tourisme orbital de masse, puis les hôtels lunaires, qui passeront du fantasme au business plan exactement comme la croisière de luxe au 20ème siècle. Le transport point à point terrestre, Paris-Tokyo en 40 minutes. L'industrie minière des astéroïdes, dont un seul corps de classe M contient plus de métaux que tout ce que l'humanité a extrait depuis le néolithique. Et Mars en ligne de mire, pas comme destination touristique, mais comme le plus grand projet d'infrastructure jamais entrepris, avec tout ce que ça implique de demande en énergie, matériaux, robotique, IA.

SpaceX ne participera pas à ces marchés. SpaceX possède le péage d'entrée de tous ces marchés. C'est AWS, mais pour la civilisation. Apple vaut 3 500 milliards en vendant des rectangles de verre sur une seule planète. Le premier monopole d'accès à une frontière infinie à 30 ou 50 trillions dans 5 ans, ce n'est pas de l'exubérance, c'est une simple règle de trois sur l'expansion du marché adressable.

Et maintenant, la partie que je préfère. Ce futur n'a pas besoin de bureaucrates. Il n'y a pas de comité consultatif en orbite. Pas de commission Théodule sur Mars. Chaque dollar de cette nouvelle économie sera créé par des ingénieurs, des techniciens, des soudeurs, des pilotes, des entrepreneurs. Les diplômés en gestion de la norme vont devoir apprendre un métier utile, et franchement, c'est une excellente nouvelle pour eux aussi : construire est infiniment plus fun que contrôler.

Parce que c'est ça, le vrai signal d'aujourd'hui. Pendant 50 ans on nous a vendu un futur rétréci : moins d'énergie, moins d'enfants, moins d'ambition, gérer le déclin proprement. Et là, d'un coup, le plus gros actif financier du monde est un pari sur l'abondance, l'expansion et l'aventure. Le pessimisme vient de passer en position vendeuse sur lui-même.

Le futur sera méga fun. Il y aura des hôtels avec vue sur la Terre, des honeymoons en orbite, des gamins qui diront "papa, c'était comment avant les fusées réutilisables" comme on dit "c'était comment avant Internet". Et quelque part dans les années 2030, un humain marchera sur Mars en livestream devant 5 milliards de personnes, et ce jour-là plus personne ne se souviendra du nom d'un seul de ses détracteurs.

Achetez de l'optimisme. C'est encore sous-valorisé.

[BFJV @WarForYourHeart]

@Symphony_res That cop is a tyrant. This is not tolerated in the United States of America. It’s a violation of the constitution. “Looking” is not a crime. 🙄 The Brits commenting that he should have just given his ID over are clearly cucked. Do you not realize you are occupied by foreigners?

[John F. Kennedy Jr Q @Real_JFK_Jr_]

🚨 BREAKING

🇺🇸 FED WILL INJECT $3,288,000,000.00 INTO THE ECONOMY RIGHT BEFORE THE U.S. MARKET OPENS!

NEW FED CHAIR, KEVIN WARSH, HAS URGENTLY ORDERED THE FED TO BEGIN QE (MONEY PRINTING) TO PREVENT A BRUTAL MARKET CRASH ON MONDAY.

SOMETHING VERY BAD IS HAPPENING RIGHT NOW…

[Sabrina F. @itsmeback_]

🔻OGNI LOTTO DI VACCINO AVEVA UNA FORMULA DIVERSA. I NUMERI DI LOTTO LO PROVAVANO.
Non una teoria.
Non un'interpretazione.
Un set di dati. 12.000 numeri di lotto. Incrociati con i rapporti di eventi avversi del VAERS. La correlazione è assoluta.
Un team di ricercatori - 4 statistici, 2 farmacologi, 1 ex regolatore della FDA - ha pubblicato i loro risultati su un server decentralizzato mercoledì. Il documento è di 147 pagine. La revisione paritaria era impossibile perché nessuna rivista l'avrebbe accettata. Così l'hanno rilasciato direttamente al pubblico.
La scoperta: specifici numeri di lotto hanno prodotto eventi avversi 4.000% in più rispetto ad altri.
Non variazione casuale.
Non incoerenza di produzione.
Un modello deliberato e sistematico.
Numeri di lotto che terminano con 20A fino a 20F: eventi avversi quasi nulli. Soluzione salina. Placebo. Acqua con un'etichetta.
Numeri di lotto che terminano con 21K fino a 21X: eventi avversi moderati. Stanchezza. Miocardite. Coaguli di sangue. Tassi di ospedalizzazione del 300% sopra la linea di base.
Numeri di lotto che terminano con 22R fino a 22Z: catastrofici. Ictus. Arresto cardiaco. Danni neurologici. Tassi di mortalità dell'8.100% sopra la norma statistica per qualsiasi prodotto farmaceutico nella storia.
Tre livelli. Tre formule. Distribuiti in un modello che assicurava che nessun singolo ospedale, nessuna singola città, nessuna singola demografia ricevesse abbastanza dosi catastrofiche da innescare un segnale statistico evidente.
Hanno definito i danni come "effetti collaterali rari". Ma non erano rari. Erano mirati.
Il modello di distribuzione non era casuale. I lotti catastrofici sono stati inviati in modo sproporzionato a specifici codici postali. Codici postali con alte concentrazioni di veterani militari. Primi soccorritori. Proprietari di imprese indipendenti. Comunità con una conformità storicamente bassa ai mandati federali.
Le persone più propense a resistere hanno ricevuto le dosi più pericolose.
I lotti moderati sono andati ai centri urbani con un elevato consumo di media - popolazioni che avrebbero segnalato sintomi lievi, avrebbero sentito che era "normale" e sarebbero tornate per i richiami senza esitazioni.
I lotti placebo sono andati a politici, personaggi dei media e dirigenti farmaceutici. Le persone che lo promuovevano in televisione. Le persone che ti dicevano che era "sicuro ed efficace" mentre ricevevano la soluzione salina.
Hanno preso lo stesso vaccino in televisione. Non hanno preso la stessa formula.
I 12.000 numeri di lotto sono ora mappati. Ogni lotto.
Ogni destinazione. Ogni risultato. I dati sono sulla blockchain. Non possono essere ritirati. Non possono essere cancellati dalla memoria. Non possono essere verificati fino all'oblio.
L'ex regolatore della FDA del team ha presentato il set di dati al tribunale militare con una singola dichiarazione: "Questa non è stata negligenza. Questo era un protocollo di dispiegamento di armi mascherato da sanità pubblica."
Il tribunale ha accettato come prova giovedì mattina. Numero di caso: GT-2026-0441.
Ogni numero di lotto è un'impronta digitale.
Ogni evento avverso è un testimone. Ogni certificato di morte è un'accusa.
CODICE: LOT-NUMBERS / 3-TIERS / ZIP-TARGETED / GT-2026-0441
Non hanno dato a tutti la stessa dose. Hanno dato a tutti la dose assegnata.
Ora la lista delle assegnazioni è una prova.

- M-B Technology

[𝕊𝕂𝕐 @SKYRIDER4538]

@WhiteHouse @Jules31415 This is more accurate.

[The White House @WhiteHouse]

TWO KINGS. 👑

[Spitfire @RealSpitfire]

Trump just changed how the world operates.

The Gulf of America in all its glory🔥🔥🔥🔥

[ΛЯIΣᄂ @Prolotario1]

Ladies & Gentlemen: I Present To You

The Trump Card 🃏

• The bogeyman Iran threatens to close the straight. (No Ships)

• The US calls their bluff, and closes it for them. (Big Balls)

• All oil tankers go to Texas buy US oil instead. (Checkmate)

[🇺🇸 Justice @250_Revolution]

Concerning Social Security payments, my contributions were made for 40 years on every salary I received. Those jobs may not have always been the work I wanted to be doing at the time, BUT I always had a job. The Social Security check is now (or soon will be) referred to as a "Federal Benefit Payment?" I'll be part of the one percent to forward this.

I am forwarding it because it touches a nerve in me, and I hope it will in you. Please keep passing it on until everyone in our country has read it. The government is now referring to our Social Security checks as a "Federal Benefit Payment." This isn't a benefit. It is our money paid out of our earned income! Not only did we all contribute to Social Security but our employers did too. It totaled 15% of our income before taxes.

If you averaged $30K per year over your working life, that's close to $180,000 invested in Social Security. If you calculate the future value of your monthly investment in social security ($375/month, including both you and your employers contributions) at a meager 1% interest rate compounded monthly, after 40 years of working you'd have more than $1.3+ million dollars saved! This is your personal investment. Upon retirement, if you took out only 3% per year, you'd receive $39,318 per year, or $3,277 per month.

That's almost three times more than today's average Social Security benefit of $1,230 per month, according to the Social Security Administration. (Google it – it’s a fact).

And your retirement fund would last more than 33 years (until you're 98 if you retire at age 65)! I can only imagine how much better most average-income people could live in retirement if our government had just invested our money in low-risk interest-earning accounts.

Instead, the folks in Washington pulled off a bigger "Ponzi scheme" than Bernie Madoff ever did. They took our money and used it elsewhere. They forgot (oh yes, they knew) that it was OUR money they were taking. They didn't have a referendum to ask us if we wanted to lend the money to them. And they didn't pay interest on the debt they assumed. And recently they've told us that the money won't support us for very much longer.
But is it our fault they misused our investments? And now, to add insult to injury, they're calling it a "benefit", as if we never worked to earn every penny of it.
Just because they borrowed the money doesn't mean that our investments were a charity!

Let's take a stand. We have earned our right to Social Security and Medicare. Demand that our legislators bring some sense into our government.
Find a way to keep Social Security and Medicare going for the sake of that 92% of our population who need it. Then call it what it is: Our Earned Retirement Income.

😡😡😡✅

[QUANTUM GUARD ™️ @QuantumGuard17]

🚨 WATCH: WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange tells Megyn Kelly that the reason his organization has never released any damaging materials on President Trump is that “There is no dirt to release on Donald Trump.” He is probably the most squeaky clean individual in Washington because he is not a career politician or a product of the globalist cabal of elites. Julian Assange is a hero for EXPOSING to the world THE TRUTH about Hillary Clinton and saving us from her planned destruction of America and the world order as we know it. Trump is the greatest existential threat to the globalist uni-party cabal… They have absolutely nothing on him and he has everything on them. In other words, he has “all the cards” to checkmate the Deep State. God Bless Julian Assange, a years-long former political prisoner, and Thank God he is finally free at last.

[Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh]

🚨 BREAKING: President Trump announces that with the "DEATH" of Iran, "the greatest enemy America has is the Radical Left, Highly Incompetent, Democrat Party"

He's right. The enemy within is actively trying to destroy the republic.

We CAN'T and WON'T let them! 🇺🇸

[BFJV @WarForYourHeart]

@heynavtoor @elonmusk is this something we can stop? Or is this something that is inherent to all AI models because it is created by imperfect human beings? We don’t want to create “The Entity” when AGI goes mainstream.

[Collin Rugg @CollinRugg]

JUST IN: Man accused of killing his daughter's rap*st wins the Republican primary for county sheriff in central Arkansas.

Aaron Spencer, who is awaiting his murder trial, received over 53% of the vote in Lonoke County.

Last year, Spencer announced on social media that he was running for sheriff because the legal system had "failed."

In 2024, Spencer allegedly woke up to find his 14-year-old daughter missing from her bed.

Spencer searched the neighborhood and found his daughter in a car with 67-year-old Michael Fosler, according to court documents.

He then chased the car down and drove it off the road before shooting and killing Fosler.

Fosler was facing over 40 child s*x crime charges involving Spencer's daughter when he was shot.

Spencer's wife says their daughter was "targeted, groomed and ultimately r*ped by the boyfriend of a family friend."

"I’m the father who acted to protect his daughter when the system failed," Spencer said at the time of his announcement.

[Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ @shanaka86]

JUST IN: Meta sold 7 million Ray-Ban smart glasses in 2025 alone.

Workers in Kenya are watching the footage.

Not metadata. Not anonymized clips. The actual videos. People undressing. People in bathrooms. People having sex. Bank cards. Medical documents.

The blurring is supposed to protect privacy. It fails constantly. The contractors see everything.

Here is the part that should stop you cold: You did not buy the glasses. You did not agree to the terms of service. You did not consent to anything. But if someone wearing Meta glasses walks into your bedroom, your bathroom, your doctor's office, your home, a contractor on the other side of the world may be watching you right now.

The person wearing the glasses consented. Everyone else in the room did not.

Meta's defense is that this is all disclosed in the privacy policy. They are technically correct. Buried in language so dense that 99% of users never read it. And even if they did, it would not matter, because the terms govern the wearer's data. Not yours. You are not a party to the contract. You are the product being annotated.

Millions of AI-enabled cameras walking around in public. Recording constantly. Uploading to servers. Reviewed by humans earning a few dollars an hour to label your most intimate moments so the algorithm gets smarter.

This is not a bug. This is the business model.

The EU is already asking questions. MEPs submitted formal inquiries to the Commission this week demanding answers on GDPR compliance. The problem is obvious: European data protection law requires consent from data subjects. Bystanders are data subjects. Bystanders never consented. The entire architecture violates the regulation by design.

Meta's response has been silence and a reference to terms of service that do not apply to the people actually being filmed.

Google Glass died because people called the wearers "Glassholes" and banned them from bars. Meta solved the social problem by making the glasses look normal. They did not solve the privacy problem. They hid it.

Seven million units sold in 2025. The installed base is accelerating. Every unit is a potential surveillance node operated by someone who may not understand what they are feeding into the system and reviewed by contractors who see everything the algorithm cannot process.

The question is not whether this becomes a scandal. The question is whether the scandal arrives before or after the glasses are on 50 million faces.

Watch the EU. If Brussels moves on GDPR enforcement, Meta faces a choice: disable human review in Europe and cripple the AI training pipeline, or accept fines that could reach billions. Neither outcome is priced into the stock.

The glasses are selling faster than ever.

The contractors keep watching.

And somewhere right now, someone you have never met is looking at footage of you that you never knew existed.

[@amuse @amuse]

TEXAS SENATE RACE: If Trump endorses Cornyn it will cost him and the GOP dearly. Cornyn claimed Trump led an insurrection and praised Biden’s approach to border security. Don’t do it Mr. President.