Wikipedia is Political Propaganda

Wikipedia Admin, I am making sure evils of Wikipedia are exposed. Formerly @WSJ @NYTimes @Meta.

[Wikipedia is Political Propaganda @WikiElites]

Wow, this site is such a mess. Cullen328 is an aggressively elitist person. Here's a list of more of these terribly discriminatory Wikipedians:

Fram is somehow a propagandist and a deletionist, and so are his bullying cohorts Mccapra, Netherzone, Ovinus, Ritchie333, etc.

[Wikipedia is Political Propaganda @WikiElites]

Wikipedians like Beeblebrox, Wolfdog, Beyond My Ken, Floquenbeam, Binksternet, & Grayfell have been at the center of a terrifying the amount of bullying.

Some, like Binksternet, have been banned multiple times, but they just allow them back on.

Wikipedia protects bullies.

[Ron Merkle (d/acc) #FREESCHLEP 🇺🇦🇹🇼 @Liltjay08Foo]

GenderDesk blog is now reporting on my ban from Wikipediocracy.
https://t.co/O0e2VkwRW5
@BenjaminIkuta @Kumioko2 @shlomitlir @WikiElites @wikiland @WikipediaFlood

[Ron Merkle (d/acc) #FREESCHLEP 🇺🇦🇹🇼 @Liltjay08Foo]

@shlomitlir After some deep-diving I can confidently establish that the doxxer is actually a globally-banned user after all. I sent my findings to Wikimedia stewards inbox but they keep playing bureaucratic FIFA World Cup.
@BenjaminIkuta @Kumioko2 @NickMoyes @SplunkATO @WikiElites @Wikiland

[Larry Sanger @lsanger]

Jimbo can say that a "core value" of Wikipedia is neutrality, but its definition of "neutrality" has changed. Neutrality is made to depend on what they call "reliable sources"...which are mostly Establishment Left sources. So....yeah. It's not *genuinely* neutral.

[Larry Sanger @lsanger]

This is entirely true: Wikipedia is explicitly committed to progressivism. For my comments on Wikipedia's 2017 "movement strategy" and explicit commitments to progressivism, go to https://t.co/L7M9j6QqMq and search on the page for "movement strategy".

[Larry Sanger @lsanger]

Want Wikipedia to be a proper wiki again? Weigh in about the Nine Theses.

See especially 1, 4, and 8.

Dust off your old account and let your voice be heard!
> https://t.co/D3mDJ1yekB <

[Larry Sanger @lsanger]

Wikipedia is no longer a wiki. It certainly was one when we started it. Somewhere along the line, it stopped being a site anybody could edit.

[T. D. Adler @tdadler]

NEW, by me:
Report: Wikipedia Owners Miss House Committee Document Request Deadline

https://t.co/0fV90Zof6T

[Karata @karatademada]

Grokipedia should be here in a week or so. MACROHARD is almost here too.

Elon and xAI keep pushing AI to new levels. Buckle up people, the future’s about to get real. 🔥

Who’s excited ?

[DogeDesigner @cb_doge]

Grokipedia will be the first AI-driven encyclopedia without bias.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Version 0.1 early beta of Grokipedia will be published in 2 weeks

[Defiant L’s @DefiantLs]

Here is another reason why we desperately need Grokipedia,

Wikipedia tells people "Kill The Boer" is a South African anti-apartheid song, but if you say "White Lives Matter" that is a neo-Nazi slogan.

[T. D. Adler @tdadler]

NEW, by me:
Wikipedia Editors Pushed ‘Far-right’ Smear Against Charlie Kirk Following Assassination

https://t.co/4mcWyvIaOF

[Defiant L’s @DefiantLs]

We might be getting the first Grokipedia beta in a week 👀

[Justapedia Foundation @JustapediaF]

Never miss a Feature Showcase on Justapedia! Each one is archived. If you can write pragmatically with engaging prose, value balance & objectivity, & love to inform, consider becoming a Justapedist & share your knowledge. 🌐✍️
https://t.co/9Oa1uMZKgj

[Justapedia Foundation @JustapediaF]

A bit of history.

[Ashley Rindsberg @AshleyRindsberg]

Am I hallucinating?

I recently did a piece showing how @Wikipedia editors relied heavily on articles from the @Guardian to brand Trump an "authoritarian."

Researching the piece, I noticed that a couple of the most important Guardian articles in this effort carried a very prominent note that these articles were "supported by" George Soros' Open Society Foundations.

When I reviewed the articles after my article came out, that note was no longer there. Instead there is a much more vague note saying the articles were supported by "The https://t.co/uK21fO01xq."

Had I completely made this up? Was my brain going full ChatGPT?

Turns out no. The articles that had previously carried a "Supported by Open Society Foundations" tag now have "Supported by https://t.co/uK21fO01xq" in their place.

)Image on the left was accessed via https://t.co/15VVI1A7hx showing a June version. Image on the right was accessed today directly from The Guardian's website.)

Why did The Guardian make this change?

[Defiant L’s @DefiantLs]

Grokipedia is coming.

[X Freeze @XFreeze]

Grokipedia is going to be the world's biggest, most accurate knowledge source, for humans and AI with no limits on use

Currently, Grok is using massive amounts of inference compute to look at, sources like Wikipedia page and asking: What’s true, partially true, false, or missing?

Then it rewrites those pages, removing falsehoods, correcting half-truths, and adding crucial & missing context

the reason why it will be the true knowledge source is because it's built solely for the truth and to navigate to the truth... free from bias or hidden agendas

Elon never does anything by half measures, he dives straight to the full extent...

Something that'll strike like a sharp spear just like the community Notes on 𝕏, which even called out the WHO for shoving false info down our throats with the tag carrying "We are always right"

with Grok, Grokipedia aims for maximum truth through first principles and physics. It replaces partially masked evidences of how legacy media operates, rewriting with complete accurate context that cuts through the BS

this will combat the evil organizations and the evil minds that operating under the hood and who've poisoned minds for decades with endless fake news and distorted narratives through legacy media and Wikipedia, causing immense harm to young minds and manipulated the world long enough

This will change for good...... Grokipedia will change it

[T. D. Adler @tdadler]

The page for the "Nine Theses" by Wikipedia co-founder @lsanger has been locked for a week so only administrators can edit it after numerous editors fought to remove material criticizing site editors, eventually getting it kept out of the page. My piece has been updated.

[Jan Kragt @jgkragt]

A revival of Christianity is not the same as a Christian revival.

What even is tradition Christianity?
If today's trad Christianity is a direct nemesis to anti-Christian Woke culture, it's a mirror of a mirror of a mirror.

But we can pretend otherwise.