@LawyerYouKnow I’m not sure if anything beyond Mr Clancy’s testimony has, to date, been necessary. Let’s get to the argument - was she criminally responsible for murdering the children?
A view of the scene isn’t helping determine facts surrounding that question. Bring on the MH specialists!
@TaraSweeney5@defense_diaries Great question. Sadly I can’t see there being a great answer. I like this judge but am beyond disappointed he has taken this information and created the circus sideshow it is without his own scrutiny (presumably). Talk about playing it up for the media! The irony is palpable.
@defense_diaries This judge is very clued up. If info had been leaked publicly that he’d impounded, we’d be talking about it. Instead the judge has told everyone to file anything they know about the info being wrongfully shared. Bet it’s only Proctors team that knows anything about it. Clever.
@piersmorgan Betrayal wouldn’t be needed if he just looked at his own actions objectively. Anyone normal would accept that they’re not right for the job and step aside. Problem then is who would be the replacement. Terrible times.
@MartinSLewis In a current world full of demons, what a shining light this man is.
Martin Lewis should, at the very least, be prime minister. We might get a decent country back!
Thank you for all you do Martin. Absolute legend.
@Daniel03040206@KarlTurnerMP I wondered why you were disgruntled. Then I checked your profile. Let me help you out. The comments made that you are upset about are humorous. Sarcasm. A Yorkshire man, with a sense of humour being just that.
You’re welcome ☺️
@andykopsa She had to keep up the ‘he’s guilty’ narrative to make her husband look less of a twat for declaring RA was guilty as charged even before trial. Apparently looking at fish from a bridge and false confessions due to abhorrent treatment makes someone guilty of a horrific murder 🤨
@FlemingPam67990@defense_diaries@larart10000 You mean they didn’t keep an open mind until ALL the very limited evidence was presented 😱
What treacherous journalism and psychology!!!
It’s almost like they took an alternative view for clicks. Certainly didn’t follow common sense! Or evidence.
@larart10000@defense_diaries I remember this. It was outrageous. Guilty even before trial. His ‘evidence’ was Ricks own words ‘admitting he killed the girls to unburden himself’. and there was something about Rick looking into a pond from the bridge. They lost all credibility at this point. Grifters.