ANNOUCEMENTтЭЧя╕П
ЁЭРАЁЭРзЁЭР▓ ЁЭРЕЁЭРИЁЭРС ЁЭРЦЁЭРвЁЭРнЁЭРбЁЭРЭЁЭРлЁЭРЪЁЭР░ЁЭРЪЁЭРе ЁЭРЫЁЭР▓ ЁЭРГЁЭРЮЁЭРеЁЭРбЁЭРв ЁЭРПЁЭРиЁЭРеЁЭРвЁЭРЬЁЭРЮ ЁЭРиЁЭРЯ ЁЭРВЁЭРЙЁЭРП ЁЭРПЁЭРлЁЭРиЁЭРнЁЭРЮЁЭРмЁЭРн ЁЭР░ЁЭРвЁЭРеЁЭРе ЁЭРЫЁЭРЮ ЁЭРЬЁЭРбЁЭРЪЁЭРеЁЭРеЁЭРЮЁЭРзЁЭРаЁЭРЮЁЭРЭ ЁЭРеЁЭРЮЁЭРаЁЭРЪЁЭРеЁЭРеЁЭР▓ ЁЭРЫЁЭР▓ ЁЭРЙЁЭРЪЁЭРвЁЭРйЁЭРоЁЭРл ЁЭРГЁЭРвЁЭРЪЁЭРеЁЭРиЁЭРаЁЭРоЁЭРЮЁЭРм
In light of the recent public statements and administrative commitments concerning the blanket withdrawal or quashing of First Information Reports (FIRs) related to the agitations led by the CJP and associated acts of public disorder, our Clients wish to assert their legal rights and standing. They vigorously oppose any such executive concessions or applications filed pursuant to Section 360 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 (formerly known as Section 321 of the CrPC).
It is well-established in law that the withdrawal of criminal prosecution cannot be permitted as a mere political compromise or executive leniency in cases involving cognizable offenses such as public violence, obstruction of public servants in the line of duty, and disturbance of public peace. Consequently, our Clients will be submitting appropriate Intervention Applications and Impleadment Petitions to the competent jurisdictional Courts. They aim to demonstrate that any unilateral withdrawal of prosecution threatens the rule of law, and the dismissal of such criminal proceedings without judicial review would be entirely illegitimate, legally unsound, and against the public interest.
ЁЭРЦЁЭРЮ ЁЭР░ЁЭРвЁЭРеЁЭРе ЁЭРЬЁЭРбЁЭРЪЁЭРеЁЭРеЁЭРЮЁЭРзЁЭРаЁЭРЮ ЁЭРЪЁЭРзЁЭР▓ ЁЭРГЁЭРЮЁЭРеЁЭРбЁЭРв ЁЭРПЁЭРиЁЭРеЁЭРвЁЭРЬЁЭРЮ ЁЭРЪЁЭРйЁЭРйЁЭРеЁЭРвЁЭРЬЁЭРЪЁЭРнЁЭРвЁЭРиЁЭРз ЁЭРЪЁЭРмЁЭРдЁЭРвЁЭРзЁЭРа ЁЭРЯЁЭРиЁЭРл ЁЭРЦЁЭРвЁЭРнЁЭРбЁЭРЭЁЭРлЁЭРЪЁЭР░ЁЭРЪЁЭРе ЁЭРиЁЭРЯ ЁЭРнЁЭРбЁЭРЮЁЭРмЁЭРЮ ЁЭРЕЁЭРИЁЭРСЁЭРм ЁЭРвЁЭРз ЁЭРнЁЭРбЁЭРЮ ЁЭРСЁЭРЮЁЭРеЁЭРЮЁЭРпЁЭРЪЁЭРзЁЭРн ЁЭРВЁЭРиЁЭРоЁЭРлЁЭРнЁЭРм @SachdevaAmita