@UT4x_champs@RedRaiderMafia Again. Thats the fucking point. Why is the NCAA letting Ut players eligible after betting. Per their own rules is a suspension.
That proves the double standard right there. If Tech wasnt the new kid on the block and in the SEC/Big10 this would have been swept under the rug.
@Orangebloodsatx The judge who gave the verdict (Judge Kenneth Curry) from Forth worth who graduated from UT arlington and University of Houston law school. At one point is that a conflict of interest. Ill wait. Maybe read up before you make false points.
@UT4x_champs I did read the article. That’s the whole point. If they bet, they shouldn’t be allowed to play according to the NCAA rules, yet there were. There was no community uproar about it either.
@Orangebloodsatx Brother yes they are. I can tag you in about a million post saying permanent banning for betting is the rule and should be upheld. Again Im not arguing Sorsby should play. If the allegations are true that he placed even one bet against his team, he should be done.
@Orangebloodsatx Thats literally what every person is arguing. They want Sorsby banned from the NCAA. And if the allegations he bet against his team I agree.