@smithsrsn@jbransonx@afg1911a1 First off thanks captain, sadly there seems to be thousands of aviation experts overnight so your information is valuable. I also found this video of the same co-pilot, what do you name of it?
@DarthRaider916@ChampRDS@styxlegit45 This is just retarded, considering he even went to try double champ unlike many others. He has the record of lw defenses so that is wrong. Recency bias. Also he is ducking but sadly people remember a 2nd loss more than ducking...
@WHussar19821@VigiaCiudadano7 Wow there's actually a genius we found with the right perspective. Everyone else is just being emotional. She could lose her job if she oversteps as copilot, and he was overconfident.
So I would just ask out of curiosity. As they are in that storm the very moment before they ask the elevate, what would have been the best course of action to come out of the stlrm instead of elevating?
I already know they could have been more aware of the icing or the storm which maybe they didn't see.
Thank you, just want a professionals information.
@vanilafawn You are so beautiful I would assume you would never do it with a dude and stay a virgn your whole life. No man is worthy of being near you. I would have prostrated and started kissing the ground you were standing on...
He deserves more blame so the burden of performance can become stronger and we lose less lives. With that much experience you can't make the calls he did. I am so upset Nathalie died that I am depressed about it. She was only 20, we can't expect for her to call the shots, the pilot could complain and get her fired.
It is not recommended, especially by most airliners, so that is what I was explaining by prohibited. Turbulence penetration is a speed, you are stating the obvious. On the original post I explained how they could have gone straight towards Freeport instead of any adjustments, that is a direction. I have real peers in piloting school that know more than yourself. The NTSB is still investigating but that doesn't mean people in the field can't explain what occured. As a pilot in training, I am using analogies that resonate with the people not in this field. There, everything dismissed. You are just another clown with a superiority complex, check out the Dunning-Krugger affect. I'll be manning the skies, whilst you can stick to your crypto, armchair aviation, and Charlatan arguing with professionals on subjects you do not have any knowledge on.
In piloting to try to climb storms is prohibited and a risky instinct such as swerving around another car which is illegal. It's all about prevention and going around but they were already in it so hell. They could have taken even a detour to address the ice or make sure everything was good. Also they kept fighting the turbulence by such as by ascending instead of using the Learjets turbulence penetration speed for storms. It's like panicking when your drowning instead of floating on your back. They most likely didn't see that last storm cell or at least the severity of it which is an entirely different issue. Peers of mine say that the Learjet is poor. A lot of these older jets use weather detection systems from the 1990s. Also storm cells can grow thousands of feet in just a few minutes. The Learjet has poor de-icing, and no automated computer stall control (which doesn't matter anyways because ice would give autopilot the wrong directions.) I think pilots will now be a lot more careful with, "light icing" and 700 ft turbulence which is actually severe.
@smithsrsn@jbransonx@afg1911a1 So why wouldn't they do this: Maintain course, slow down, and not ascend?
Or did they not know the storm they were in was that bad? I think that would mean poor judgement by Nathalie. Thank you also for your information through this whole post.