Respectable debate does not use insults, name-calling or what-aboutism. No. It stays on topic.
Persuasive debate touches on all relative pro/con info when prudent, gives merit where due and is receptive to opposing view all whilst favoring desired position with proper emphasis.
@Gen_Z_4_Trump “Biden must be sweating bullets” is some of the finest projection I’ve witnessed recently
1st let’s review the impeachment scorecard shall we?
Trump: 2
Biden: 0
Then there is the seemingly endless instances of the former guy’s legal vulnerabilities...
https://t.co/MTZ5OJHdN0
@Stonekettle Why doesn’t the GOP simply identify who their whistleblower is? They demanded the identity Lt. Col. Vindman from impeachment 1.0 who, w/ his brother was retaliated against & fired for only doing his duty. For adhering to the oath he took. https://t.co/md0SfXZjmQ
@PiperK Being up against the “my way or the highway” AND readily capitulating isn’t going to get him a pass especially after all that twitter files tabbi malarkey. Maybe Matt can write up a new version about undue influence upon this shit show Elmo has made it
@Stonekettle I feel so sorry for that poor fella.
Ok, that has passed. Now send in the clowns...
“Isn't it rich?
Isn't it queer?
Losing my timing this late in my career
But where are the clowns?
There ought to be clowns
Well, maybe next year”
https://t.co/XyZspFAPj3
@highbrow_nobrow What is that ole saying about things sounding too good to be true?
And the one about a fool & their money are soon parted. C’est la vie!
@HawleyMO Gee whiz josh, the previous president you, yes you couldn’t write up an acquittal bill fast enough to insulate the previous guy from being impeached. Now you want accountability?
Resign.
“I read the news today, oh boy
About a lucky man who made the grade
And though the news was rather sad
Well, I just had to laugh
I saw the photograph”
https://t.co/7pLCHg5AVh
@amuse It was a “protective order” not a gag order and the defendant was given every opportunity to speak...
In court.
Under oath.
https://t.co/gZdZerDXON
This viral tweet is false.
A protective order isn’t a gag order, which implicates far higher First Amendment concerns.
The judge explicitly said he’s “not close” to issuing a gag order at Trump’s arraignment, only a protective order. https://t.co/F7KAMmukjI