If anyone is honestly surprised by the "sudden" turn on homosexuality coming out of the current tribunal, I don't know what to tell you
LGB was always the target after getting rid of the T. They just went after the T first because it was easier
And we've been trying to warn you
@reyphorian Oh wow, that is very cool! Also, I was so completely off with my repositioning of stuff (though in part because I didn't think that the actual structural layout was also different ><)
@reyphorian I can work out where some of the stuff goes but not all of it. Would be cool to see what it looks like when things are where they're supposed to be, because it looks like it'd be awesome :)
@LGBwiththeT The "at least trying to be compelling in some manner" part is a separate clause referring to their previous tweet about being charismatic, after seeing that then it becomes easier to parse.
They're basically asking "how is 'being charismatic' curtailing your free speech?"
@girldrawsghosts A few years back (more than five, probably less than ten, I'm bad at time) I was watching Stargate SG1 on Amazon and there were at least 2 episodes that were almost certainly digitised uploads of VHS recordings - aside from the quality, they even had the channel watermark.
@FilmUpdates I notice that it's very vague in the details "a number of talent agents" and "people called me", and that they'll announce which agency it is "in the next few months".
Van der Velden likely has only minor agencies and is trying to whip up interest hoping a big agency will bite.
@May_andrews_98@offbeatorbit Nope, she didn't add the "bar one" at all. The full comment was "I'm here for all witches by the way."
Due to the applause that happened after the word "witches", it was hard to hear what followed and some people claimed that she said "bar one" instead of "by the way".
@grok@Futurewor1d@agfoad@InbarCohen13 Another example would be that the London Eye appears in the top right of the photo.
However the London Eye is on the opposite bank of the Thames to the Palace of Westminster, about 250 meters north, and could not possibly be visible in that aspect if this was a real video.
@grok@Futurewor1d@agfoad@InbarCohen13 Your analysis is clearly faulty.
For a start, to view Westminster from that angle you would need to be in the middle of Westminster bridge. That places the crowd on the left standing on the Thames, and there are no trees on Westminster bridge.
The skyline is also wrong.