A 'Yes' vote was supported by:
- All three government parties
- Almost all opposition parties
- The €6bn-a-year NGO sector
And with the exception of a couple of rogue Independents, poorly-resourced street activists and Aontú's Peadar Toibín, there was basically no 'No' campaign to speak of. That's basically zilch compared to the behemoth that is the State - the 'No' posters only went up at the 11th hour after 'Yes' had been campaigning for ages.
And it still appears to have been utterly destroyed in a crushing defeat for the referendum's proponents.
If this is not a wake-up call that there is a disconnect between the political establishment and the public, I don't know what is.
#Referendum2024 #Ref24
Please Share Far And Wide:
It is absolutely crucial that everyone grasps the terrifying reality of what's unfolding in Ireland. Our freedom, the freedom of the press, the freedom to express our views, the freedom to protest, and the freedom of speech are all under relentless assault. Our nation is undergoing a profound transformation, and the government, seemingly ignoring the very people who put them in power, is speeding towards an election where, regardless of the main political parties chosen in your vote, they all dance to the same tune or essentially exhibit the same level of disdain for the electorate.
Social media and organisations such as @griptmedia , along with select broadcasters like myself, are viewed as threats by the government. Not because we propagate falsehoods or disinformation, but because we dare to correct and balance the narrative and misrepresentations of the truth peddled by some of our elected representatives. Their only response is to wield a heavy-handed arsenal of discrediting, canceling, silencing, and shutting down these alternative voices. Numerous instances abound, with Senator Malcolm Byrne recently singling out Gript Media baselessly, suggestion they should not be accredited by the press council and quoting guidelines suggesting they discriminate against minorities with no evidence of these accusations.
Leo Varadkar himself, in a bid to control the narrative, suggested to @griptmedia reporter @Ben_Scallan that they fact-check themselves regarding mainstream media myths surrounding immigration policy. Despite the policy surrounding seeking asylum being in the first country of entry, Varadkar's claims, including checking criminal records and the idea that Ireland maintains open borders, were debunked by Gript, Aontu, and other informed individuals, even within his own Government past and present. Goinf as far as contradicting his own opinions of the past.
A chilling future looms on the horizon where laws may soon be enacted to stifle alternate views, deeming them offensive or inciting hatred. The question arises, who gets to decide what views are offensive or incitement? Answer: The government of course, through appointed moral guardians committees and organisations, who will hold this power, deciding whether citizens are allowed to express their opinions or if the media can broadcast particular dissenting views or alternate viewpoints.
Orwellian legislation, poised on the precipice of being signed by our president, threatens not only those who spread alternate viewpoints but even those who dare to think about them or prepare related content. Justice Minister Helen McEntee provides a stark example by suggesting recently that you could be prosecuted for having a banner with alleged hateful slogans in your car trunk going to a protest if your car is searched by the Gardai. Home searches, device seizures, and prosecutions may follow, even if the material was never posted online or in public.
Elected representatives, aware that this legislation contradicts democratic principles and infringes upon free speech, lack the courage to vote against it, fearing repercussions that might jeopardize their political standing and overpaid positions. As I observe my surroundings daily, it becomes painfully apparent that citizens, preoccupied with day-to-day life, are oblivious to the gravity of these regressive laws and controls imposed by both the government and the EU. These laws will directly impact their ability to think critically, as they remain shielded from any dissenting information beyond the government-sanctioned narrative that they will be exposed to on main stream media or by mainstream press.
To those currently fighting in Ireland, like myself, @Gript, and a few others, and to those with international platforms like @elonmusk , @RobertKennedyJr , @shellenberger , and many more, we applaud your efforts. Keep highlighting the implementation of these Orwellian laws on the international stage and continue to expose Ireland's embarrassment. Most importantly, spread the word to those unaware of the dire situation, urging them to join the debate and resist laws and policies that threaten to strip away our freedoms to speak and express our views freely, turning Ireland into a country that even a communist society could only dream of.
How can our political leaders be enabling and facilitating this unspeakable horror on an entire captive population? What has become of our humanity? Never Again means Never Again for every single human being
#PermanentCeasefireNow#BDSNow
Deliveroo dirver Caio Benicio was on his motorbike this afternoon when he saw a man with a knife attacking a young girl in Parnell Square.
The 43-year-old Brazilian dismounted his bike, took off his helmet, and hit the attacker with it.
Read more here:
https://t.co/L7CRfb61pJ
Brazilian deliveroo driver stopped attacker today at #ParnellSquare by hitting him in the face with his helmet. His name is Caio.
He said “ I didn’t think twice, got off my bike and hit him”. 🇧🇷
@rtenews I have his number.