Konstantin

iOS

[Sydney Runkle @sydneyrunkle]

https://t.co/CF54CU9Ddz

[codila @0xCodila]

Jev is the "Internet" moment for the AI industry

It tells your agents and LLMs what to do next, in milliseconds and at almost zero cost

If you set it up correctly, you will have the AI engineer’s stack for 2028

In this article, I show you how https://t.co/x3qn41ejnr

[Kyle Macomber @kylemacomber]

The gold standard fluid interactions on iOS are built using in-process client animations (like SwiftUI does it) and not render-server animations (like CoreAnimation does it). This is common knowledge inside of Apple’s UI framework and system experience teams.

A close inspection of iOS’s evolution reveals the gradual upgrading of system experiences written using render-server animations (that often disable user interaction) with ones using client animations (that are interruptible and interactive). The app switcher for iPhone X, the Dynamic Island, and Liquid Glass bars are prime examples of this trend.

The other thing that makes these experiences feel so fluid is their use of spring animations that preserve velocity, rather than Bézier curve easing functions. To get velocity preservation, you need to be able to interrupt a spring animation and retarget it or drive it with a gesture. That’s a lot easier to do when the animation is running in the same process as the event handling.

When we were first pitching SwiftUI, two of our go-to demos were a recreation of the iOS 9 navigation and Home Screen interactions which were fully interactive and interruptible, at a time when the actual implementations of those experiences in the OS disabled user interaction and ran server-side animations.

CoreAnimation is great and the framework does much more than animation. You can build a fine app using its server-side animations. But if your UI framework can’t do efficient main thread client animations, there’s a ceiling to the quality of the experience your app can provide.

[Samat Galimov @samat]

Сделал бесплатную программку для автоматической записи и расшифровки онлайн-встреч.

Работает с любыми звонками: zoom, google meet, телеграм, вацап...

Запускает и останавливает запись автоматически.

Расшифровывает встречи, определяет говорящих, так что реплики разложены по людям, а не слиты в один поток.

Пишет качественные выжимки встреч. Многие программы экономят на токенах, а эта использует самую мощную модель, чтобы ничего не потерять.

Умеет делать всё это локально, без доступа к интернету.

Можно подключить мощные платные модели, умеет использовать подписки (!) и API ключи.

Все данные хранятся локально на компьютере. Одна встреча — одна папка, внутри аудиофайл, расшифровка, выжимка. Очень удобно натравить нейросети.

Программа полностью бесплатная, с открытым исходным кодом. Легкая установка, нотаризованный Apple бинарник.

Работает на macOS; если вы заинтересованы в Windows-версии — чирканите мне письмо на [email protected].

❧

Даже со всеми нейросетями, разработка заняла почти месяц (неделя активной работы, дальше по мелочи) — вы не представляете, сколько краевых случаев вылезло, пока я тестировал приложение на себе.

[Kyle Macomber @kylemacomber]

Fun fact: the creator of CoreAnimation is one of the creators of SwiftUI!

The decision to run animations in the app process rather than the render server (as CoreAnimation does) was one of the earliest and most fundamental decisions we made when designing SwiftUI.

Some of the most distinctive experiences of using an iPhone, like UIScrollView rubber banding and SpringBoard app switching are only possible as client-side animations.

But these experiences aren’t easy to build with UIKit!

This is because if you want a UI to be fully interactive and interruptible by the user while it’s animating, it has to be running in the same process as the event handling.

In fact, in iOS 18 we added new APIs to AppKit and UIKit to adopt the SwiftUI client-side animation model.

There are a lot of valid critiques of SwiftUI. The fact that SwiftUI doesn’t use CoreAnimation for its animations is not one of them.

[Pagina lixo @paginalixo1]

o iphone que a minha geração queria ver

[Sarun W. @sarunw]

Xcode 27 includes agent skills for modern best practices and new APIs.

You can export these skills and use them outside Xcode with a single command:

xcrun agent skills export --output-dir ~/Downloads/xcode-skills

[Стартапы и бизнес @vcru]

«Академия» Anthropic, уроки по созданию приложений от Google и советы от разработчиков Codex — сделали подборку бесплатных материалов для продвинутой работы с нейросетями и ИИ-агентами.

От гайдов по для новичков до лекций для создания агентов https://t.co/FJIqHLBqSg

[beginbot 🃏 @beginbot]

sub agents being released into my codebase

[John Ternus @johnternus]

hello

[Brilliant Maps @BrilliantMaps]

North American Cities Transposed Onto Europe At The Same Latitude

Surprised?

See the reverse here: https://t.co/EGKj8wfhyb

[Tim Cook @tim_cook]

Sending lots of love to the Apple community on my last day as CEO. My title changes tomorrow, but the love I have for the Apple community never will. Thank you for being a constant source of inspiration. My gratitude is endless, and I’m excited for the next chapter!

[Mert Cobanov @mertcobanov]

bu sabah android televizyonumun geliştirici özelliklerini açıp claude’a adb ile bağlan televizyonu debloat et dedim. (donan kasan gereksiz ram tüketen her şeyin temizliği)

televizyonu kontrol etmeye başladı, uygulamaları deaktive etti, flauncher kurdu. animasyon sürelerini kısalttı. root yetkisi olmadan yapıyor bu arada.

ben bu televizyonu 4 yıl önce ilk aldığımda bile bu kadar akıcı çalışmıyordu, inanılmaz oldu. muhakkak bi bakın

[Ram Singh Verma @RamSingh_369]

Anthropic just released a 4-hour course to getting a $500k AI engineering job:

00:15 - The right way to prompt Claude
33:21 - What makes Claude act dumber on your code
01:33:39 - How Anthropic uses Claude every day
02:50:56 - The fix that makes Claude way smarter. This

4-hour Anthropic free course replaces about 10 paid engineering courses.

Watch it today, then read the step-by-step guide on building loops below.

[Peter Girnus 🦅 @gothburz]

Last quarter I rolled out Microsoft Copilot to 4,000 employees.

$30 per seat per month.

$1.4 million annually.

I called it "digital transformation."

The board loved that phrase.

They approved it in eleven minutes.

No one asked what it would actually do.

Including me.

I told everyone it would "10x productivity."

That's not a real number.

But it sounds like one.

HR asked how we'd measure the 10x.

I said we'd "leverage analytics dashboards."

They stopped asking.

Three months later I checked the usage reports.

47 people had opened it.

12 had used it more than once.

One of them was me.

I used it to summarize an email I could have read in 30 seconds.

It took 45 seconds.

Plus the time it took to fix the hallucinations.

But I called it a "pilot success."

Success means the pilot didn't visibly fail.

The CFO asked about ROI.

I showed him a graph.

The graph went up and to the right.

It measured "AI enablement."

I made that metric up.

He nodded approvingly.

We're "AI-enabled" now.

I don't know what that means.

But it's in our investor deck.

A senior developer asked why we didn't use Claude or ChatGPT.

I said we needed "enterprise-grade security."

He asked what that meant.

I said "compliance."

He asked which compliance.

I said "all of them."

He looked skeptical.

I scheduled him for a "career development conversation."

He stopped asking questions.

Microsoft sent a case study team.

They wanted to feature us as a success story.

I told them we "saved 40,000 hours."

I calculated that number by multiplying employees by a number I made up.

They didn't verify it.

They never do.

Now we're on Microsoft's website.

"Global enterprise achieves 40,000 hours of productivity gains with Copilot."

The CEO shared it on LinkedIn.

He got 3,000 likes.

He's never used Copilot.

None of the executives have.

We have an exemption.

"Strategic focus requires minimal digital distraction."

I wrote that policy.

The licenses renew next month.

I'm requesting an expansion.

5,000 more seats.

We haven't used the first 4,000.

But this time we'll "drive adoption."

Adoption means mandatory training.

Training means a 45-minute webinar no one watches.

But completion will be tracked.

Completion is a metric.

Metrics go in dashboards.

Dashboards go in board presentations.

Board presentations get me promoted.

I'll be SVP by Q3.

I still don't know what Copilot does.

But I know what it's for.

It's for showing we're "investing in AI."

Investment means spending.

Spending means commitment.

Commitment means we're serious about the future.

The future is whatever I say it is.

As long as the graph goes up and to the right.

[Konstantin @X3M_al]

@DrSaloni__ Эй, она жена Уве, она не должна так делать

[Jacob Bartlett @jacobtechtavern]

Advanced Swift Concurrency: Mutex

It’s really easy to write a naïve cache which breaks during simultaneous multithreaded access.

The new Mutex primitive in the iOS 18 Synchronization framework enables blocking thread-safe access to the protected section via locks.

Learn it here:
https://t.co/KftXLfw7Ra

[Konstantin @X3M_al]

@FootyHumour Бочка чувствуется?

[Kirill (hexlet.io) @mokevnin]

Я понял что меня больше всего бесит в ИИ. Оно мне скидывает код со словами "вот рабочая версия", ты его вставляешь как есть, запускаешь и оно не работает. Скидываешь ошибки и эта падла пишет "твой код не работает потому что". Так это твой код нахер, а не мой :)