7/ In light of the evidence, it’s difficult to see how @LGBTLabour have concluded that our report was “straightforward disinformation”. I await their detailed reasoning for this allegation of dishonesty, which I hope to be imminent. END
Is this an official Labour account? To describe the scrupulous, line by line analysis of the Conversion Practices Draft Bill by @akuareindorf & Baroness Falkner as “straightforward disinformation” is outrageous cobblers.
And if that’s your best argument, the Bill is in trouble
Is this an official Labour account? To describe the scrupulous, line by line analysis of the Conversion Practices Draft Bill by @akuareindorf & Baroness Falkner as “straightforward disinformation” is outrageous cobblers.
And if that’s your best argument, the Bill is in trouble
@musta_ankka Drop it, admit that the manifesto promise was stupid, face down the trans lobby, loudly despatch to the Greens whatever remains of the lobby within Labour, win back left-wing feminist votes and win the next election.
That would be my suggestion.
@musta_ankka Drop it, admit that the manifesto promise was stupid, face down the trans lobby, loudly despatch to the Greens whatever remains of the lobby within Labour, win back left-wing feminist votes and win the next election.
That would be my suggestion.
The quickest & most effective way of improving the bill would be to drop it.
You have a Horlicks on your hands & it cannot & should not be saved.
We already have sufficient legislation in place to deal with all forms of abuse.
No need to ladle this stodgy gravy on top.
Walk away.
Again: if you’ve ever wondered why three Scottish women ended up at the @UKSupremeCourt in 2025 getting a a definitive clarification of the Equality Act 2010, it’s because of Stonewall’s outrageous behaviour. The idea that anyone lets them near legislation drafting is astonishing
We have now formally written to the Chair and Members of the Conversion Practices Select Committee, asking them to include us in discussions on the Bill and its potential impact on detransitioners and organisations like ours.
Detransitioners must not be overlooked or excluded from decisions that directly affect our lives. Our voices, experiences and perspectives deserve to be heard and represented.
We urge the Committee to recognise the importance of including detransitioner voices and engaging with organisations that support our community.
We will update everyone once we receive a response. In the meantime, please continue to share our message and help raise awareness. The more visible our voices are, the harder they are to ignore.
@NazShahBfd@oliviabaileymp@DannyBeales@mariecgoldman @sirjermeywright
The PLS committee on the conversion bill must hear from detransitioners.
You cannot say the bill "symmetrically" protects people and then ignore detransitioners caused by many to believe they have an identity.
That is apparently directly within the scope of the bill.
@LabourList In Stonewall's evidence they stated that 30% of trans people and 10% of gay people have been subjected to exorcism. This figure is complete nonsense, if true it would mean that there have been more exorcisms carried out in the UK than marriages.
Our position is unequivocal.
LGBT+ Conservatives DOES NOT SUPPORT the Conversion Practice’s Bill.
Our red lines have not been met. This Bill goes too far. Withdraw it in full.
@LGBTCons 👏
So clear
Thank you for standing up against an over reaching, dangerous bill which would also harm TQ people by making them unemployable, risk of jail for parents, grandparents
Danger to LGB children of being led to trans door 4 questioning
@HJoyceGender@akuareindorf
Brave of the first gay org that still retains the ‘T’ (just) to recognise that this Bill is only pretending to be about gay people but is actually a TQ+ takeover bid.
This is funny because I used to go to the Ladies' pond around 25 yrs ago and if anyone male was spotted by the terrifying woman in charge she would shout at him through a megaphone. And that included toddlers.