I don't care for your agenda and I have no dog in this fight. But I want to address this thing you people always do.
What you're comparing is beauty, not pussy. There is no impression of the pussy quality by the facial or physical appearance. You just imply it and expect it because you're attracted to the person. That is because you're vieeing from the blind side. When a woman looks good, has mad shape, has money or is a successful career person, you inflate the pussy quality by expectation. But post nut clarity will always mark the script.
The taste of the pudding is in the eating. Just as we know that a good sized penis or male sexual performance is not by how good he looks or how much money he has, same applies to women. You can have 2 MSC, a big curvy ass and be a Senior manager at Tech company, and a tailor or perfume vendor have better pussy quality than you.
In summary, attraction may determine who you take to bed. But you cannot tell who has a better pussy by physical appearance. I'll conclude by giving you practical example.
Glory Hole:
Glory hole is a partition made in public toilet or adult establishment for anonymous sex, whereby the men on this side cannot see the women on the other side. There is a hole created for sexual intercourse while preserving the identity of the fvckers from each other. With this measure, without being blinded by attraction, you can fairly judge what a good pussy is and what it isn't. If the partition is removed, the women with a good pussy may not look like what you project in your head.
Thank you for coming to my Ted Talk.
Firstly, Ethiopia is under US sanctions while Vietnam is not. And speaking of former French colonies, Haiti was the first to get independence (1804) and is still one of the poorest countries in the world because of the debt they had to take on to gain independence (it took them until 1947 to fully repay it!). Whereas, New Caledonia is still a French colony and is neither rich nor poor.
"If colonialism were the answer to why Africa is poor..."
This line completely ignores the European powers' (and US) post-colonial control over Africa. Patrice Lumumba, the first democratically elected leader of the DRC, was tortured and killed by Belgium and the US for being a nationalist. His body was dissolved in acid so he wouldn't become a martyr. His legacy is largely unknown even within the continent. Several other such "lessons" were meted out. Google Thomas Sankara (Burkina Faso) and Sylvanus Olympio (Togo).
Once you set the example, you gain obedience. The VietCong, on the other hand, didn't surrender even though 3 million Vietnamese died during the war, and several thousand more continue to die to this day (!) from Agent Orange exposure.
As for former French colonies in Africa, France still controls their currency and holds their central bank reserves in France. As Rothschild purportedly said, "permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws."
Third, the borders in Africa were drawn in such a way that conflict was inevitable. At the Berlin Conference in 1884-85, the European powers simply carved up the continent by drawing straight line borders. African leaders were conspicuous only by their absence at this historic event which shaped the next century. This is why Cameroon, a French-speaking country, has a minority English-speaking territory, ensuring it remains destabilized. Likewise for West Asia/the Middle East, where the Sykes-Picot legacy lives on.
@magattew conflates formal colonial rule with colonial control. Vietnam managed to fully kick out both France and the US, reunified the North and the South, and kept its sovereignty. All African leaders who attempted the same have been systematically eliminated (see Muammar Gaddafi, Libya's divisive leader, for a recent example), ensuring Africa forever bears the open wounds of its colonial legacy.
But Ms. Wade is right on one thing: Vietnam owes its prosperity to overcoming colonial rule. Maybe Africa can become prosperous if Africans do the same.
We recently moved a 3-bedroom + full size basement worth of items, and hereโs how we did it without a moving company:
- First, we sold off heavy items like couches, bed frames, dining tables, chairs, and a TV. You can replace them when you get to your location. These items cost money to move and are not worth the expenses. If you buy them from a furniture store, they will deliver it for free.
- We donated and disposed of things we havenโt used in the last 6 months to 1 year and might never use. Thereโs no need to take old junk to a new house. ๐
- Clothes, shoes, washing and drying machines, a lawn mower, a snowblower, and miscellaneous items were loaded in a ProMaster 3500 cargo van we already own for business. Itโs a long, huge van. We loaded it 3 times.
We also needed to move 5 cars, but there were only two of us. My best friend drove one, and we drove the other two to the location, then returned home with an Uber. On our final move day, we drove the remaining two cars ourselves.
To offload the items, I posted a listing on the Facebook group of our new location to get helpers. We paid $40/hour. Two people showed up and helped up to carry those heavy items up the stairs.
Lastly, make use of your Facebook groups. There are people willing to assist you for less if you can give them some money. You can plead with someone who owns a big truck to help you move heavy items for a coffee + gas fee, and they would. I remember when we bought a bathroom vanity at Loweโs and couldnโt pick it up because it weighed over 400 pounds. I posted it on Facebook, and a guy came with a pickup truck to bring the vanity back to my house for $60. The total travel distance was less than 15 miles.