Dr. Marci Bowers, former WPATH president, called its Standards of Care “consensus and science-based guidelines” on national TV. But the group now claims their SOC-8 was merely an “opinion” and should be treated as protected “free speech.”
This video shows the contradiction in their own words — and what that has meant for the vulnerable young people and families who trusted these "standards."
First of all, voicing political views and striving for a better Australia shouldn't result in threats or actual violence. Second, regardless of views of the target of threats/actual violence, the person engaged in the threats/actual violence is in the wrong. These are fundamental to our values and I am genuinely concerned that our current government doesn't make that crystal clear, and that they would rather sacrifice a core pillar of functioning peaceful societies for cheap points. Concerned, but not surprised.
@PaulineHansonOz@EJjohnsontweets Wow. Has Rowland looked into the standards of the Labor Party and what they are doing? Its horrifying stuff
It’s time Labor was voted out
They are a criminal enterprise
@AusHumanRights@fedcourtau when will you start to open your eyes to the truth of WHY some MEN are wanting to push their way into women’s spaces..? @salltweets
"If the system lets a man already on a correction order for sexual touching stay here long enough to rack up 32 more alleged rapes, that is the big story here. If this is what “bridging” means in Albanese’s Australia, the bridge is on fire."
RD
Attorney-General Michelle Rowland must retract her comments and apologise for slandering One Nation and its supporters while appearing to excuse the violent threats directed against them.
Millions of Australians support One Nation. They are not extremists. They are not dangerous. And ministers should not use language that encourages others to treat them as if they are.
No minister, especially the Attorney-General and first law officer of the country, should suggest there is any justification for threats against Australians because of the political party they support.
Labor should be asking why Australians are abandoning them for One Nation, not demonising those Australians for how they vote and putting them in danger.
These are desperate acts from a government of liars.
Non-Whites are Free to create comedy insulting & making fun of White people but White people are shamed, lose their jobs & are attacked for doing the EXACT SAME THING.
“Do as we say but not as we do” they preach.
We aren’t doing the selective outrage, hypocrisy or double standards thing anymore.
Targeting & creating a different set of rules for one group of people based on their skin colour is by these peoples standards- RACIST.
They are everything that they accuse us of being & worse.
@LisaJaneSpencer
The first law officer of the country just branded millions of Australians “Neo Nazis” and “dangerous”
Attorney General Michelle Rowland was asked if One Nation is dangerous.
She said “One Nation does not represent mainstream Australia.”
Then she tied the party to “extremist views including neo Nazi views” and called that “dangerous”
That is not a policy argument. That is a smear of everyone who votes for them.
One Nation is leading Newspoll.
They just took a safe Labor seat. Millions of Australians support them. They are not extremists. They are not a threat. They are voters Labor lost and now wants to demonise.
Pauline Hanson has death threats.
Protection has been increased. A man has already been charged with threatening to hunt her down. Graffiti in Bendigo read “Kill Pauline Hanson.”
And the Attorney General’s contribution is to feed the line that this party is dangerous.
No minister, least of all the first law officer, should talk about a legal political party in language that treats its supporters as a menace.
If Labor wants to know why Australians are walking away, look in the mirror.
Retract it. Apologise.
Then explain why you think millions of your fellow citizens are a danger for how they vote.
Absolutely wild timeline…
A Royal from Norway jokes with Epstein about humans no longer being able to have children
Epstein emails Bill Gates to plan ‘Pandemic Simulations’
A Pandemic ‘happens’ and Fauci demands that the World take Bill Gates’ vaccine
Fauci ignores the internal data of women having mass miscarriages after taking the ‘Covid Vaccine’ and deletes his emails
During this session with Australia Post, I raised concerns from local outlet operators like Kylie in Agnes Waters, who face increasing operational pressures.
Australia Post confirmed that while they are not actively cutting over-the-counter services, telecommunications companies, government agencies, and banks are driving down physical transactions by raising manual fees, pushing digital channels, or pulling services like Western Union.
Addressing the abrupt closure of the Coleambally Post Office, Australia Post explained it resulted from a licensee walking away without notice. To maintain local parcel, mail, and expanding financial services, they partnered with the town's pharmacy, a co-location model now operating across 82 locations nationwide.
I confirmed that ANZ officially joined Bank@Post on October 1st, bringing the total number of participating financial institutions to 81.
There is a need for physical over-the-counter banking in the bush. One Nation we will establish a People's Bank to provide a full range of banking services to everyday Australians using the Bank@Post system. This will make Post Offices profitable again and improve banking options for all Australians.
Watch the whole session here: https://t.co/JJAmqOW6No
Has he completely lost it ??
Apparently
Albanese "owes it to history" to defeat #OneNation
✍🏽 Leane McKenzie
After watching Anthony Albanese’s speech to Queensland Labor today, I’m starting to wonder whether he owes history an apology for the way he is prepared to rewrite it.
This was supposed to be a speech about Labor. Instead, a remarkable amount of it was about One Nation — because after One Nation’s stunning win in Secret Harbour, Labor is clearly getting very nervous. A seat Labor had held since 1989 is now One Nation.
And what does Albanese do?
He reaches for the oldest trick in politics: paint your opponent as evil, dishonest and dangerous, then hope nobody bothers checking the details.
“We simply must defeat them. We owe it to history.”
That is some extraordinary language from a Prime Minister talking about a democratically elected political party.
But then it gets worse.
Albanese says One Nation will “say anything and do anything to win votes”, “bend any facts”, “peddle misinformation and disinformation” and “turn Australian against Australian”.
Really?
Anything? Everything? Any fact?
Those aren’t carefully evidenced accusations. They are sweeping political smears.
And then we get the selective truth.
Yes, Pauline Hanson has made controversial comments about workers and workplace relations. She has used the word “lazy” when discussing workers she believed were difficult for businesses to dismiss.
But Albanese turns that into:
“They think Australians are lazy.”
That’s not what was said.
He takes a comment about some workers and turns it into an accusation against Australians generally.
#Then there’s the domestic violence claim.
Hanson made controversial comments describing domestic violence as a “two-way street”. You can absolutely criticise those comments. I certainly would.
#But Albanese turns that into:
“One Nation thinks domestic violence is sometimes a woman’s fault.”
Again, that’s a political interpretation presented as though it were an established fact.
#And then there’s the penalty-rate claim.
One Nation has a genuine history here that can be criticised. Pauline Hanson supported the 2017 Fair Work Commission decision to reduce some Sunday penalty rates.
Fine. That’s fair game.
#But Albanese presents the issue as though #OneNation simply has a current agenda to attack penalty rates — while conveniently ignoring the party’s subsequent parliamentary positions and the fact that the current federal law protects penalty and overtime rates.
That’s not a lie in the simple sense of inventing something from nothing.
It’s arguably worse politically.
It’s taking a piece of truth, stripping away the context and presenting it in the most damaging way possible.
#And then Albanese tells Australians that One Nation has “no serious answers” to Australia’s problems.
Well, that’s not a fact.
You might hate #OneNation’s policies.
-You might think its immigration policy is unrealistic. You might think its economic policies are terrible.
#But One Nation actually has policies.
You don’t get to declare your opponents’ policies “not serious” simply because you disagree with them.
That’s called politics, not fact.
#And let’s be honest about why Albanese is giving this speech now.
#OneNation has just taken a Labor stronghold.
Not a seat Labor held for five minutes.
#A seat Labor had held since 1989.
One Nation’s Luke Herdegen won Secret Harbour with 57 per cent after preferences, with most of the vote counted.
Suddenly the Prime Minister is telling Labor delegates that One Nation is a threat that must be defeated.
Well, perhaps Labor should ask itself why voters are moving.
Maybe people are sick of being lectured.
Maybe they’re sick of being told that anyone who disagrees with Labor is dangerous, racist, extreme, ignorant or dishonest.
Maybe they’re sick of politicians who promise one thing, deliver another and then blame everyone else when people aren’t happy.
While most of the world is starting to see it for the child abuse that it is, Norway is sadly further embracing it - and imprisoning parents who object. There is something deeply evil at work.